Jaime Feliu1, Mónica Jorge Fernández2, Teresa Macarulla3, Bartomeu Massuti4, Ana Albero5, José Federico González González6, Guillermo Quintero-Aldana7, Juan Ignacio Delgado-Mingorance8, Ana Fernández Montes9, Carmen García Piernavieja10, Manuel Valladares-Ayerbes11, Ana María López Muñoz12, Rebeca Mondéjar Solís13, Pilar Vicente14, Esther Casado Gonzalez15, Irene González Cebrián16, Guillermo López-Vivanco17. 1. Medical Oncology Department, IdiPAZ, CIBERONC, Cátedra UAM-AMGEN, Hospital Universitario La Paz, Paseo de la Castellana 261., 28046, Madrid, Spain. jaimefeliu@hotmail.com. 2. Medical Oncology Department, Hospital Álvaro Cunqueiro, Vigo, Spain. 3. Medical Oncology Department, Vall d'Hebrón University Hospital and Vall d'Hebrón Institute of Oncology, IOB Quirón, Barcelona, Spain. 4. Medical Oncology Department, Alicante University Hospital ISABIAL, Alicante, Spain. 5. Medical Oncology Department, Hospital Virgen Macarena, Sevilla, Spain. 6. Medical Oncology Department, Hospital Universitario Quirónsalud Madrid, Madrid, Spain. 7. Medical Oncology Department, Hospital Universitario Lucus Augusti (HULA), Lugo, Spain. 8. Medical Oncology Department, Hospital Universitario Badajoz, Badajoz, Spain. 9. Medical Oncology Department, Complexo Hospitalario Universitario de Ourense, Ourense, Spain. 10. Medical Oncology Department, Hospital Insular de Gran Canaria, Las Palmas de Gran Canaria, Spain. 11. Medical Oncology Department, Instituto de Biomedicina de Sevilla, Hospital Universitario Virgen del Rocio, Sevilla, Spain. 12. Medical Oncology Department, Hospital Universitario de Burgos, Burgos, Spain. 13. Medical Oncology Department, Hospital Universitario La Princesa, Madrid, Spain. 14. Medical Oncology Department, Hospital Granollers, Granollers, Spain. 15. Medical Oncology Department, Hospital Althaia, Manresa, Spain. 16. Digestive Cancer Department, San Cecilio Hospital, Granada, Spain. 17. Medical Oncology Department, Hospital Universitario Cruces, Barakaldo, Spain.
Abstract
PURPOSE: To evaluate the health-related quality of life (HRQoL), global health status (GHS), and deterioration-free survival of an elderly population (> 70 years) with unresectable locally advanced (LAPC) or metastatic pancreatic cancer (mPC) treated with nab-paclitaxel in combination with gemcitabine. METHODS: In this open-label, single-arm, multicenter, phase II trial, patients received 4-week cycles of intravenous (i.v.) nab-paclitaxel at a dose of 125 mg/m2, followed by i.v. injections of gemcitabine at a dose of 1000 mg/m2 on days 1, 8 and 15 until disease progression or unacceptable toxicity was observed. The primary outcome was the HRQoL (deterioration-free rate at 3 months as evaluated with the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire C30. RESULTS: Eighty patients (median age: 74.6 years) were enrolled (56 with mPC, 24 with LAPC). The percentage of patients who had not experienced deterioration at 3 months was 54.3% (95% CI 41.6-67.0%). The median (interquartile range) time until definite deterioration was 1.6 (1.1-3.7) months. The objective response rate and clinical benefit rate were achieved by 11 (13.8%, 95% CI 6.2-21.3%) and 54 patients (67.5%, 95% CI 57.2-77.8%), respectively. The median overall survival was 9.2 months (95% CI 6.9-11.5), and the median progression-free survival was 7.2 months (95% CI 5.8-8.5). Only fatigue and neutropenia demonstrated a grade 3-4 toxicity incidence > 20%. CONCLUSIONS: Our study confirms the clinical benefit of the combination of nab-paclitaxel and gemcitabine in an elderly population with pancreatic cancer in terms of improved survival and clinical response. However, we were unable to confirm a benefit in terms of quality-of-life.
