Literature DB >> 33451066

Alternative Protein Sources vs. GM Soybean Meal as Feedstuff for Pigs-Meat Quality and Health-Promoting Indicators.

Marcin Sońta1, Anna Rekiel1, Justyna Więcek1, Martyna Batorska1, Kamila Puppel1.   

Abstract

This study aimed to explain the possibility of partial replacement of genetically-modified soybean meal (SBM GM) with pea seeds and rapeseed meal (RSM) in complete feed mixtures for growing-finishing pigs and to determine its impact on meat quality and health-promoting indices. The pigs (n = 50) were randomly divided into five groups, 10 animals each (gilts and barrows, 1:1, 3-breed: ♀ (landrace × yorkshire) × ♂ duroc), including the control group (C) and four experimental groups (E1, E2, E3, E4), and fed complete feed mixtures. The SBM GM was the only protein source in feed mixtures for control pigs. In feed mixtures for E1-E4 groups, it was partially replaced with pea seed doses of 5.0%, 10.0%, 15.0%, and 17.5% in groups E1, E2, E3, and E4, respectively. The feed mixtures were iso-energetic and iso-protein. After completed fattening, the animals were slaughtered. M. longissimus lumborum was sampled for analyses of the chemical and physical traits. The fatty acid profile determined in intramuscular fat (IMF) was used to compute the values of the health-promoting indices. The chemical and physical characteristics of meat were comparable in all groups. The study showed a dietetically-beneficial decrease in the values of atherogenicity index (AI), thrombogenicity index (TI), and saturation (S/P) in the meat of the experimental pigs vs. control group. The values of most of the analyzed quality attributes of pork justify using alternative protein sources as partial SBM GM replacers in diets for growing-finishing pigs in sustainable animal production.

Entities:  

Keywords:  alternative protein sources; fatteners; health-promoting indices; meat quality; sustainable feed

Year:  2021        PMID: 33451066      PMCID: PMC7828514          DOI: 10.3390/ani11010177

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Animals (Basel)        ISSN: 2076-2615            Impact factor:   2.752


  12 in total

1.  Summary of the scientific conference on dietary fatty acids and cardiovascular health: conference summary from the nutrition committee of the American Heart Association.

Authors:  P Kris-Etherton; S R Daniels; R H Eckel; M Engler; B V Howard; R M Krauss; A H Lichtenstein; F Sacks; S St Jeor; M Stampfer; R H Eckel; S M Grundy; L J Appel; T Byers; H Campos; G Cooney; M A Denke; B V Howard; E Kennedy; R M Krauss; P Kris-Etherton; A H Lichtenstein; P Marckmann; T A Pearson; G Riccardi; L L Rudel; M Rudrum; F Sacks; D T Stein; R P Tracy; V Ursin; R A Vogel; P L Zock; T L Bazzarre; J Clark
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  2001-02-20       Impact factor: 29.690

2.  Reference methods for the assessment of physical characteristics of meat.

Authors:  K O Honikel
Journal:  Meat Sci       Date:  1998-08       Impact factor: 5.209

3.  Effects of dietary inclusion of pea and faba bean as a replacement for soybean meal on grower and finisher pig performance and carcass quality.

Authors:  L A Smith; J G M Houdijk; D Homer; I Kyriazakis
Journal:  J Anim Sci       Date:  2013-05-08       Impact factor: 3.159

Review 4.  Coronary heart disease: seven dietary factors.

Authors:  T L Ulbricht; D A Southgate
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  1991-10-19       Impact factor: 79.321

Review 5.  A review of nutritional effects on fat composition of animal products with special emphasis on n-3 polyunsaturated fatty acids.

Authors:  Maryline Kouba; Jacques Mourot
Journal:  Biochimie       Date:  2010-02-25       Impact factor: 4.079

6.  The influence of dietary field peas (Pisum sativum L.) on pig performance, carcass quality, and the palatability of pork.

Authors:  H H Stein; A K R Everts; K K Sweeter; D N Peters; R J Maddock; D M Wulf; C Pedersen
Journal:  J Anim Sci       Date:  2006-11       Impact factor: 3.159

7.  Influence of partial replacement of soya bean meal by faba beans or peas in heavy pigs diet on meat quality, residual anti-nutritional factors and phytoestrogen content.

Authors:  Domenico Gatta; Claudia Russo; Lorella Giuliotti; Claudio Mannari; Piero Picciarelli; Lara Lombardi; Luca Giovannini; Nello Ceccarelli; Lorenzo Mariotti
Journal:  Arch Anim Nutr       Date:  2013-06       Impact factor: 2.242

8.  The relationship between the chemical composition of the carcass and the fatty acid composition of intramuscular fat and backfat of several pig breeds slaughtered at different weights.

Authors:  St Raj; G Skiba; D Weremko; H Fandrejewski; W Migdał; F Borowiec; E Poławska
Journal:  Meat Sci       Date:  2010-10       Impact factor: 5.209

9.  Influence of linseed variety on fatty acid profile in cow's milk.

Authors:  Kamila Puppel; Beata Kuczyńska; Teresa Nałęcz-Tarwacka; Henryk Grodzki
Journal:  J Sci Food Agric       Date:  2013-02-08       Impact factor: 3.638

10.  Quenching of intracellular ROS generation as a mechanism for oleate-induced reduction of endothelial activation and early atherogenesis.

Authors:  Marika Massaro; Giuseppina Basta; Guido Lazzerini; Maria Annunziata Carluccio; Francesca Bosetti; Giancarlo Solaini; Francesco Visioli; Aldo Paolicchi; Raffaele De Caterina
Journal:  Thromb Haemost       Date:  2002-08       Impact factor: 5.249

View more
  2 in total

1.  Influence of an increased content of pea and yellow lupin protein in the diet of pigs on meat quality.

Authors:  Aleksandra Cebulska; Hanna Jankowiak; Eva Weisbauerová; Pavel Nevrkla
Journal:  Porcine Health Manag       Date:  2021-12-19

2.  Locally Grown Crops and Immunocastration in Fattening Heavy Pigs: Effects on Performance and Welfare.

Authors:  Immaculada Argemí-Armengol; Daniel Villalba; Laura Vall; Ramon Coma; Josep Roma; Javier Álvarez-Rodríguez
Journal:  Animals (Basel)       Date:  2022-06-24       Impact factor: 3.231

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.