Sujata Sharma1, David Quinn1, J Joseph Melenhorst2, Iulian Pruteanu-Malinici3,4. 1. Novartis Institutes for Biomedical Research, Cambridge, MA, USA. 2. Center for Cellular Immunotherapies, Perelman School of Medicine at the University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, 19104, USA. 3. Novartis Institutes for Biomedical Research, Cambridge, MA, USA. iulian.pruteanu@novartis.com. 4. Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Perelman School of Medicine at the University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, 19104, USA. iulian.pruteanu@novartis.com.
Abstract
PURPOSE OF REVIEW: High-dimensional flow cytometry experiments have become a method of choice for high-throughput integration and characterization of cell populations. Here, we present a summary of state-of-the-art R-based pipelines used for differential analyses of cytometry data, largely based on chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T cell therapies. These pipelines are based on publicly available R libraries, put together in a systematic and functional fashion, therefore free of cost. RECENT FINDINGS: In recent years, existing tools tailored to analyze complex high-dimensional data such as single-cell RNA sequencing (scRNAseq) have been successfully ported to cytometry studies due to the similar nature of flow cytometry and scRNAseq platforms. Existing environments like Cytobank (Kotecha et al., 2010), FlowJo (FlowJo™ Software) and FCS Express (https://denovosoftware.com) already offer a variety of these ported tools, but they either come at a premium or are fairly complicated to manage by an inexperienced user. To mitigate these limitations, experienced cytometrists and bioinformaticians usually incorporate these functions into an RShiny (https://shiny.rstudio.com) application that ultimately offers a user-friendly, intuitive environment that can be used to analyze flow cytometry data. Computational tools and Shiny-based tools are the perfect answer to the ever-growing dimensionality and complexity of flow cytometry data, by offering a dynamic, yet user-friendly exploratory space, tailored to bridge the space between the lab experimental world and the computational, machine learning space.
PURPOSE OF REVIEW: High-dimensional flow cytometry experiments have become a method of choice for high-throughput integration and characterization of cell populations. Here, we present a summary of state-of-the-art R-based pipelines used for differential analyses of cytometry data, largely based on chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T cell therapies. These pipelines are based on publicly available R libraries, put together in a systematic and functional fashion, therefore free of cost. RECENT FINDINGS: In recent years, existing tools tailored to analyze complex high-dimensional data such as single-cell RNA sequencing (scRNAseq) have been successfully ported to cytometry studies due to the similar nature of flow cytometry and scRNAseq platforms. Existing environments like Cytobank (Kotecha et al., 2010), FlowJo (FlowJo™ Software) and FCS Express (https://denovosoftware.com) already offer a variety of these ported tools, but they either come at a premium or are fairly complicated to manage by an inexperienced user. To mitigate these limitations, experienced cytometrists and bioinformaticians usually incorporate these functions into an RShiny (https://shiny.rstudio.com) application that ultimately offers a user-friendly, intuitive environment that can be used to analyze flow cytometry data. Computational tools and Shiny-based tools are the perfect answer to the ever-growing dimensionality and complexity of flow cytometry data, by offering a dynamic, yet user-friendly exploratory space, tailored to bridge the space between the lab experimental world and the computational, machine learning space.
