Literature DB >> 33447886

Colonization of a novel host by fleas: changes in egg production and egg size.

Nadezhda A Stavtseva1,2, Laura J Fielden3, Irina S Khokhlova1, Elizabeth M Warburton2,4, Luther van der Mescht1,2,5, Boris R Krasnov6.   

Abstract

We studied the success of fleas, Synosternus cleopatrae and Xenopsylla ramesis, in switching to a novel host by establishing experimental lines maintained on different hosts for 18 generations. Fleas fed on principal (P-line) or novel hosts, either sympatric with (S-line) or allopatric to (A-line) a flea and its principal host, then we assessed their reproductive performance via the number and size of eggs. We compared reproductive performance between hosts within a line and between lines within a host asking: (a) whether fleas adapt to a novel host species after multiple generations; (b) if yes, whether the pattern of adaptation differs between novel host species sympatric with or allopatric to a flea and its principal host; and (c) adaptation to a novel host is accompanied with a loss of success in exploitation of an original host. Fleas from the S- and A-lines increased their egg production on a novel host (except X. ramesis from the S-line). S. cleopatrae from the S-line but not the A-line increased egg size on a novel host, whereas X. ramesis from the A-line but not the S-line produced larger eggs from a novel host. We found no indication of a loss of reproductive performance on the original host while adapting to a novel host. We conclude that fleas are able to switch rapidly to a new host with the pattern of a switch to either sympatric or an allopatric host depending on the identities of both flea and host species.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Allopatric; Egg number; Egg size; Principal host; Sympatric

Year:  2021        PMID: 33447886     DOI: 10.1007/s00436-021-07052-8

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Parasitol Res        ISSN: 0932-0113            Impact factor:   2.289


  23 in total

1.  Perspective: models of speciation: what have we learned in 40 years?

Authors:  Sergey Gavrilets
Journal:  Evolution       Date:  2003-10       Impact factor: 3.694

2.  When do parasites fail to speciate in response to host speciation?

Authors:  Kevin P Johnson; Richard J Adams; Roderic D M Page; Dale H Clayton
Journal:  Syst Biol       Date:  2003-02       Impact factor: 15.683

3.  Digesting blood of an auxiliary host in fleas: effect of phylogenetic distance from a principal host.

Authors:  Irina S Khokhlova; Laura J Fielden; A Allan Degen; Boris R Krasnov
Journal:  J Exp Biol       Date:  2012-04-15       Impact factor: 3.312

4.  Evolution of host-parasite associations among species of lice and rock-wallabies: coevolution? (J. F. A. Sprent Prize lecture, August 1990).

Authors:  S C Barker
Journal:  Int J Parasitol       Date:  1991-09       Impact factor: 3.981

5.  Use it or lose it: reproductive implications of ecological specialization in a haematophagous ectoparasite.

Authors:  A Arbiv; I S Khokhlova; O Ovadia; A Novoplansky; B R Krasnov
Journal:  J Evol Biol       Date:  2012-03-30       Impact factor: 2.411

6.  Ecological fitting by phenotypically flexible genotypes: implications for species associations, community assembly and evolution.

Authors:  Salvatore J Agosta; Jeffrey A Klemens
Journal:  Ecol Lett       Date:  2008-09-04       Impact factor: 9.492

Review 7.  Experimental evolution of parasites.

Authors:  D Ebert
Journal:  Science       Date:  1998-11-20       Impact factor: 47.728

8.  Phylogenetic trees support the coevolution of parasites and their hosts.

Authors:  M S Hafner; S A Nadler
Journal:  Nature       Date:  1988-03-17       Impact factor: 49.962

9.  GENERAL-PURPOSE GENOTYPES FOR HOST SPECIES UTILIZATION IN A NEMATODE PARASITE OF DROSOPHILA.

Authors:  John Jaenike; Irene Dombeck
Journal:  Evolution       Date:  1998-06       Impact factor: 3.694

10.  Understanding Host-Switching by Ecological Fitting.

Authors:  Sabrina B L Araujo; Mariana Pires Braga; Daniel R Brooks; Salvatore J Agosta; Eric P Hoberg; Francisco W von Hartenthal; Walter A Boeger
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-10-02       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.