| Literature DB >> 33450392 |
Megan M Senchuk1, Jeremy M Van Raamsdonk2, Darren J Moore3.
Abstract
Mutations in the leucine-rich repeat kinase 2 (LRRK2) gene are the most frequent cause of late-onset, familial Parkinson's disease (PD), and LRRK2 variants are associated with increased risk for sporadic PD. While advanced age represents the strongest risk factor for disease development, it remains unclear how different age-related pathways interact to regulate LRRK2-driven late-onset PD. In this study, we employ a C. elegans model expressing PD-linked G2019S LRRK2 to examine the interplay between age-related pathways and LRRK2-induced dopaminergic neurodegeneration. We find that multiple genetic pathways that regulate lifespan extension can provide robust neuroprotection against mutant LRRK2. However, the level of neuroprotection does not strictly correlate with the magnitude of lifespan extension, suggesting that lifespan can be experimentally dissociated from neuroprotection. Using tissue-specific RNAi, we demonstrate that lifespan-regulating pathways, including insulin/insulin-like growth factor-1 (IGF-1) signaling, target of rapamycin (TOR), and mitochondrial respiration, can be directly manipulated in neurons to mediate neuroprotection. We extend this finding for AGE-1/PI3K, where pan-neuronal versus dopaminergic neuronal restoration of AGE-1 reveals both cell-autonomous and non-cell-autonomous neuroprotective mechanisms downstream of insulin signaling. Our data demonstrate the importance of distinct lifespan-regulating pathways in the pathogenesis of LRRK2-linked PD, and suggest that extended longevity is broadly neuroprotective via the actions of these pathways at least in part within neurons. This study further highlights the complex interplay that occurs between cells and tissues during organismal aging and disease manifestation.Entities:
Keywords: Insulin; Kinase; LRRK2; Lifespan; Nematode; Neurodegeneration; Neuroprotection; Parkinson's disease; Signaling
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2021 PMID: 33450392 PMCID: PMC7925424 DOI: 10.1016/j.nbd.2021.105267
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Neurobiol Dis ISSN: 0969-9961 Impact factor: 5.996
Fig. 1.Human LRRK2(G2019S) expression in worms induces age-dependent dopaminergic neuronal damage without altering lifespan. A) Dopaminergic neurons are marked by GFP driven by the dopamine transporter (Dat-1) promoter. pDat-1::GFP and pDat-1::GFP; pDat-1::hLRRK2(WT) worms serve as control lines compared to pDat-1-driven transgenic lines expressing common PD-linked LRRK2 mutations (R1441C and G2019S) in addition to pDat-1::GFP. Representative maximum projection confocal micrographs depict dopaminergic neurons on days 6, 9, 12 and 15. In controls strains, GFP intensity is reduced with aging, while LRRK2 mutations (R1441C and G2019S) induce accumulation of GFP-positive puncta associated with increased degeneration. Images are oriented with the mouth to the left. B) C. elegans dopaminergic signaling is carried out by 8 neurons from a total of 302 neurons. Two pairs of cephalic neurons (CEP, blue arrows) are the most anterior, followed by the anterior deirids (ADE, red arrows) located proximal to the nerve ring, and the laterally positioned posterior deirid pair (PDE). The axonal processes of the CEP neurons (red asterisk) extend toward the anterior, while the branched neuritic processes project distally into the synapse-rich nerve ring. The 0–5 scoring metric accounts for the overall morphology and damage of individual CEP dopaminergic cell soma and neurites, the presence and localization of GFP-positive dense puncta (internal versus external to cell body), and overall GFP intensity within individual neurons. C) Graph comparing dopaminergic neuronal damage to CEP neurons in worms expressing GFP alone, LRRK2(WT), or PD-linked LRRK2 mutations (R1441C and G2019S) at days 6, 9, 12 and 15. Data represent dopaminergic damage with scoring from 0 to 5 (mean ± SEM; n = 78–181 CEP neurons/group across 3 independent experiments). LRRK2-expressing transgenics were compared to pDat-1::GFP control worms at each timepoint by one-way ANOVA with Dunnett’s post-test (****P < 0.0001, as indicated). Significant and progressive neuronal damage scores are induced by PD-linked LRRK2 mutations relative to WT LRRK2 or GFP alone. D) Kaplan-Meier survival analysis comparing pDat-1::GFP control (green) and lines expressing pDat-1::GFP together with LRRK2(WT) (black), LRRK2(G2019S) (blue), and LRRK2(R1441C) (red). LRRK2 transgenic lines display a normal lifespan compared to pDat-1::GFP expressed in a wild-type background as indicated by mean longevity (E, mean ± SEM, n = 76–136 animals/group across 3 experiments). One-way ANOVA finds no significant differences between mean lifespan of pDat-1::GFP (cwrIs730, green), pDat-1::LRRK2(WT) (cwrIs722, black), pDat-1::LRRK2(G2019S) (cwrIs856, blue) and pDat-1::LRRK2(R1441C) (cwrIs851, red) worms. Specific N used to generate graphs can be found in Tables S1 (lifespan) and S2 (dopaminergic damage).