PURPOSE: To evaluate the health-related quality of life (HRQoL), global health status (GHS), and deterioration-free survival of an elderly population (> 70 years) with unresectable locally advanced (LAPC) or metastatic pancreatic cancer (mPC) treated with nab-paclitaxel in combination with gemcitabine. METHODS: In this open-label, single-arm, multicenter, phase II trial, patients received 4-week cycles of intravenous (i.v.) nab-paclitaxel at a dose of 125 mg/m2, followed by i.v. injections of gemcitabine at a dose of 1000 mg/m2 on days 1, 8 and 15 until disease progression or unacceptable toxicity was observed. The primary outcome was the HRQoL (deterioration-free rate at 3 months as evaluated with the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire C30. RESULTS: Eighty patients (median age: 74.6 years) were enrolled (56 with mPC, 24 with LAPC). The percentage of patients who had not experienced deterioration at 3 months was 54.3% (95% CI 41.6-67.0%). The median (interquartile range) time until definite deterioration was 1.6 (1.1-3.7) months. The objective response rate and clinical benefit rate were achieved by 11 (13.8%, 95% CI 6.2-21.3%) and 54 patients (67.5%, 95% CI 57.2-77.8%), respectively. The median overall survival was 9.2 months (95% CI 6.9-11.5), and the median progression-free survival was 7.2 months (95% CI 5.8-8.5). Only fatigue and neutropenia demonstrated a grade 3-4 toxicity incidence > 20%. CONCLUSIONS: Our study confirms the clinical benefit of the combination of nab-paclitaxel and gemcitabine in an elderly population with pancreatic cancer in terms of improved survival and clinical response. However, we were unable to confirm a benefit in terms of quality-of-life.
Entities:
Keywords:
Deterioration-free survival; Elderly; Gemcitabine; Global health status; Health-related quality of life; Metastatic; Nab-paclitaxel; Pancreatic cancer; Unresectable locally advanced
Authors: M Ducreux; A Sa Cuhna; C Caramella; A Hollebecque; P Burtin; D Goéré; T Seufferlein; K Haustermans; J L Van Laethem; T Conroy; D Arnold Journal: Ann Oncol Date: 2015-09 Impact factor: 32.976
Authors: Thierry Conroy; Françoise Desseigne; Marc Ychou; Olivier Bouché; Rosine Guimbaud; Yves Bécouarn; Antoine Adenis; Jean-Luc Raoul; Sophie Gourgou-Bourgade; Christelle de la Fouchardière; Jaafar Bennouna; Jean-Baptiste Bachet; Faiza Khemissa-Akouz; Denis Péré-Vergé; Catherine Delbaldo; Eric Assenat; Bruno Chauffert; Pierre Michel; Christine Montoto-Grillot; Michel Ducreux Journal: N Engl J Med Date: 2011-05-12 Impact factor: 91.245
Authors: Margaret A Tempero; Mokenge P Malafa; Mahmoud Al-Hawary; Horacio Asbun; Andrew Bain; Stephen W Behrman; Al B Benson; Ellen Binder; Dana B Cardin; Charles Cha; E Gabriela Chiorean; Vincent Chung; Brian Czito; Mary Dillhoff; Efrat Dotan; Cristina R Ferrone; Jeffrey Hardacre; William G Hawkins; Joseph Herman; Andrew H Ko; Srinadh Komanduri; Albert Koong; Noelle LoConte; Andrew M Lowy; Cassadie Moravek; Eric K Nakakura; Eileen M O'Reilly; Jorge Obando; Sushanth Reddy; Courtney Scaife; Sarah Thayer; Colin D Weekes; Robert A Wolff; Brian M Wolpin; Jennifer Burns; Susan Darlow Journal: J Natl Compr Canc Netw Date: 2017-08 Impact factor: 11.908
Authors: Ahmedin Jemal; Freddie Bray; Melissa M Center; Jacques Ferlay; Elizabeth Ward; David Forman Journal: CA Cancer J Clin Date: 2011-02-04 Impact factor: 508.702
Authors: Andrew McGuigan; Paul Kelly; Richard C Turkington; Claire Jones; Helen G Coleman; R Stephen McCain Journal: World J Gastroenterol Date: 2018-11-21 Impact factor: 5.742
Authors: Francisco Rodríguez; Pablo Caruana; Noa De la Fuente; Pía Español; María Gámez; Josep Balart; Elisa Llurba; Ramón Rovira; Raúl Ruiz; Cristina Martín-Lorente; José Luis Corchero; María Virtudes Céspedes Journal: Biomolecules Date: 2022-06-04