Literature DB >> 33449973

Survey-derived best management practices for backyard beekeepers improve colony health and reduce mortality.

Kelly Kulhanek1, Nathalie Steinhauer1, James Wilkes2, Michaela Wilson3, Marla Spivak4, Ramesh R Sagili5, David R Tarpy6, Erin McDermott6, Andrew Garavito1, Karen Rennich1, Dennis vanEngelsdorp1.   

Abstract

Honey bee colony losses in the US have exceeded acceptable levels for at least a decade, leaving beekeepers in need of management practices to improve colony health and survival. Here, an empirical Best Management Practice (BMP) regimen was tested, comprised of the top four management practices associated with reduced colony mortality in backyard beekeeping operations according to Bee Informed Partnership Loss and Management survey results. Seven study locations were established across the US, and each location consisted of ten colonies treated according to empirical BMPs and ten according to average beekeeping practice. After 3 years, colonies treated according to empirical BMPs experienced reduced Varroa infestation, viral infection, and mortality compared to colonies managed with Average practices. In addition, BMP colonies produced more new colonies via splits. The colonies under Average practices were given chemical Varroa treatments only once per year, and thus spent more months above economic threshold of 3.0 mites/100 bees. Increased time spent above the economic threshold was significantly correlated to both increased viral infection and colony mortality. This study demonstrates the cumulative effects of management and colony health stressors over months and years, especially the dire importance of regular Varroa monitoring and management.

Entities:  

Year:  2021        PMID: 33449973      PMCID: PMC7810333          DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0245490

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  PLoS One        ISSN: 1932-6203            Impact factor:   3.240


  29 in total

Review 1.  Bee declines driven by combined stress from parasites, pesticides, and lack of flowers.

Authors:  Dave Goulson; Elizabeth Nicholls; Cristina Botías; Ellen L Rotheray
Journal:  Science       Date:  2015-02-26       Impact factor: 47.728

2.  Neonicotinoid pesticides and nutritional stress synergistically reduce survival in honey bees.

Authors:  Simone Tosi; James C Nieh; Fabio Sgolastra; Riccardo Cabbri; Piotr Medrzycki
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2017-12-20       Impact factor: 5.349

Review 3.  Drivers of colony losses.

Authors:  Nathalie Steinhauer; Kelly Kulhanek; Karina Antúnez; Hannelie Human; Panuwan Chantawannakul; Marie-Pierre Chauzat; Dennis vanEngelsdorp
Journal:  Curr Opin Insect Sci       Date:  2018-02-08       Impact factor: 5.186

4.  The global stock of domesticated honey bees is growing slower than agricultural demand for pollination.

Authors:  Marcelo A Aizen; Lawrence D Harder
Journal:  Curr Biol       Date:  2009-05-07       Impact factor: 10.834

5.  Pesticide residues and bees--a risk assessment.

Authors:  Francisco Sanchez-Bayo; Koichi Goka
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-04-09       Impact factor: 3.240

6.  Specific Cues Associated With Honey Bee Social Defence against Varroa destructor Infested Brood.

Authors:  Fanny Mondet; Seo Hyun Kim; Joachim R de Miranda; Dominique Beslay; Yves Le Conte; Alison R Mercer
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2016-05-03       Impact factor: 4.379

7.  Linking Measures of Colony and Individual Honey Bee Health to Survival among Apiaries Exposed to Varying Agricultural Land Use.

Authors:  Matthew Smart; Jeff Pettis; Nathan Rice; Zac Browning; Marla Spivak
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2016-03-30       Impact factor: 3.240

8.  Honey Bee Survival and Pathogen Prevalence: From the Perspective of Landscape and Exposure to Pesticides.

Authors:  Mohamed Alburaki; Deniz Chen; John A Skinner; William G Meikle; David R Tarpy; John Adamczyk; Scott D Stewart
Journal:  Insects       Date:  2018-06-13       Impact factor: 2.769

9.  Varroa destructor feeds primarily on honey bee fat body tissue and not hemolymph.

Authors:  Samuel D Ramsey; Ronald Ochoa; Gary Bauchan; Connor Gulbronson; Joseph D Mowery; Allen Cohen; David Lim; Judith Joklik; Joseph M Cicero; James D Ellis; David Hawthorne; Dennis vanEngelsdorp
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2019-01-15       Impact factor: 11.205

View more
  5 in total

1.  Pupal cannibalism by worker honey bees contributes to the spread of deformed wing virus.

Authors:  Francisco Posada-Florez; Zachary S Lamas; David J Hawthorne; Yanping Chen; Jay D Evans; Eugene V Ryabov
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2021-04-26       Impact factor: 4.996

2.  An Insight Into the microRNA Profile of the Ectoparasitic Mite Varroa destructor (Acari: Varroidae), the Primary Vector of Honey Bee Deformed Wing Virus.

Authors:  Deepak Kumar; Mohamed Alburaki; Faizan Tahir; Michael Goblirsch; John Adamczyk; Shahid Karim
Journal:  Front Cell Infect Microbiol       Date:  2022-03-16       Impact factor: 5.293

3.  Frontiers in effective control of problem parasites in beekeeping.

Authors:  Lewis J Bartlett
Journal:  Int J Parasitol Parasites Wildl       Date:  2022-03-10       Impact factor: 2.674

4.  Varroa Appears to Drive Persistent Increases in New Zealand Colony Losses.

Authors:  Philip Stahlmann-Brown; Richard J Hall; Hayley Pragert; Thomas Robertson
Journal:  Insects       Date:  2022-06-28       Impact factor: 3.139

5.  Bee Health and Productivity in Apis mellifera, a Consequence of Multiple Factors.

Authors:  Verónica Rachel Olate-Olave; Mayda Verde; Leslie Vallejos; Leonel Perez Raymonda; Maria Carla Cortese; Marnix Doorn
Journal:  Vet Sci       Date:  2021-05-04
  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.