Literature DB >> 33451846

Looking beyond the eyeball test: A novel vitality index to predict recovery after esophagectomy.

Andrew Tang1, Usman Ahmad1, Siva Raja1, Jesse Rappaport1, Daniel P Raymond1, Monisha Sudarshan1, Alejandro C Bribriesco1, Eugene H Blackstone2, Sudish C Murthy3.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: To (1) measure 4 physiologic metrics before esophagectomy, (2) use these in an index to predict composite postoperative outcome after esophagectomy, and (3) compare predictive accuracy of this index to that of the Fried Frailty Index and Modified Frailty Index.
METHODS: Grip strength (kilograms), 30-second chair sit-stands (number), 6-minute walk distance (meters), and normalized psoas muscle area (cm2/m) were measured for 77 consenting patients from January 1, 2018, to April 1, 2019. Imbalanced random forest classification estimated probability of a composite postoperative outcome, which included mortality, respiratory complications, anastomotic leak, delirium, length of stay ≥14 days, discharge to nursing facility, and readmission. G-mean error was used to compare predictive accuracy among indexes.
RESULTS: Median grip strength was 38 kg (25th-75th percentiles, 31-44), number of sit-stands 11 (10-14), psoas muscle area to height ratio 6.9 cm2/m (6.0-8.2), and 6-minute walk distance 407 m (368-451). There was generally weak correlation between these metrics, with the highest between 30-second sit-stands and 6-minute walk distance (r = 0.57). Age, degree of patient-reported exhaustion, and the 4 objective metrics comprised the Esophageal Vitality Index, which had a lower G-mean error of 32% (31-33) than the Fried Frailty Index, 37% (37-38), and the Modified Frailty Index, 48% (47-48).
CONCLUSIONS: The Esophageal Vitality Index, an objective, simple assessment consisting of grip strength, 30-second chair sit-stands, 6-minute walk, and psoas muscle area to height ratio outperformed commonly used frailty indexes in predicting postesophagectomy mortality and morbidity. The index provides a robust picture of patients' fitness for surgery beyond the qualitative "eyeball" test.
Copyright © 2020 The American Association for Thoracic Surgery. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Esophageal Vitality Index; complications; esophageal cancer; esophagectomy; frailty

Mesh:

Year:  2020        PMID: 33451846      PMCID: PMC8715769          DOI: 10.1016/j.jtcvs.2020.10.122

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg        ISSN: 0022-5223            Impact factor:   5.209


  15 in total

1.  Random Forest Missing Data Algorithms.

Authors:  Fei Tang; Hemant Ishwaran
Journal:  Stat Anal Data Min       Date:  2017-06-13       Impact factor: 1.051

2.  Quantifying Sarcopenia Reference Values Using Lumbar and Thoracic Muscle Areas in a Healthy Population.

Authors:  B A Derstine; S A Holcombe; R L Goulson; B E Ross; N C Wang; J A Sullivan; G L Su; S C Wang
Journal:  J Nutr Health Aging       Date:  2017       Impact factor: 4.075

3.  Perioperative prehabilitation and rehabilitation in esophagogastric malignancies: a systematic review.

Authors:  Jarlath C Bolger; Lisa Loughney; Roisin Tully; Melanie Cunningham; Shane Keogh; Noel McCaffrey; Wendy Hickey; William B Robb
Journal:  Dis Esophagus       Date:  2019-11-13       Impact factor: 3.429

4.  Use of the Modified Frailty Index in the American College of Surgeons National Surgical Improvement Program Database: Highlighting the Problem of Missing Data.

Authors:  Faiz Gani; Joseph K Canner; Timothy M Pawlik
Journal:  JAMA Surg       Date:  2017-02-01       Impact factor: 14.766

5.  A Random Forests Quantile Classifier for Class Imbalanced Data.

Authors:  Robert O'Brien; Hemant Ishwaran
Journal:  Pattern Recognit       Date:  2019-01-29       Impact factor: 7.740

6.  The Society of Thoracic Surgeons General Thoracic Surgery Database 2018 Update on Outcomes and Quality.

Authors:  Christopher W Seder; Daniel Raymond; Cameron D Wright; Henning A Gaissert; Andrew C Chang; Susan Becker; Varun Puri; Robert Welsh; William Burfeind; Felix G Fernandez; Lisa M Brown; Benjamin D Kozower
Journal:  Ann Thorac Surg       Date:  2018-03-05       Impact factor: 4.330

7.  New 5-Factor Modified Frailty Index Using American College of Surgeons NSQIP Data.

Authors:  Sneha Subramaniam; Jeffrey J Aalberg; Rainier P Soriano; Celia M Divino
Journal:  J Am Coll Surg       Date:  2017-11-16       Impact factor: 6.113

8.  Accumulating deficits model of frailty and postoperative mortality and morbidity: its application to a national database.

Authors:  Vic Velanovich; Heath Antoine; Andrew Swartz; David Peters; Ilan Rubinfeld
Journal:  J Surg Res       Date:  2013-02-01       Impact factor: 2.192

9.  A global clinical measure of fitness and frailty in elderly people.

Authors:  Kenneth Rockwood; Xiaowei Song; Chris MacKnight; Howard Bergman; David B Hogan; Ian McDowell; Arnold Mitnitski
Journal:  CMAJ       Date:  2005-08-30       Impact factor: 8.262

Review 10.  Frailty assessment in thoracic surgery.

Authors:  Michael John Dunne; Udo Abah; Marco Scarci
Journal:  Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg       Date:  2014-01-27
View more
  3 in total

1.  Association of frailty with clinical and financial outcomes of esophagectomy hospitalizations in the United States.

Authors:  Mina G Park; Greg Haro; Russyan Mark Mabeza; Sara Sakowitz; Arjun Verma; Cory Lee; Catherine Williamson; Peyman Benharash
Journal:  Surg Open Sci       Date:  2022-05-19

2.  Commentary: Surgical risk assessment in 2020: Is a handshake and a walking test really the best we've got?

Authors:  Ernest G Chan; Chigozirim N Ekeke; James D Luketich
Journal:  J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg       Date:  2020-11-20       Impact factor: 5.209

3.  Select octogenarians with stage IIIa non-small cell lung cancer can benefit from trimodality therapy.

Authors:  Andrew Tang; Andrew Feczko; Sudish C Murthy; Siva Raja; Alejandro Bribriesco; Dean Schraufnagel; Usman Ahmad; Daniel P Raymond; Monisha Sudarshan
Journal:  JTCVS Open       Date:  2022-02-23
  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.