Literature DB >> 33452907

Correlation between tangential distortion of the outer retinal layer and metamorphopsia in patients with epiretinal membrane.

Daiki Sakai1,2,3, Seiji Takagi4, Yasuhiko Hirami5,6, Makoto Nakamura7, Yasuo Kurimoto5,6.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To evaluate tangential morphological changes in the outer retina and assess their correlation with the degree of metamorphopsia in patients with idiopathic epiretinal membrane (ERM).
METHODS: This retrospective study included patients with idiopathic ERM who underwent vitrectomy between January 2018 and December 2019. We evaluated the preoperative examination results. Using cross-sectional spectral-domain optical coherence tomography (OCT) images along the horizontal/vertical meridian through the fovea, we defined a new parameter, tangential displacement (TD), as the tangential component of the position vector of the distorted outer nuclear layer caused by ERM. Visual function measurements included M-CHARTS results (vertical/horizontal metamorphopsia score [MV/MH]) and best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA). The correlations among the OCT parameters including TD and central foveal thickness (CFT) with visual function measurements were determined.
RESULTS: Overall, 78 eyes of 76 patients (49 females; mean age, 67.9 [± standard deviation, 7.5 years]) were included. The mean horizontal TD was 24.0 ± 73.9 μm, which was significantly different from 0 (p = 0.005). The mean vertical TD was 6.0 ± 76.2 μm, which was not significantly different from 0. The absolute value of horizontal TD was significantly correlated with MV (r = 0.513, p < 0.01) and MH (r = 0.423, p < 0.01). The absolute value of vertical TD was also significantly correlated with MV (r = 0.274, p = 0.02) and MH (r = 0.413, p < 0.01). However, neither value was significantly correlated with BCVA. Multiple regression analysis showed that the horizontal absolute TD was an independent factor associated with both MV (β = 0.635, p < 0.001) and MH (β = 0.259, p = 0.048).
CONCLUSION: We found that ERM tended to distort the outer retinal layer toward the temporal side of the fovea. The tangential distortion of this layer was associated with the degree of metamorphopsia, suggesting that misalignment of parafoveal photoreceptors causes metamorphopsia in patients with ERM.
© 2021. The Author(s).

Entities:  

Keywords:  Epiretinal membrane; Metamorphopsia; Optical coherence tomography; Outer nuclear layer; Outer retinal layer

Year:  2021        PMID: 33452907     DOI: 10.1007/s00417-021-05077-4

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol        ISSN: 0721-832X            Impact factor:   3.117


  19 in total

Review 1.  Idiopathic epiretinal membrane.

Authors:  Shao-Chong Bu; Roel Kuijer; Xiao-Rong Li; Johanna M M Hooymans; Leonoor I Los
Journal:  Retina       Date:  2014-12       Impact factor: 4.256

2.  Assessment of macular function for idiopathic epiretinal membranes classified by spectral-domain optical coherence tomography.

Authors:  Jong-Uk Hwang; Joonhong Sohn; Byung Gil Moon; Soo Geun Joe; Joo Yong Lee; June-Gone Kim; Young Hee Yoon
Journal:  Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci       Date:  2012-06-14       Impact factor: 4.799

3.  Two-year results of metamorphopsia, visual acuity, and optical coherence tomographic parameters after epiretinal membrane surgery.

Authors:  Takamasa Kinoshita; Hiroko Imaizumi; Hirotomo Miyamoto; Takashi Katome; Kentaro Semba; Yoshinori Mitamura
Journal:  Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol       Date:  2015-08-30       Impact factor: 3.117

4.  INNER NUCLEAR LAYER THICKNESS AS A PROGNOSTIC FACTOR FOR METAMORPHOPSIA AFTER EPIRETINAL MEMBRANE SURGERY.

Authors:  Fumiki Okamoto; Yoshimi Sugiura; Yoshifumi Okamoto; Takahiro Hiraoka; Tetsuro Oshika
Journal:  Retina       Date:  2015-10       Impact factor: 4.256

5.  Preferential hyperacuity perimeter and prognostic factors for metamorphopsia after idiopathic epiretinal membrane surgery.

Authors:  So Hyun Bae; Dongwook Kim; Tae Kwann Park; Jae Ryong Han; Hakyoung Kim; Wooho Nam
Journal:  Am J Ophthalmol       Date:  2012-09-27       Impact factor: 5.258

6.  Assessment of retinal layers and visual rehabilitation after epiretinal membrane removal.

Authors:  Jae Hui Kim; Se Woong Kang; Min Gui Kong; Hyo Shin Ha
Journal:  Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol       Date:  2012-08-09       Impact factor: 3.117

7.  Correlation between metamorphopsia and epiretinal membrane optical coherence tomography findings.

Authors:  Akinari Watanabe; Sachiko Arimoto; Okihiro Nishi
Journal:  Ophthalmology       Date:  2009-07-30       Impact factor: 12.079

8.  Vision-related quality of life and visual function after vitrectomy for various vitreoretinal disorders.

Authors:  Fumiki Okamoto; Yoshifumi Okamoto; Shinichi Fukuda; Takahiro Hiraoka; Tetsuro Oshika
Journal:  Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci       Date:  2009-10-08       Impact factor: 4.799

9.  Inner Nuclear Layer Thickness, a Biomarker of Metamorphopsia in Epiretinal Membrane, Correlates With Tangential Retinal Displacement.

Authors:  Yoshikazu Ichikawa; Yutaka Imamura; Masahiro Ishida
Journal:  Am J Ophthalmol       Date:  2018-06-08       Impact factor: 5.258

Review 10.  Metamorphopsia: An Overlooked Visual Symptom.

Authors:  Edoardo Midena; Stela Vujosevic
Journal:  Ophthalmic Res       Date:  2015-11-11       Impact factor: 2.892

View more
  2 in total

1.  Progression Patterns of Myopic Traction Maculopathy in the Fellow Eye After Pars Plana Vitrectomy of the Primary Eye.

Authors:  Kangjie Kong; Sisi Xu; Yingchao Wang; Yuhe Qi; Qing Chang; Rui Jiang; Chunhui Jiang; Xin Huang; Dekang Gan; Yanqiong Zhang; Ling Chen; Ling Wang; Xiaogang Luo; Yaowu Qin; Haixiang Wu; Min Zhou; Yingqin Ni; Gezhi Xu
Journal:  Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci       Date:  2021-12-01       Impact factor: 4.799

2.  Influence of Preoperative Foveal Layers' Thickness on Visual Function and Macular Morphology by Phacovitrectomy for Epiretinal Membrane.

Authors:  R Zhmurin; L Grajewski; L Krause
Journal:  J Ophthalmol       Date:  2022-08-25       Impact factor: 1.974

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.