Authors: Rebecca Gardner; David Wu; Sindhu Cherian; Min Fang; Laïla-Aïcha Hanafi; Olivia Finney; Hannah Smithers; Michael C Jensen; Stanley R Riddell; David G Maloney; Cameron J Turtle Journal: Blood Date: 2016-02-23 Impact factor: 22.113
Authors: Frederick L Locke; Armin Ghobadi; Caron A Jacobson; David B Miklos; Lazaros J Lekakis; Olalekan O Oluwole; Yi Lin; Ira Braunschweig; Brian T Hill; John M Timmerman; Abhinav Deol; Patrick M Reagan; Patrick Stiff; Ian W Flinn; Umar Farooq; Andre Goy; Peter A McSweeney; Javier Munoz; Tanya Siddiqi; Julio C Chavez; Alex F Herrera; Nancy L Bartlett; Jeffrey S Wiezorek; Lynn Navale; Allen Xue; Yizhou Jiang; Adrian Bot; John M Rossi; Jenny J Kim; William Y Go; Sattva S Neelapu Journal: Lancet Oncol Date: 2018-12-02 Impact factor: 41.316
Authors: Elena Sotillo; David M Barrett; Kathryn L Black; Asen Bagashev; Derek Oldridge; Glendon Wu; Robyn Sussman; Claudia Lanauze; Marco Ruella; Matthew R Gazzara; Nicole M Martinez; Colleen T Harrington; Elaine Y Chung; Jessica Perazzelli; Ted J Hofmann; Shannon L Maude; Pichai Raman; Alejandro Barrera; Saar Gill; Simon F Lacey; Jan J Melenhorst; David Allman; Elad Jacoby; Terry Fry; Crystal Mackall; Yoseph Barash; Kristen W Lynch; John M Maris; Stephan A Grupp; Andrei Thomas-Tikhonenko Journal: Cancer Discov Date: 2015-10-29 Impact factor: 39.397
Authors: Shannon L Maude; Noelle Frey; Pamela A Shaw; Richard Aplenc; David M Barrett; Nancy J Bunin; Anne Chew; Vanessa E Gonzalez; Zhaohui Zheng; Simon F Lacey; Yolanda D Mahnke; Jan J Melenhorst; Susan R Rheingold; Angela Shen; David T Teachey; Bruce L Levine; Carl H June; David L Porter; Stephan A Grupp Journal: N Engl J Med Date: 2014-10-16 Impact factor: 91.245
Authors: Sattva S Neelapu; Frederick L Locke; Nancy L Bartlett; Lazaros J Lekakis; David B Miklos; Caron A Jacobson; Ira Braunschweig; Olalekan O Oluwole; Tanya Siddiqi; Yi Lin; John M Timmerman; Patrick J Stiff; Jonathan W Friedberg; Ian W Flinn; Andre Goy; Brian T Hill; Mitchell R Smith; Abhinav Deol; Umar Farooq; Peter McSweeney; Javier Munoz; Irit Avivi; Januario E Castro; Jason R Westin; Julio C Chavez; Armin Ghobadi; Krishna V Komanduri; Ronald Levy; Eric D Jacobsen; Thomas E Witzig; Patrick Reagan; Adrian Bot; John Rossi; Lynn Navale; Yizhou Jiang; Jeff Aycock; Meg Elias; David Chang; Jeff Wiezorek; William Y Go Journal: N Engl J Med Date: 2017-12-10 Impact factor: 91.245
Authors: Stephen J Schuster; Jakub Svoboda; Elise A Chong; Sunita D Nasta; Anthony R Mato; Özlem Anak; Jennifer L Brogdon; Iulian Pruteanu-Malinici; Vijay Bhoj; Daniel Landsburg; Mariusz Wasik; Bruce L Levine; Simon F Lacey; Jan J Melenhorst; David L Porter; Carl H June Journal: N Engl J Med Date: 2017-12-10 Impact factor: 91.245
Authors: Olivia C Finney; Hannah M Brakke; Stephanie Rawlings-Rhea; Roxana Hicks; Danielle Doolittle; Marisa Lopez; Robert B Futrell; Rimas J Orentas; Daniel Li; Rebecca A Gardner; Michael C Jensen Journal: J Clin Invest Date: 2019-03-12 Impact factor: 14.808
Authors: David L Porter; Wei-Ting Hwang; Noelle V Frey; Simon F Lacey; Pamela A Shaw; Alison W Loren; Adam Bagg; Katherine T Marcucci; Angela Shen; Vanessa Gonzalez; David Ambrose; Stephan A Grupp; Anne Chew; Zhaohui Zheng; Michael C Milone; Bruce L Levine; Jan J Melenhorst; Carl H June Journal: Sci Transl Med Date: 2015-09-02 Impact factor: 17.956
Authors: Nathan Singh; Elena Orlando; Jun Xu; Jie Xu; Zev Binder; McKensie A Collins; Donald M O'Rourke; J Joseph Melenhorst Journal: Semin Cancer Biol Date: 2019-12-19 Impact factor: 15.707
Authors: Luca Gattinoni; Enrico Lugli; Yun Ji; Zoltan Pos; Chrystal M Paulos; Máire F Quigley; Jorge R Almeida; Emma Gostick; Zhiya Yu; Carmine Carpenito; Ena Wang; Daniel C Douek; David A Price; Carl H June; Francesco M Marincola; Mario Roederer; Nicholas P Restifo Journal: Nat Med Date: 2011-09-18 Impact factor: 53.440