Literature DB >> 33448471

The current status of ultrasound education in United States medical schools.

Elizabeth Nicholas1, Alan A Ly, Anna M Prince, Paul F Klawitter, Kevin Gaskin, Louise A Prince.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: Ultrasound is used by nearly every medical specialty. Medical schools are integrating ultrasound education into their curriculum but studies show this to be inconsistent. The purpose of this study was to provide an updated description of ultrasound in the curricula of United States Accredited Medical Schools (USAMS).
METHODS: In 2019, USAMS curricular offices were contacted. Institutions were asked about the presence of ultrasound curriculum and for contact information for faculty involved with education. Schools reporting ultrasound curriculum were surveyed regarding details of their curriculum.
RESULTS: Two hundred USAMS were contacted with a response rate of 84%. Of 168 schools, 72.6% indicated they have an ultrasound curriculum. For schools with a curriculum, 79 (64.8%) completed our survey. The majority of survey respondents, 66 (83.5%), indicated having mandatory ultrasound. Ultrasound is primarily integrated into courses (73.8% in basic science courses, 66.2% in clinical skills courses, and 35.4% in clinical rotations). Emergency medicine physicians accounted for 54.7% of course directors. Ten or fewer faculty participate in education in 68.4% of schools and mostly as volunteers. Dedicated machines for education were reported by 78.5% of schools.
CONCLUSIONS: Compared to prior studies, this study had a higher response rate at 84%, and more schools reported ultrasound in their curricula. Emergency medicine represents the majority of leadership in ultrasound education. Despite increased integration of ultrasound into American medical school curricula, its instruction is still inconsistent.
© 2021 American Institute of Ultrasound in Medicine.

Keywords:  curricula; medical education; point-of-care; ultrasound

Year:  2021        PMID: 33448471     DOI: 10.1002/jum.15633

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Ultrasound Med        ISSN: 0278-4297            Impact factor:   2.153


  6 in total

1.  A comparison of handheld and standard ultrasound in Swiss medical students.

Authors:  Mark Slader; Hayley Young; Margot Barker; Kylie Prentice; Katherine Bogaard; Charlene Yuan; Soheil Saadat; Shadi Lahham
Journal:  World J Emerg Med       Date:  2022

Review 2.  Ultrasonography in undergraduate medical education: a comprehensive review and the education program implemented at Jichi Medical University.

Authors:  Toru Kameda; Nobuyuki Taniguchi; Kei Konno; Harumi Koibuchi; Kiyoka Omoto; Kouichi Itoh
Journal:  J Med Ultrason (2001)       Date:  2022-01-16       Impact factor: 1.878

3.  Creating an Ultrasound Scholarly Concentration Program for Medical Students.

Authors:  Daniel R Bacon; Keri Cowles; Diwash Thapa; Alexander White; Austin J Allen; John Doughton; Gary Beck Dallaghan; Sheryl G Jordan
Journal:  Adv Med Educ Pract       Date:  2021-09-24

4.  Advancing Point-of-Care Ultrasound Training in Medical Schools: Ultrasound-Guided Subclavian Vein Access Training Using Formalin-Embalmed Cadavers.

Authors:  Bosten A Loveless; Maxton W Muir; Abigail L Limov; Alexa R Fritsch; Rebecca J Thomas; Taylor J Yancey; Chad J Skidmore; Isain Zapata; Andrew D Nigh; Nena Lundgreen Mason
Journal:  Crit Care Explor       Date:  2022-04-25

5.  Motivations, barriers, and professional engagement: a multisite qualitative study of internal medicine faculty's experiences learning and teaching point-of-care ultrasound.

Authors:  Christopher J Smith; Keith Barron; Ronald J Shope; Elizabeth Beam; Kevin Piro
Journal:  BMC Med Educ       Date:  2022-03-12       Impact factor: 2.463

6.  Adaptation of an anatomy graduate course in ultrasound imaging from in-person to live, remote instruction during the Covid-19 pandemic.

Authors:  Robert M DePhilip; Melissa M Quinn
Journal:  Anat Sci Educ       Date:  2022-04-05       Impact factor: 6.652

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.