Literature DB >> 33450236

The potential co-benefits for health, economy and climate by substituting raw coal with waste cooking oil as a winter heating fuel in rural households of northern China.

Nan Zhao1, Bowen Li1, Huan Li1, Gang Li2, Rucong Wu1, Quan Hong1, Philbert Mperejekumana1, Shan Liu3, Yuguang Zhou1, Riaz Ahmad4, Ali Mohammed Ibrahim Zayan5, Crispin Pemberton-Pigott6, Renjie Dong7.   

Abstract

The toxic emissions from coal combustion associated with domestic winter heating requirements are an important public health issue. Waste cooking oil (WCO) holds promise as a means of reducing pollutant emissions thereby improving human health with the co-benefit of decreasing climate-forcing gas emissions by avoiding the combustion of mineral coal. With an annual production of ~2.17 Mt of WCO in Northern China, it could be used to meet the winter heating demand of ~3.25 million rural households, offsetting ~9.83 Mt of raw coal consumption. Through the adoption of coal-to-WCO shift in rural regions of 15 provinces, approximately 15.0%, 15.6%, 15.9% and 13.7%, respectively of CO, PM2.5, SO2 and NOX emissions would be eliminated. It is estimated that such a change would remove the respective contributions of these pollutants to the premature deaths of respectively, 63,400, 29,300, 173,00 and 31,300 rural residents. Such a positive health impact on the labor cohort would reduce the loss of labor supply and work time, as well as producing billions of RMB in economic benefits. WCO-based heating technology has the same effect on the reduction of GWC100 value as other modern energy carriers while also being cheaper and sustainable, long term. Reducing household emissions by substituting raw coal with green energy is a vital strategy to support pathways for sustainable environment design. The results of this work for the coal-to-WCO shift can reinforce the support for coal phase-out in China.
Copyright © 2020 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Clean heating; Green combustion; Household emission; Waste cooking oil; Waste recycle

Year:  2021        PMID: 33450236     DOI: 10.1016/j.envres.2020.110683

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Environ Res        ISSN: 0013-9351            Impact factor:   6.498


  2 in total

1.  Comparative evaluation of thermal and emission performances for improved commercial coal-fired stoves in China.

Authors:  Riaz Ahmad; Yuguang Zhou; Chao Liang; Gang Li; Nan Zhao; Adnan Abbas; Fan Yu; Lianliang Li; Jue Gong; Duoyi Wang; Yanming Yang; Zixuan Tang; Muhammad Sultan; Chao Sun; Renjie Dong
Journal:  RSC Adv       Date:  2022-07-20       Impact factor: 4.036

2.  Determinants of Solid Fuel Use and Emission Risks among Households: Insights from Limpopo, South Africa.

Authors:  Rebecca O Adeeyo; Joshua N Edokpayi; Tom E Volenzo; John O Odiyo; Stuart J Piketh
Journal:  Toxics       Date:  2022-02-04
  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.