Fig. 2.Genetic mutation of negative longevity regulators extends the lifespan of LRRK2(G2019S) transgenic worms. A-H) Kaplan-Meier survival curves comparing longevity of wild-type (N2, black solid) and LRRK2(G2019S) (black dashed) worms with lifespan-extending genetic mutants alone (color solid) and LRRK2(G2019S) transgenics on each mutant background (color dashed). Curves represent combined data from at least 3 individual experiments (n = 96–292 animals). I) Mean lifespan from data shown in A-H. Bars represent mean ± SEM. *P < 0.05 or ****P < 0.0001 compared to WT (N2), ##P < 0.01 or ####P < 0.0001 compared to LRRK2(G2019S), by one-way ANOVA with Bonferroni’s multiple comparisons test. Specific N used to generate graphs can be found in Table S3.
Comparison of lifespan extension induced by genetic mutants in wild-type and LRRK2(G2019S) worms.
| Worm strain | Mean lifespan (days) | Maximum lifespan (days) | Mean lifespan (% of N2 or G2019S) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Wild-type (N2) | 16.43 | 31 | - |
| - | |||
| 39.28 | 60 | 239.07 | |
| 30.81 | 49 | 187.52 | |
| 28.7 | 43 | 174.68 | |
| 27.3 | 34 | 166.16 | |
| 24.65 | 36 | 150.03 | |
| 28.48 | 42 | 173.34 | |
| 23.55 | 35 | 143.34 | |
| 19.42 | 29 | 118.20 | |
For % mean lifespan, single genetic mutants were compared to N2 worms, whereas double mutants were compared to LRRK2(G2019S) (in bold).
Fig. 3.Lifespan extension is broadly neuroprotective in the LRRK2(G2019S) worm model. A) Representative maximum projection confocal images of anterior GFP-positive CEP dopaminergic neurons at day 14 of adulthood from LRRK2(G2019S) on a wild-type or genetic mutant background. Images reveal reduced yet variable neuronal damage in all lifespan-extending backgrounds. B) Quantification of CEP dopaminergic neuronal damage at day 14 using the 0–5 scoring metric. Bars represent the mean ± SEM damage from ≥3 individual experiments (n = 171–2181 CEP neurons/group). *P < 0.05, **P < 0.005 or ****P < 0.0001 compared to LRRK2(G2019S) alone by one-way ANOVA with Dunnett’s post-hoc test. C) Linear regression analysis (R2 = 0.4266) of mean lifespan (in days) relative to mean dopaminergic neuronal damage (0–5 score) for each worm strain, reveals a general inverse correlation indicating that lifespan extension is broadly associated with reduced neuronal damage. Specific N used to generate graphs can be found in Table S3.
Fig. 4.Lifespan extension and neuroprotection mediated by age-1 mutant in LRRK2(G2019S) worms is dependent on DAF-16. Kaplan-Meier survival curve (A) and mean lifespan (B) of LRRK2(G2019S) worms on a wild-type background, and on an age-1 or age-1; daf-16 genetic background. The daf-16 mutant fully reverses the extended lifespan conferred by age-1. A) Curves represent combined survival data from at least 3 individual experiments (n = 59–87 animals/group), whereas B) bars represent mean ± SEM lifespan. C) Quantitation of CEP dopaminergic neuronal damage at day 14 in LRRK2(G2019S) worms on all three genetic backgrounds. An age-1 mutant markedly reduces neuronal damage compared to the wild-type background, that is fully restored to normal wild-type levels in an age-1; daf-16 double mutant. Bars represent the mean ± SEM neuronal damage (n = 183–413 CEP neurons/group across 3 independent experiments). ****P < 0.0001 compared to LRRK2 (G2019S) alone by one-way ANOVA with Dunnett’s post-hoc analysis. Specific N used to generate graphs can be found in Table S4.
