Miss Charlotte L Moss1, Ajay Aggarwal2,3, Asad Qureshi2, Benjamin Taylor2, Teresa Guerrero-Urbano2, Mieke Van Hemelrijck4. 1. King's College London, School of Cancer and Pharmaceutical Sciences, Translational Oncology and Urology Research (TOUR), Guy's Hospital, 3rd Floor Bermondsey Wing, Great Maze Pond, London, SE1 9RT, UK. charlotte.moss@kcl.ac.uk. 2. Comprehensive Cancer Centre, Guy's and St Thomas' NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK. 3. Department of Health Services Research and Policy, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, London, UK. 4. King's College London, School of Cancer and Pharmaceutical Sciences, Translational Oncology and Urology Research (TOUR), Guy's Hospital, 3rd Floor Bermondsey Wing, Great Maze Pond, London, SE1 9RT, UK.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Patient reported outcome measurements (PROMs) are emerging as an important component of patient management in the cancer setting, providing broad perspectives on patients' quality of life and experience. The use of PROMs is, however, generally limited to the context of randomised control trials, as healthcare services are challenged to sustain high quality of care whilst facing increasing demand and financial shortfalls. We performed a systematic review of the literature to identify any oncological benefit of using PROMs and investigate the wider impact on patient experience, in cancers of the pelvic abdominal cavity specifically. METHODS: A systematic review of the literature was conducted using MEDLINE (Pubmed) and Ovid Gateway (Embase and Ovid) until April 2020. Studies investigating the oncological outcomes of PROMs were deemed suitable for inclusion. RESULTS: A total of 21 studies were included from 2167 screened articles. Various domains of quality of life (QoL) were identified as potential prognosticators for oncologic outcomes in cancers of the pelvic abdominal cavity, independent of other clinicopathological features of disease: 3 studies identified global QoL as a prognostic factor, 6 studies identified physical and role functioning, and 2 studies highlighted fatigue. In addition to improved outcomes, a number of included studies also reported that the use of PROMs enhanced both patient-clinician communication and patient satisfaction with care in the clinical setting. CONCLUSIONS: This review highlights the necessity of routine collection of PROMs within the pelvic abdominal cancer setting to improve patient quality of life and outcomes.
BACKGROUND:Patient reported outcome measurements (PROMs) are emerging as an important component of patient management in the cancer setting, providing broad perspectives on patients' quality of life and experience. The use of PROMs is, however, generally limited to the context of randomised control trials, as healthcare services are challenged to sustain high quality of care whilst facing increasing demand and financial shortfalls. We performed a systematic review of the literature to identify any oncological benefit of using PROMs and investigate the wider impact on patient experience, in cancers of the pelvic abdominal cavity specifically. METHODS: A systematic review of the literature was conducted using MEDLINE (Pubmed) and Ovid Gateway (Embase and Ovid) until April 2020. Studies investigating the oncological outcomes of PROMs were deemed suitable for inclusion. RESULTS: A total of 21 studies were included from 2167 screened articles. Various domains of quality of life (QoL) were identified as potential prognosticators for oncologic outcomes in cancers of the pelvic abdominal cavity, independent of other clinicopathological features of disease: 3 studies identified global QoL as a prognostic factor, 6 studies identified physical and role functioning, and 2 studies highlighted fatigue. In addition to improved outcomes, a number of included studies also reported that the use of PROMs enhanced both patient-clinician communication and patient satisfaction with care in the clinical setting. CONCLUSIONS: This review highlights the necessity of routine collection of PROMs within the pelvic abdominal cancer setting to improve patient quality of life and outcomes.
Entities:
Keywords:
Health related quality of life; Overall survival; Patient reported outcome measurements; Pelvic abdominal cancers; Prognostic factors
Authors: Chee-Chee H Stucky; Barbara A Pockaj; Paul J Novotny; Jeff A Sloan; Daniel J Sargent; Michael J O'Connell; Robert W Beart; John M Skibber; Heidi Nelson; Jane C Weeks Journal: Ann Surg Oncol Date: 2011-03-31 Impact factor: 5.344
Authors: James C Coyne; Thomas F Pajak; Jonathan Harris; Andre Konski; Benjamin Movsas; Kian Ang; Deborah Watkins Bruner Journal: Cancer Date: 2007-12-01 Impact factor: 6.860
Authors: Bernardo Perez Villa; Sultan Alotaibi; Nicolas Brozzi; Kurt P Spindler; Jose Navia; Jaime Hernandez-Montfort Journal: J Patient Rep Outcomes Date: 2022-03-16