Literature DB >> 33450446

Intelligibility of face-masked speech depends on speaking style: Comparing casual, clear, and emotional speech.

Michelle Cohn1, Anne Pycha2, Georgia Zellou3.   

Abstract

This study investigates the impact of wearing a fabric face mask on speech comprehension, an underexplored topic that can inform theories of speech production. Speakers produced sentences in three speech styles (casual, clear, positive-emotional) while in both face-masked and non-face-masked conditions. Listeners were most accurate at word identification in multi-talker babble for sentences produced in clear speech, and less accurate for casual speech (with emotional speech accuracy numerically in between). In the clear speaking style, face-masked speech was actually more intelligible than non-face-masked speech, suggesting that speakers make clarity adjustments specifically for face masks. In contrast, in the emotional condition, face-masked speech was less intelligible than non-face-masked speech, and in the casual condition, no difference was observed, suggesting that 'emotional' and 'casual' speech are not styles produced with the explicit intent to be intelligible to listeners. These findings are discussed in terms of automatic and targeted speech adaptation accounts.
Copyright © 2020 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Keywords:  Face-masked speech; Models of speech production; Speech-in-noise word comprehension

Mesh:

Year:  2021        PMID: 33450446     DOI: 10.1016/j.cognition.2020.104570

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cognition        ISSN: 0010-0277


  17 in total

1.  The impact of face masks on spectral acoustics of speech: Effect of clear and loud speech styles.

Authors:  Thea Knowles; Gursharan Badh
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2022-05       Impact factor: 2.482

2.  Speech Impaired by Half Masks Used for the Respiratory Tract Protection.

Authors:  Krzysztof Nowacki; Karolina Łakomy; Wojciech Marczak
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2022-06-08       Impact factor: 4.614

3.  Adults With Hearing Loss Demonstrate Resilience During COVID-19 Pandemic: Applications for Postpandemic Services.

Authors:  Katherine Teece; Kristi Oeding; Peggy Nelson
Journal:  Am J Audiol       Date:  2022-05-03       Impact factor: 1.636

4.  Infants recognize words spoken through opaque masks but not through clear masks.

Authors:  Leher Singh; Agnes Tan; Paul C Quinn
Journal:  Dev Sci       Date:  2021-05-03

5.  How great is the negative impact of masking and social distancing and how can we enhance communication skills in the elderly people?

Authors:  Davide Brotto; Flavia Sorrentino; Anna Agostinelli; Elisa Lovo; Silvia Montino; Patrizia Trevisi; Niccolò Favaretto; Roberto Bovo; Alessandro Martini
Journal:  Aging Clin Exp Res       Date:  2021-03-16       Impact factor: 3.636

6.  Impact of SARS-CoV-2 Virus (COVID-19) Preventative Measures on Communication: A Scoping Review.

Authors:  Ilze Oosthuizen; Gabrielle H Saunders; Vinaya Manchaiah; De Wet Swanepoel
Journal:  Front Public Health       Date:  2022-03-28

7.  Acoustic markers of vowels produced with different types of face masks.

Authors:  Georgios P Georgiou
Journal:  Appl Acoust       Date:  2022-03-02       Impact factor: 2.639

8.  Face Masks Do Not Alter Gaze Cueing of Attention: Evidence From the COVID-19 Pandemic.

Authors:  Mario Dalmaso; Xinyuan Zhang; Giovanni Galfano; Luigi Castelli
Journal:  Iperception       Date:  2021-11-30

9.  Face masks and speaking style affect audio-visual word recognition and memory of native and non-native speech.

Authors:  Rajka Smiljanic; Sandie Keerstock; Kirsten Meemann; Sarah M Ransom
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2021-06       Impact factor: 1.840

10.  Face mask type affects audiovisual speech intelligibility and subjective listening effort in young and older adults.

Authors:  Violet A Brown; Kristin J Van Engen; Jonathan E Peelle
Journal:  Cogn Res Princ Implic       Date:  2021-07-18
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.