Fig. 5.Genetic mutation of positive longevity regulators reduces the lifespan of LRRK2(G2019S) worms and enhances neurodegeneration. Kaplan-Meier survival curve (A) and mean lifespan (B) comparing LRRK2(G2019S) on a wild-type background (black dashed) to lifespan-reducing genetic mutants alone (color solid) and LRRK2(G2019S) transgenics on each mutant background (color dashed). Curves/bars represent combined survival data from at least 3 individual experiments (n = 61–187 animals/group). Mutation of either daf-16/FOXO (red) or aak-2/AMPK (blue) significantly reduces the mean lifespan of LRRK2(G2019S) worms, as indicated by one-way ANOVA with Dunnett’s post-hoc test (****P < 0.0001). LRRK2(G2019S)-expressing worms induce a modest increase in the lifespan of daf-16 or aak-2 mutants relative to each mutant alone, yet to a lesser extent than the lifespan of LRRK2(G2019S) alone (###P < 0.005 or ####P < 0.0005 by two-tailed, unpaired Student’s t-test, as indicated). As depicted in (C) and quantified in (D), the onset of LRRK2(G2019S)-induced neurodegeneration occurs by an earlier timepoint (day 9–12) and with significantly increased damage scores in lifespan-reducing mutant backgrounds. ***P < 0.0005 or ****P < 0.0001 by one-way ANOVA with Dunnett’s post-hoc test compared to LRRK2(G2019S) alone at each time point. Bars represent the mean ± SEM neuronal damage (n = 39–151 CEP neurons/group across 3 independent experiments). Specific N used to generate graphs can be found in Tables S5 (lifespan) and S6 (dopaminergic damage).
Fig. 6.Neuronal-specific knockdown of multiple longevity-regulating genes is neuroprotective in the LRRK2(G2019S) worm model. A subset of negative regulators of longevity were targeted by RNAi-mediated knockdown either systemically (body-wide, with reduced efficacy in neurons) (A, C) or specifically within the neuronal cell population using the pUnc-119::SID-1; sid-1(pk3321) background (B, D). Mean lifespan of each strain is indicated (A–B). Bars represent the mean ± SEM combined from ≥3 independent experiments with n = 111–278 animals per group. Quantitation of CEP dopaminergic neuronal damage in LRRK2(G2019S) worms with C) systemic body-wide RNAi assessed at day 14, or D) neuronal-specific RNAi assessed at day 11. Note: systemic knockdown of nuo-6 results in early lethality and cannot be assessed in (A, C). Bars represent the mean ± SEM combined from ≥3 independent experiments with n = 221–764 CEP neurons/group. *P < 0.05, **P < 0.01, ***P < 0.001 or ****P < 0.0001 compared to control (empty vector, EV) by one-way ANOVA with Dunnett’s post-hoc test. Specific N used to generate graphs can be found in Table S7.
Comparison of fold change in lifespan and dopaminergic neuronal damage with systemic or neuronal-specific RNAi knockdown of longevity-regulating genes.
| Lifespan (fold change versus EV) | Dopaminergic damage (fold change versus EV) | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| RNAi | Systemic | Neuronal | Systemic | Neuronal |
| 1.23 | 1.16 | 0.88 | 0.9 | |
| 1.35 | 1.46 | 0.78 | 0.83 | |
| 1.19 | 1.08 | 0.87 | 0.89 | |
| 1.2 | 1.2 | 0.95 | 1.02 | |
| n/a | 1.01 | n/a | 0.73 | |
Fig. 7.Restoring AGE-1/PI3K function in dopaminergic neurons demonstrates a cell-autonomous effect on LRRK2(G2019S)-induced neuronal damage. A) Kaplan-Meier survival curves comparing the lifespan of LRRK2(G2019S) (black), age-1; LRRK2(G2019S) (blue), and transgenic lines expressing AGE-1 from pan-neuronal (pUnc-119; green) or dopaminergic-specific (pDat-1; red) promoters in the age-1; LRRK2(G2019S) background. B) Mean lifespan of each worm strain from survival data shown (A). Bars represent the mean ± SEM from ≥3 independent experiments with n = 74–111 animals per group. Extended lifespan in the age-1 background is partially reverted by pan-neuronal AGE-1 expression. C) Quantification of mean dopaminergic neuronal damage induced by LRRK2(G2019S) at day 14 in wild-type, age-1 mutant, or in tissue-specific AGE-1 rescue lines on an age-1 mutant background. Bars represent the mean ± SEM from ≥3 independent experiments with n = 183–413 CEP neurons/group. ****P < 0.0001 between the indicated groups by one-way ANOVA with Dunnett’s multiple comparisons post-hoc test. D) Representative maximum projection confocal images of GFP-positive CEP dopaminergic neurons at day 14 in pDat-1::GFP; pDat-1::LRRK2(G2019S) worms on wild-type, age-1 or transgenic AGE-1 rescue backgrounds. Specific N used to generate graphs can be found in Table S8.
