Literature DB >> 33448203

[Double internal fixations of clavicle and scapula and intraoperative reduction of glenopolar angle for treatment of floating shoulder injuries].

Jianqiang Xue1, Hanwen Zhang1, Le Jia1, Xin Hu1, Xiaobo Lu2, Jianhua Ge2.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To investigate the effectiveness of double internal fixations of clavicle and scapula and intraoperative reduction of glenopolar angle in the treatment of floating shoulder injuries.
METHODS: Between January 2010 and June 2019, 13 patients with floating shoulder injury were treated with double internal fixation of clavicle and scapula and intraoperative reduction of glenopolar angle. There were 11 males and 2 females with an average age of 48 years (range, 25-65 years). The causes of injury included falling from height in 2 cases, traffic accident injury in 3 cases, heavy object injury in 2 cases, and other injuries in 6 cases. There were 2 cases of Ⅰ-B-3 type, 1 case of Ⅰ-C-2 type, 1 case of Ⅰ-C-3 type, 3 cases of Ⅱ-B-2 type, 1 case of Ⅱ-B-3 type, 1 case of Ⅱ-B-4 type, 2 cases of Ⅱ-C-2 type, 1 case of Ⅱ-C-4 type, and 1 case of Ⅱ-D-3 type according to the classification of floating shoulder injury. All patients had unilateral clavicle fracture with scapular neck fracture, 1-4 superior shoulder suspensory complex (SSSC) injuries. The time from injury to operation was 7-17 days, with an average of 12 days. The glenopolar angle, subacromail space, anteroposterior inclination angle of scapular glenoid, scapular glenoid up and down angle were measured before and after operation; Constant-Murly score and Herscovici score were used to evaluate the recovery of shoulder joint function.
RESULTS: All incisions healed by first intention, and there was no early postoperative complications such as infection. All 13 cases were followed up 12-48 months, with an average of 25.2 months. Both the clavicle and the scapula had bone union, and the average healing time was 6 months and 4 months respectively. There were no complications such as nonunion, shoulder deformity, plate fracture or failure of internal fixation, acromion impingement syndrome, and frozen shoulder. At last follow-up, the glenopolar angle, subacromail space, anteroposterior inclination angle of scapular glenoid, and scapular glenoid up and down angle were all corrected significantly ( P<0.05). The pain, function, activity, muscle strength scores, and total score in Constant-Murly score were significantly improved when compared with preoperative scores ( P<0.05). According to the Herscovici scoring standard, the shoulder joint function was evaluated as excellent in 8 cases, good in 3 cases, and fair in 2 cases. The excellent and good rate was 84.6%.
CONCLUSION: Double internal fixation of clavicle and scapula to stabilize SSSC and reduct glenopolar angle during operation is an effective method for treating the floating shoulder injury.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Floating shoulder injury; clavicle; glenopolar angle; internal fixation; scapula; superior shoulder suspensory complex

Mesh:

Year:  2021        PMID: 33448203      PMCID: PMC8171606          DOI: 10.7507/1002-1892.202007104

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Zhongguo Xiu Fu Chong Jian Wai Ke Za Zhi        ISSN: 1002-1892


  25 in total

1.  The floating shoulder: ipsilateral clavicle and scapular neck fractures.

Authors:  D Herscovici; A G Fiennes; M Allgöwer; T P Rüedi
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Br       Date:  1992-05

2.  A prospective study comparing conservative with operative treatment in patients with a 'floating shoulder' including assessment of the prognostic value of the glenopolar angle.

Authors:  V Yadav; G N Khare; S Singh; V Kumaraswamy; N Sharma; A K Rai; A G Ramaswamy; H Sharma
Journal:  Bone Joint J       Date:  2013-06       Impact factor: 5.082

3.  Posterior glenoid rim deficiency in recurrent (atraumatic) posterior shoulder instability.

Authors:  D Weishaupt; M Zanetti; R W Nyffeler; C Gerber; J Hodler
Journal:  Skeletal Radiol       Date:  2000-04       Impact factor: 2.199

Review 4.  Decision-making for complex scapula and ipsilateral clavicle fractures: a review.

Authors:  Florian Hess; Ralph Zettl; Daniel Smolen; Christoph Knoth
Journal:  Eur J Trauma Emerg Surg       Date:  2018-03-23       Impact factor: 3.693

5.  Fracture and Dislocation Classification Compendium-2018

Authors:  Eric G Meinberg; Julie Agel; Craig S Roberts; Matthew D Karam; James F Kellam
Journal:  J Orthop Trauma       Date:  2018-01       Impact factor: 2.512

6.  Conservative treatment of scapular neck fracture: the effect of stability and glenopolar angle on clinical outcome.

Authors:  Murat Bozkurt; Filiz Can; Vecihi Kirdemir; Zafer Erden; Ismail Demirkale; Mustafa Başbozkurt
Journal:  Injury       Date:  2005-07-27       Impact factor: 2.586

7.  The floating shoulder: a biomechanical basis for classification and management.

Authors:  G R Williams; J Naranja; J Klimkiewicz; A Karduna; J P Iannotti; M Ramsey
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  2001-08       Impact factor: 5.284

8.  Can the glenopolar angle be used to predict outcome and treatment of the floating shoulder?

Authors:  Kyung-Cheon Kim; Kwang-Jin Rhee; Hyun-Dae Shin; Jun-Young Yang
Journal:  J Trauma       Date:  2008-01

9.  Triple Disruption of the Superior Shoulder Suspensory Complex - A Case Report.

Authors:  Vamshi Kiran Badam; T S S Harsha; Sukesh Rao Sankineani; Kamalakar Rao Rachakonda; Chandrasekhar Bodanki; A V Gurava Reddy
Journal:  J Orthop Case Rep       Date:  2019

10.  Functional outcomes and clinical strength assessment after infraspinatus-sparing surgical approach to scapular fracture: Does it really make a difference?

Authors:  Giuseppe Porcellini; Paolo Palladini; Stefano Congia; Alessandro Palmas; Giovanni Merolla; Antonio Capone
Journal:  J Orthop Traumatol       Date:  2018-09-05
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.