Literature DB >> 33452657

Cyclophosphamide treatment in active multiple sclerosis.

Enrique Gómez-Figueroa1,2, Efrain Gutierrez-Lanz3, Alonso Alvarado-Bolaños3, Adriana Casallas-Vanegas3, Christian Garcia-Estrada3, Indhira Zabala-Angeles3, Arturo Cadena-Fernandez4, Rivas-Alonso Veronica3, Treviño-Frenk Irene5, José Flores-Rivera6,7.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: Cyclophosphamide (CYC) is an alkylating agent with immunosuppressive effect by inhibiting DNA synthesis and producing apoptosis used in many autoimmune diseases, including multiple sclerosis (MS). Here, we analyze the efficacy of CYC treatment in relapsing-remitting (RRMS) and active secondary progressive MS (SPMS) in our center with a monthly scheme.
METHODS: Patients with MS treated with CYC and a follow up of at least 36 months were eligible for inclusion. All participants had received a standard CYC regimen. The EDSS score mean annualized relapse rate (ARR) and progression index (PI) were measured as efficacy outcomes at 12, 24, and 36 months. Outcomes were also analyzed comparing disease course and activity.
RESULTS: A total of 16 patients were included (50% male, 18.75% RRMS and 81.25% SPMS). EDSS remained stable along the follow-up period, with 62.5% improving or maintaining the same EDSS score at 12 months. PI decreased 14% and 21% at 12 and 24-36 months of follow-up, respectively. ARR decreased 20% after 12 months, 19% after 24 months, and 30.23% after 36 months. Median differences in ARR were higher in patients with high relapse activity (0.60 vs 0.07, p = 0.001) and malignant course (0.60 vs 0.17, p = 0.027). PI also differed with higher mean differences in patients with high relapse activity (0.70 vs 0.03, p = 0.016) and malignant course (1.17 vs 0.03, p = 0.003).
CONCLUSIONS: CYC continues to be a valid therapeutic option, especially in regions with limited access to high-efficiency therapies particularly in patients with high relapsing activity and malignant course.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Active multiple sclerosis; Cyclophosphamide; Efficacy

Year:  2021        PMID: 33452657     DOI: 10.1007/s10072-021-05052-1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Neurol Sci        ISSN: 1590-1874            Impact factor:   3.307


  26 in total

1.  Treatment of the chronic progressive form of multiple sclerosis with a combination of cyclophosphamide and prednisone.

Authors:  O R Hommes; J J Prick; K J Lamers
Journal:  Clin Neurol Neurosurg       Date:  1975       Impact factor: 1.876

Review 2.  Multiple sclerosis.

Authors:  Alan J Thompson; Sergio E Baranzini; Jeroen Geurts; Bernhard Hemmer; Olga Ciccarelli
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  2018-03-23       Impact factor: 79.321

3.  The impact of blinding on the results of a randomized, placebo-controlled multiple sclerosis clinical trial.

Authors:  J H Noseworthy; G C Ebers; M K Vandervoort; R E Farquhar; E Yetisir; R Roberts
Journal:  Neurology       Date:  1994-01       Impact factor: 9.910

4.  Intensive immunosuppression in progressive multiple sclerosis. A randomized, three-arm study of high-dose intravenous cyclophosphamide, plasma exchange, and ACTH.

Authors:  S L Hauser; D M Dawson; J R Lehrich; M F Beal; S V Kevy; R D Propper; J A Mills; H L Weiner
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  1983-01-27       Impact factor: 91.245

Review 5.  Economics and Cost-Effectiveness of Multiple Sclerosis Therapies in the USA.

Authors:  Daniel M Hartung
Journal:  Neurotherapeutics       Date:  2017-10       Impact factor: 7.620

Review 6.  The effect of cyclophosphamide on the immune system: implications for clinical cancer therapy.

Authors:  Martina Ahlmann; Georg Hempel
Journal:  Cancer Chemother Pharmacol       Date:  2016-09-19       Impact factor: 3.333

Review 7.  Treatment of multiple sclerosis with cyclophosphamide: critical review of clinical and immunologic effects.

Authors:  H L Weiner; J A Cohen
Journal:  Mult Scler       Date:  2002-04       Impact factor: 6.312

8.  Intermittent cyclophosphamide pulse therapy in progressive multiple sclerosis: final report of the Northeast Cooperative Multiple Sclerosis Treatment Group.

Authors:  H L Weiner; G A Mackin; E J Orav; D A Hafler; D M Dawson; Y LaPierre; R Herndon; J R Lehrich; S L Hauser; A Turel
Journal:  Neurology       Date:  1993-05       Impact factor: 9.910

Review 9.  The safety profile of cyclophosphamide in multiple sclerosis therapy.

Authors:  Paola Perini; Massimiliano Calabrese; Luciano Rinaldi; Paolo Gallo
Journal:  Expert Opin Drug Saf       Date:  2007-03       Impact factor: 4.250

10.  Multiple sclerosis.

Authors:  Alastair Compston; Alasdair Coles
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  2008-10-25       Impact factor: 79.321

View more
  3 in total

Review 1.  Cannabinoid and endocannabinoid system: a promising therapeutic intervention for multiple sclerosis.

Authors:  Hina Khan; Fareeha Khalid Ghori; Uzma Ghani; Aneela Javed; Saadia Zahid
Journal:  Mol Biol Rep       Date:  2022-02-18       Impact factor: 2.742

2.  Effects of compound small peptides of Chinese medicine on intestinal immunity and cecal intestinal flora in CTX immunosuppressed mice.

Authors:  Yuqing Cui; Lu Zhang; Chunyu Lu; Mengmeng Dou; Yulan Jiao; Yongzhan Bao; Wanyu Shi
Journal:  Front Microbiol       Date:  2022-07-25       Impact factor: 6.064

3.  Autologous haematopoietic stem cell transplantation versus low-dose immunosuppression in secondary-progressive multiple sclerosis.

Authors:  Alice Mariottini; Giovanni Bulgarini; Benedetta Forci; Chiara Innocenti; Fabrizia Mealli; Alessandra Mattei; Chiara Ceccarelli; Anna Maria Repice; Alessandro Barilaro; Claudia Mechi; Riccardo Saccardi; Luca Massacesi
Journal:  Eur J Neurol       Date:  2022-02-28       Impact factor: 6.288

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.