Literature DB >> 33447952

A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of the Diagnostic Accuracy of the Advanced Clinical Solutions Word Choice Test as a Performance Validity Test.

Matthew T Bernstein1, Zachary J Resch2,3, Gabriel P Ovsiew2, Jason R Soble2,4.   

Abstract

Thorough assessment of performance validity has become an established standard of practice in neuropsychological assessment. While there has been a large focus on the development and cross-validation of embedded performance validity tests (PVTs) in recent years, new freestanding PVTs have also been developed, including the Word Choice Test (WCT) as part of the Advanced Clinical Solutions Effort System. And, while the WCT's general utility for identifying invalid performance has been demonstrated in the ensuing decade since its initial publication, optimal cut-scores and associated psychometric properties have varied widely across studies. This study sought to synthesize the existing diagnostic accuracy literature regarding the WCT via a systematic review and to conduct a meta-analysis to determine the performance validity cut-score that best maximizes sensitivity while maintaining acceptable specificity. A systematic search of the literature resulted in 14 studies for synthesis, with eight of those available for meta-analysis. Meta-analytic results revealed an optimal cut-score of ≤ 42 with 54% sensitivity and 93% specificity for identifying invalid neuropsychological test performance. Collectively, the WCT demonstrated adequate diagnostic accuracy as a PVT across a variety of populations. Recommendations for future studies are also provided.

Keywords:  Diagnostic accuracy; Meta-analysis; Performance validity; Systematic review; WCT; Word choice test

Year:  2021        PMID: 33447952     DOI: 10.1007/s11065-020-09468-y

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Neuropsychol Rev        ISSN: 1040-7308            Impact factor:   7.444


  10 in total

1.  Detection of inadequate effort on neuropsychological testing: a meta-analytic review of selected procedures.

Authors:  C D Vickery; D T Berry; T H Inman; M J Harris; S A Orey
Journal:  Arch Clin Neuropsychol       Date:  2001-01       Impact factor: 2.813

2.  Hypothesis tests for population heterogeneity in meta-analysis.

Authors:  Wolfgang Viechtbauer
Journal:  Br J Math Stat Psychol       Date:  2007-05       Impact factor: 3.380

3.  Detecting and describing heterogeneity in meta-analysis.

Authors:  R J Hardy; S G Thompson
Journal:  Stat Med       Date:  1998-04-30       Impact factor: 2.373

4.  Convergent, Discriminant, and Concurrent Validity of Nonmemory-Based Performance Validity Tests.

Authors:  Troy A Webber; Edan A Critchfield; Jason R Soble
Journal:  Assessment       Date:  2018-10-06

5.  Not so fast! Limitations of processing speed and working memory indices as embedded performance validity tests in a mixed neuropsychiatric sample.

Authors:  Gabriel P Ovsiew; Zachary J Resch; Kritika Nayar; Christopher P Williams; Jason R Soble
Journal:  J Clin Exp Neuropsychol       Date:  2020-06-04       Impact factor: 2.475

Review 6.  Performance validity testing in neuropsychology: a clinical guide, critical review, and update on a rapidly evolving literature.

Authors:  Sara M Lippa
Journal:  Clin Neuropsychol       Date:  2017-11-28       Impact factor: 3.535

7.  Utility of various WAIS-IV Digit Span indices for identifying noncredible performance validity among cognitively impaired and unimpaired examinees.

Authors:  Troy A Webber; Jason R Soble
Journal:  Clin Neuropsychol       Date:  2017-12-19       Impact factor: 3.535

8.  Cognitive impairment does not cause invalid performance: analyzing performance patterns among cognitively unimpaired, impaired, and noncredible participants across six performance validity tests.

Authors:  Edan Critchfield; Jason R Soble; Janice C Marceaux; Kathleen M Bain; K Chase Bailey; Troy A Webber; W Alex Alverson; Johanna Messerly; David Andrés González; Justin J F O'Rourke
Journal:  Clin Neuropsychol       Date:  2018-11-26       Impact factor: 3.535

9.  Cross-validation of non-memory-based embedded performance validity tests for detecting invalid performance among patients with and without neurocognitive impairment.

Authors:  Daniel J White; Dale Korinek; Matthew T Bernstein; Gabriel P Ovsiew; Zachary J Resch; Jason R Soble
Journal:  J Clin Exp Neuropsychol       Date:  2020-05-13       Impact factor: 2.475

10.  Embedded Performance Validity Tests in the Hopkins Verbal Learning Test-Revised and the Brief Visuospatial Memory Test-Revised: A Replication Study.

Authors:  K Chase Bailey; Jason R Soble; Kathleen M Bain; Chrystal Fullen
Journal:  Arch Clin Neuropsychol       Date:  2018-11-01       Impact factor: 2.813

  10 in total
  1 in total

Review 1.  Future Directions in Performance Validity Assessment to Optimize Detection of Invalid Neuropsychological Test Performance: Special Issue Introduction.

Authors:  Jason R Soble
Journal:  Psychol Inj Law       Date:  2021-09-22
  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.