Literature DB >> 33448874

Patient-related barriers to some virtual healthcare services among cancer patients in the USA: a population-based study.

Omar Abdel-Rahman1.   

Abstract

Objective: To assess the patient-related barriers to access of some virtual healthcare tools among cancer patients in the USA in a population-based cohort. Materials & methods: National Health Interview Survey datasets (2011-2018) were reviewed and adult participants (≥18 years old) with a history of cancer diagnosis and complete information about virtual healthcare utilization (defined by [a] filling a prescription on the internet in the past 12 months and/or [b] communicating with a healthcare provider through email in the past 12 months) were included. Information about video-conferenced phone calls and telephone calls are not available in the National Health Interview Survey datasets; and thus, they were not examined in this study. Multivariable logistic regression analysis was used to evaluate factors associated with the utilization of virtual care tools.
Results: A total of 25,121 participants were included in the current analysis; including 4499 participants (17.9%) who utilized virtual care in the past 12 months and 20,622 participants (82.1%) who did not utilize virtual care in the past 12 months. The following factors were associated with less utilization of virtual healthcare tools in multivariable logistic regression: older age (continuous odds ratio [OR] with increasing age: 0.987; 95% CI: 0.984-0.990), African-American race (OR for African American vs white race: 0.608; 95% CI: 0.517-0.715), unmarried status (OR for unmarried compared with married status: 0.689; 95% CI: 0.642-0.739), lower level of education (OR for education ≤high school vs >high school: 0.284; 95% CI: 0.259-0.311), weaker English proficiency (OR for no proficiency vs very good proficiency: 0.224; 95% CI: 0.091-0.552) and lower yearly earnings (OR for earnings <$45,000 vs earnings >$45,000: 0.582; 95% CI: 0.523-0.647).
Conclusion: Older patients, those with African-American race, lower education, lower earnings and weak English proficiency are less likely to access the above studied virtual healthcare tools. Further efforts are needed to tackle disparities in telemedicine access.

Entities:  

Keywords:  cancer; healthcare access; telemedicine; virtual care

Mesh:

Year:  2021        PMID: 33448874     DOI: 10.2217/cer-2020-0187

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Comp Eff Res        ISSN: 2042-6305            Impact factor:   1.744


  8 in total

1.  Future of Teleoncology: Trends and Disparities in Telehealth and Secure Message Utilization in the COVID-19 Era.

Authors:  Elad Neeman; Liisa Lyon; Hongxin Sun; Carol Conell; Mary Reed; Deepika Kumar; Tatjana Kolevska; Dinesh Kotak; Tilak Sundaresan; Raymond Liu
Journal:  JCO Clin Cancer Inform       Date:  2022-03

2.  Lessons learned: Telemedicine patterns and clinical application in patients with gynecologic cancers during COVID-19.

Authors:  Sarah A Ackroyd; Melinique Walls; Josephine S Kim; Nita K Lee
Journal:  Gynecol Oncol Rep       Date:  2022-04-27

3.  Impact of COVID-19 on Cervical Cancer Screening Rates Among Women Aged 21-65 Years in a Large Integrated Health Care System - Southern California, January 1-September 30, 2019, and January 1-September 30, 2020.

Authors:  Maureen J Miller; Lanfang Xu; Jin Qin; Erin E Hahn; Quyen Ngo-Metzger; Brian Mittman; Devansu Tewari; Melissa Hodeib; Patricia Wride; Mona Saraiya; Chun R Chao
Journal:  MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep       Date:  2021-01-29       Impact factor: 17.586

Review 4.  The Use of Virtual Care in Patients with Hematologic Malignancies: A Scoping Review.

Authors:  Adam Suleman; Abi Vijenthira; Alejandro Berlin; Anca Prica; Danielle Rodin
Journal:  Curr Oncol       Date:  2022-02-07       Impact factor: 3.677

5.  HIV care using differentiated service delivery during the COVID-19 pandemic: a nationwide cohort study in the US Department of Veterans Affairs.

Authors:  Kathleen A McGinnis; Melissa Skanderson; Amy C Justice; Kathleen M Akgün; Janet P Tate; Joseph T King; Christopher T Rentsch; Vincent C Marconi; Evelyn Hsieh; Christopher Ruser; Farah Kidwai-Khan; Roozbeh Yousefzadeh; Joseph Erdos; Lesley S Park
Journal:  J Int AIDS Soc       Date:  2021-10       Impact factor: 5.396

6.  Evaluating Racial/Ethnic Differences in Care Escalation Among COVID-19 Patients in a Home-Based Hospital.

Authors:  Tsai-Ling Liu; Shih-Hsiung Chou; Stephanie Murphy; Marc Kowalkowski; Yhenneko J Taylor; Colleen Hole; Kranthi Sitammagari; Jennifer S Priem; Andrew McWilliams
Journal:  J Racial Ethn Health Disparities       Date:  2022-03-07

Review 7.  Exercise oncology during and beyond the COVID-19 pandemic: Are virtually supervised exercise interventions a sustainable alternative?

Authors:  Paola Gonzalo-Encabo; Rebekah L Wilson; Dong-Woo Kang; Amber J Normann; Christina M Dieli-Conwright
Journal:  Crit Rev Oncol Hematol       Date:  2022-05-05       Impact factor: 6.625

8.  Digital Literacy at an Urban Cancer Center: Implications for Technology Use and Vulnerable Patients.

Authors:  Amy E Leader; Lisa M Capparella; Lauren B Waldman; Rebecca B Cammy; Alison R Petok; Rebecca Dean; Ayako Shimada; Liana Yocavitch; Kristin L Rising; Gregory D Garber; Brooke Worster; Adam P Dicker
Journal:  JCO Clin Cancer Inform       Date:  2021-08
  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.