Literature DB >> 33452327

Structural variability and differentiation of niches in the rhizosphere and endosphere bacterial microbiome of moso bamboo (Phyllostachys edulis).

Zong-Sheng Yuan1, Fang Liu2, Zhen-Yu Liu3, Qiu-Liang Huang4, Guo-Fang Zhang4, Hui Pan5.   

Abstract

The plant microbiota play a key role in plant productivity, nutrient uptake, resistance to stress and flowering. The flowering of moso bamboo has been a focus of study. The mechanism of flowering is related to nutrient uptake, temperature, hormone balance and regulation of key genes. However, the connection between microbiota of moso bamboo and its flowering is unknown. In this study, samples of rhizosphere soil, rhizomes, roots and leaves of flowering and nonflowering plants were collected, and 16S rRNA amplicon Illumina sequencing was utilized to separate the bacterial communities associated with different flowering stages of moso bamboo. We identified 5442 OTUs, and the number of rhizosphere soil OTUs was much higher than those of other samples. Principal component analysis (PCA) and hierarchical clustering (Bray Curtis dis) analysis revealed that the bacterial microorganisms related to rhizosphere soil and endophytic tissues of moso bamboo differed significantly from those in bulk soil and rhizobacterial and endosphere microbiomes. In addition, the PCA analyses of root and rhizosphere soil revealed different structures of microbial communities between bamboo that is flowering and not flowering. Through the analysis of core microorganisms, it was found that Flavobacterium, Bacillus and Stenotrophomonas played an important role in the absorption of N elements, which may affect the flowering time of moso bamboo. Our results delineate the complex host-microbe interactions of this plant. We also discuss the potential influence of bacterial microbiome in flowering, which can provide a basis for the development and utilization of moso bamboo.

Entities:  

Year:  2021        PMID: 33452327      PMCID: PMC7810855          DOI: 10.1038/s41598-021-80971-9

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Sci Rep        ISSN: 2045-2322            Impact factor:   4.379


  38 in total

1.  Properties of bacterial endophytes and their proposed role in plant growth.

Authors:  Pablo R Hardoim; Leo S van Overbeek; Jan Dirk van Elsas
Journal:  Trends Microbiol       Date:  2008-09-12       Impact factor: 17.079

2.  Deciphering the rhizosphere microbiome for disease-suppressive bacteria.

Authors:  Rodrigo Mendes; Marco Kruijt; Irene de Bruijn; Ester Dekkers; Menno van der Voort; Johannes H M Schneider; Yvette M Piceno; Todd Z DeSantis; Gary L Andersen; Peter A H M Bakker; Jos M Raaijmakers
Journal:  Science       Date:  2011-05-05       Impact factor: 47.728

Review 3.  Microbiome engineering to improve biocontrol and plant growth-promoting mechanisms.

Authors:  Ma Del Carmen Orozco-Mosqueda; Ma Del Carmen Rocha-Granados; Bernard R Glick; Gustavo Santoyo
Journal:  Microbiol Res       Date:  2018-01-31       Impact factor: 5.415

Review 4.  Regulation of nitrogen metabolism in Bacillus subtilis: vive la différence!

Authors:  S H Fisher
Journal:  Mol Microbiol       Date:  1999-04       Impact factor: 3.501

5.  Clonal structure and flowering traits of a bamboo [Phyllostachys pubescens (Mazel) Ohwi] stand grown from a simultaneous flowering as revealed by AFLP analysis.

Authors:  Y Isagi; K Shimada; H Kushima; N Tanaka; A Nagao; T Ishikawa; H OnoDera; S Watanabe
Journal:  Mol Ecol       Date:  2004-07       Impact factor: 6.185

6.  Revealing structure and assembly cues for Arabidopsis root-inhabiting bacterial microbiota.

Authors:  Davide Bulgarelli; Matthias Rott; Klaus Schlaeppi; Emiel Ver Loren van Themaat; Nahal Ahmadinejad; Federica Assenza; Philipp Rauf; Bruno Huettel; Richard Reinhardt; Elmon Schmelzer; Joerg Peplies; Frank Oliver Gloeckner; Rudolf Amann; Thilo Eickhorst; Paul Schulze-Lefert
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2012-08-02       Impact factor: 49.962

7.  The under-recognized dominance of Verrucomicrobia in soil bacterial communities.

Authors:  Gaddy T Bergmann; Scott T Bates; Kathryn G Eilers; Christian L Lauber; J Gregory Caporaso; William A Walters; Rob Knight; Noah Fierer
Journal:  Soil Biol Biochem       Date:  2011-07       Impact factor: 7.609

8.  Environmental and gut bacteroidetes: the food connection.

Authors:  François Thomas; Jan-Hendrik Hehemann; Etienne Rebuffet; Mirjam Czjzek; Gurvan Michel
Journal:  Front Microbiol       Date:  2011-05-30       Impact factor: 5.640

9.  Structural variability and niche differentiation in the rhizosphere and endosphere bacterial microbiome of field-grown poplar trees.

Authors:  Bram Beckers; Michiel Op De Beeck; Nele Weyens; Wout Boerjan; Jaco Vangronsveld
Journal:  Microbiome       Date:  2017-02-23       Impact factor: 14.650

Review 10.  The rhizosphere microbiome and plant health.

Authors:  Roeland L Berendsen; Corné M J Pieterse; Peter A H M Bakker
Journal:  Trends Plant Sci       Date:  2012-05-05       Impact factor: 18.313

View more
  3 in total

1.  Bacterial community structure of the sunflower (Helianthus annuus) endosphere.

Authors:  Bartholomew Saanu Adeleke; Ayansina Segun Ayangbenro; Olubukola Oluranti Babalola
Journal:  Plant Signal Behav       Date:  2021-09-30

2.  Temporally Selective Modification of the Tomato Rhizosphere and Root Microbiome by Volcanic Ash Fertilizer Containing Micronutrients.

Authors:  Elijah C Mehlferber; Kent F McCue; Jon E Ferrel; Britt Koskella; Rajnish Khanna
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2022-03-21       Impact factor: 5.005

3.  Environmental filtering drives the establishment of the distinctive rhizosphere, bulk, and root nodule bacterial communities of Sophora davidii in hilly and gully regions of the Loess Plateau of China.

Authors:  Li Jing; Ai Jia-Min; Liu Xiao-Dong; Jiang Ying-Ying; Zheng Chao-Chao; Zhao Rui-Hua; Deng Zhen-Shan
Journal:  Front Microbiol       Date:  2022-07-22       Impact factor: 6.064

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.