| Strain | Genotype | Original publication |
|---|---|---|
| DJM003 | cwrIs856 [Pdat-1::GFP, Pdat-1::LRRK2 (G2019S), lin-15(+)] | ( |
| SGC851 | cwrIs851 [Pdat-1::GFP, (Pdat-1::LRRK2 (R1441C), lin-15(+)] | ( |
| SGC730 | cwrIs730 [Pdat-1::GFP, lin-15(+)] | ( |
| SGC722 | cwrIs722 [Pdat-1::GFP, Pdat-1::LRRK2 (WT), lin-15(+)] | ( |
| CB1370 | daf-2(e1370) III | ( |
| TJ1052 | age-1(hx546) II | ( |
| MQ1333 | nuo-6(qm200) I | ( |
| CB4037 | glp-1(e2141) III | ( |
| DA1116 | eat-2(ad1116) II | ( |
| KX15 | ife-2(ok306) X | ( |
| VC265 | osm-5(ok451) X | ( |
| RB1206 | rsks-1(ok1255) III | ( |
| JVR202 | daf-2(e1370) III; cwrIs856 [Pdat-1::GFP, Pdat-1::LRRK2(G2019S), lin-15(+)] | ( |
| DJM050 | age-1(hx546) II; cwrIs856 [Pdat-1::GFP, Pdat-1::LRRK2(G2019S), lin-15(+)] | |
| JVR321 | nuo-6(qm200); cwrIs856 [Pdat-1::GFP, Pdat-1::LRRK2(G2019S), lin-15(+)]) | |
| DJM049 | glp-1(e2141); cwrIs856 [Pdat-1::GFP, Pdat-1::LRRK2(G2019S), lin-15(+)] | |
| JVR320 | eat-2(ad1116) II.; cwrIs856 [Pdat-1::GFP, Pdat-1::LRRK2(G2019S), lin-15(+)]) | |
| JVR315 | ife-2(ok306) X.; cwrIs856 [Pdat-1::GFP, Pdat-1::LRRK2(G2019S), lin-15(+)]) | |
| DJM048 | osm-5(ok451); cwrIs856 [Pdat-1::GFP, Pdat-1::LRRK2(G2019S), lin-15(+)] | |
| DJM068 | rsks-1(ok1255) III; cwrIs856 [Pdat-1:: GFP, Pdat-1::LRRK2(G2019S), lin-15(+)] | |
| DJM067 | daf-16(mu86) I; age-1(hx546) II; cwrIs856 [Pdat-1::GFP, Pdat-1::LRRK2 (G2019S), lin-15(+)] | |
| DJM063 | age-1(hx546) II; cwrIs856 [Pdat-1::GFP, Pdat-1::LRRK2(G2019S), lin-15(+)] ; wpdEx7 (pUnc-119::AGE1Orf::letutr + pMyo-3::RFP) | |
| DJM064 | age-1(hx546) II; cwrIs856 [Pdat-1::GFP, Pdat-1::LRRK2(G2019S), lin-15(+)]; wpdEx8 (pUnc-119::AGE1Orf::letutr + pMyo-3::RFP) | |
| DJM065 | age-1(hx546) II; cwrIs856 [Pdat-1::GFP, Pdat-1::LRRK2(G2019S), lin-15(+)]; wpdEx9 (pDat-1::AGE1Orf::let858 + pMyo-3::RFP) | |
| DJM066 | age-1(hx546) II; cwrIs856 [Pdat-1::GFP, Pdat-1::LRRK2(G2019S), lin-15(+)]; wpdEx10 (pDat-1::AGE1Orf::let858 + pMyo-3::RFP) | |
| TU3401 | sid-1(pk3321) V; uIs69[pCFJ90(myo-2p:: mCherry) + unc-119p::sid-1] V | ( |
| DJM001 | [Pdat-1::GFP, lin-15(+)]; sid-1(pk3321) V; uIs69[pCFJ90(myo-2p::mCherry) + unc-119p::sid-1] V | |
| DJM002 | [Pdat-1::GFP, Pdat-1::LRRK2(G2019S), lin-15(+)]; sid-1(pk3321) V; uIs69 [pCFJ90(myo-2p::mCherry) + unc-119p:: sid-1] V |