Literature DB >> 33452761

Validity of the prognostication tool PREDICT version 2.2 in Japanese breast cancer patients.

Karen Zaguirre1,2, Masaya Kai1, Makoto Kubo1, Mai Yamada1, Kanako Kurata1, Hitomi Kawaji1, Kazuhisa Kaneshiro1, Yurina Harada1, Saori Hayashi1, Akiko Shimazaki1, Takafumi Morisaki1, Hitomi Mori1, Yoshinao Oda3, Sanmei Chen4, Taiki Moriyama1,5, Shuji Shimizu5, Masafumi Nakamura1.   

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: PREDICT is a prognostication tool that calculates the potential benefit of various postsurgical treatments on the overall survival (OS) of patients with nonmetastatic invasive breast cancer. Once patient, tumor, and treatment details have been entered, the tool will show the estimated 5-, 10-, and 15-year OS outcomes, both with and without adjuvant therapies. This study aimed to conduct an external validation of the prognostication tool PREDICT version 2.2 by evaluating its predictive accuracy of the 5- and 10-year OS outcomes among female patients with nonmetastatic invasive breast cancer in Japan.
METHODS: All female patients diagnosed from 2001 to 2013 with unilateral, nonmetastatic, invasive breast cancer and had undergone surgical treatment at Kyushu University Hospital, Fukuoka, Japan, were selected. Observed and predicted 5- and 10-year OS rates were analyzed for the validation population and the subgroups. Calibration and discriminatory accuracy were assessed using Chi-squared goodness-of-fit test and area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC).
RESULTS: A total of 636 eligible cases were selected from 1, 213 records. Predicted and observed OS differed by 0.9% (p = 0.322) for 5-year OS, and 2.4% (p = 0.086) for 10-year OS. Discriminatory accuracy results for 5-year (AUC = 0.707) and 10-year (AUC = 0.707) OS were fairly well.
CONCLUSION: PREDICT tool accurately estimated the 5- and 10-year OS in the overall Japanese study population. However, caution should be used for interpretation of the 5-year OS outcomes in patients that are ≥65 years old, and also for the 10-year OS outcomes in patients that are ≥65 years old, those with histologic grade 3 and Luminal A tumors, and in those considering ETx or no systemic treatment.
© 2021 The Authors. Cancer Medicine published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.

Entities:  

Keywords:  breast cancer; prognosis; survival; women's cancer

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2021        PMID: 33452761      PMCID: PMC7940221          DOI: 10.1002/cam4.3713

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cancer Med        ISSN: 2045-7634            Impact factor:   4.452


  26 in total

Review 1.  Progress and promise: highlights of the international expert consensus on the primary therapy of early breast cancer 2007.

Authors:  A Goldhirsch; W C Wood; R D Gelber; A S Coates; B Thürlimann; H-J Senn
Journal:  Ann Oncol       Date:  2007-07       Impact factor: 32.976

2.  Addressing overtreatment in breast cancer: The doctors' dilemma.

Authors:  Steven J Katz; Monica Morrow
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  2013-08-02       Impact factor: 6.860

3.  Adjuvant! Online is overoptimistic in predicting survival of Asian breast cancer patients.

Authors:  Nirmala Bhoo-Pathy; Cheng-Har Yip; Mikael Hartman; Nakul Saxena; Nur Aishah Taib; Gwo-Fuang Ho; Lai-Meng Looi; Awang M Bulgiba; Yolanda van der Graaf; Helena M Verkooijen
Journal:  Eur J Cancer       Date:  2012-02-25       Impact factor: 9.162

4.  Meeting highlights: international expert consensus on the primary therapy of early breast cancer 2005.

Authors:  A Goldhirsch; J H Glick; R D Gelber; A S Coates; B Thürlimann; H-J Senn
Journal:  Ann Oncol       Date:  2005-09-07       Impact factor: 32.976

5.  Computer program to assist in making decisions about adjuvant therapy for women with early breast cancer.

Authors:  P M Ravdin; L A Siminoff; G J Davis; M B Mercer; J Hewlett; N Gerson; H L Parker
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2001-02-15       Impact factor: 44.544

6.  Strategies for subtypes--dealing with the diversity of breast cancer: highlights of the St. Gallen International Expert Consensus on the Primary Therapy of Early Breast Cancer 2011.

Authors:  A Goldhirsch; W C Wood; A S Coates; R D Gelber; B Thürlimann; H-J Senn
Journal:  Ann Oncol       Date:  2011-06-27       Impact factor: 32.976

7.  Inclusion of KI67 significantly improves performance of the PREDICT prognostication and prediction model for early breast cancer.

Authors:  Gordon C Wishart; Emad Rakha; Andrew Green; Ian Ellis; Hamid Raza Ali; Elena Provenzano; Fiona M Blows; Carlos Caldas; Paul D P Pharoah
Journal:  BMC Cancer       Date:  2014-12-03       Impact factor: 4.430

8.  An updated PREDICT breast cancer prognostication and treatment benefit prediction model with independent validation.

Authors:  Francisco J Candido Dos Reis; Gordon C Wishart; Ed M Dicks; David Greenberg; Jem Rashbass; Marjanka K Schmidt; Alexandra J van den Broek; Ian O Ellis; Andrew Green; Emad Rakha; Tom Maishman; Diana M Eccles; Paul D P Pharoah
Journal:  Breast Cancer Res       Date:  2017-05-22       Impact factor: 6.466

9.  T-bet+ lymphocytes infiltration as an independent better prognostic indicator for triple-negative breast cancer.

Authors:  Hitomi Mori; Makoto Kubo; Masaya Kai; Mai Yamada; Kanako Kurata; Hitomi Kawaji; Kazuhisa Kaneshiro; Tomofumi Osako; Reiki Nishimura; Nobuyuki Arima; Masayuki Okido; Junji Kishimoto; Yoshinao Oda; Masafumi Nakamura
Journal:  Breast Cancer Res Treat       Date:  2019-05-08       Impact factor: 4.872

10.  Estimating the global cancer incidence and mortality in 2018: GLOBOCAN sources and methods.

Authors:  J Ferlay; M Colombet; I Soerjomataram; C Mathers; D M Parkin; M Piñeros; A Znaor; F Bray
Journal:  Int J Cancer       Date:  2018-12-06       Impact factor: 7.396

View more
  1 in total

1.  The Application and Comparison of Machine Learning Models for the Prediction of Breast Cancer Prognosis: Retrospective Cohort Study.

Authors:  Jialong Xiao; Miao Mo; Zezhou Wang; Changming Zhou; Jie Shen; Jing Yuan; Yulian He; Ying Zheng
Journal:  JMIR Med Inform       Date:  2022-02-18
  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.