Literature DB >> 33447793

Into the well-A close look at the complex structures of a microtiter biofilm and the crystal violet assay.

Kasper Nørskov Kragh1,2, Maria Alhede1, Lasse Kvich1, Thomas Bjarnsholt1,2.   

Abstract

The microtiter assay is one of the most widely used methods for assessing biofilm formation. Though it has high throughput, this assay is known for its substantial deviation from experiment to experiment, and even from well to well. Since the assay constitutes one of the pillars of biofilm research, it was decided to examine the wells of a microtiter plate directly during growth, treatment, and the steps involved in crystal violet (CV) measurements. An inverted Zeiss LSM 880 confocal laser scanning microscope was used to visualize and quantify biomass directly in the wells of the microtiter plate. Green fluorescent protein-tagged Pseudomonas aeruginosa, PAO1, and live/dead stains were used to assess the structure, state, and position of biomass build-up. Microscopic observations were compared with colony-forming unit (CFU) and CV measurements. The development and the structured architecture of biomass was observed in real-time in the wells. Three-dimensional images of biomass were obtained from all of the microtiter wells; these showed variations from well to well. CV staining showed large variations in remaining biomass, depending on the method selected to remove the supernatant prior to CV staining (i.e. pipetting or manually discarding the fluid by inversion, washed or unwashed wells). Colony-forming unit counts or live/dead staining used to evaluate biomass with or without antibiotic treatment proved imprecise due to aggregation, limited removal of biomass, and overestimation of dead staining. The highly structured microenvironment of biomass in microtiter wells needs to be considered when designing and analyzing experiments. When using microtiter plates, stochastic variation due to growth and handling may lead to flawed conclusions. It is therefore recommended that this assay be used as a screening tool rather than as a stand-alone experimental tool.
© 2019 The Authors.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Biofilm; Confocal laser scanning microscopy; Crystal violet; In vitro validation; Microtiter assay; Pseudomonas aeruginosa

Year:  2019        PMID: 33447793      PMCID: PMC7798451          DOI: 10.1016/j.bioflm.2019.100006

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Biofilm        ISSN: 2590-2075


  12 in total

Review 1.  Microtiter plate assays to assess antibiofilm activity against bacteria.

Authors:  Evan F Haney; Michael J Trimble; Robert E W Hancock
Journal:  Nat Protoc       Date:  2021-04-28       Impact factor: 13.491

2.  Impact of phosphate concentration on the metabolome of biofilms of the marine bacterium Pseudoalteromonas lipolytica.

Authors:  Nathan Carriot; Raphaëlle Barry-Martinet; Jean-François Briand; Annick Ortalo-Magné; Gérald Culioli
Journal:  Metabolomics       Date:  2022-03-15       Impact factor: 4.290

3.  A Humanized Monoclonal Antibody Potentiates Killing of Diverse Biofilm-Forming Respiratory Tract Pathogens by Antibiotics.

Authors:  Nikola Kurbatfinski; Steven D Goodman; Lauren O Bakaletz
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  2022-01-10       Impact factor: 5.938

4.  Effect of host-mimicking medium and biofilm growth on the ability of colistin to kill Pseudomonas aeruginosa.

Authors:  Esther Sweeney; Akshay Sabnis; Andrew M Edwards; Freya Harrison
Journal:  Microbiology (Reading)       Date:  2020-12       Impact factor: 2.777

5.  In Vitro Evaluation of Polihexanide, Octenidine and NaClO/HClO-Based Antiseptics against Biofilm Formed by Wound Pathogens.

Authors:  Grzegorz Krasowski; Adam Junka; Justyna Paleczny; Joanna Czajkowska; Elżbieta Makomaska-Szaroszyk; Grzegorz Chodaczek; Michał Majkowski; Paweł Migdał; Karol Fijałkowski; Beata Kowalska-Krochmal; Marzenna Bartoszewicz
Journal:  Membranes (Basel)       Date:  2021-01-17

6.  Milieu matters: An in vitro wound milieu to recapitulate key features of, and probe new insights into, mixed-species bacterial biofilms.

Authors:  Snehal Kadam; Vandana Madhusoodhanan; Radhika Dhekane; Devyani Bhide; Rutuja Ugale; Utkarsha Tikhole; Karishma S Kaushik
Journal:  Biofilm       Date:  2021-04-03

7.  Evaluation of the Antimicrobial Efficacy of N-Acetyl-l-Cysteine, Rhamnolipids, and Usnic Acid-Novel Approaches to Fight Food-Borne Pathogens.

Authors:  Ondrej Chlumsky; Heidi J Smith; Albert E Parker; Kristen Brileya; James N Wilking; Sabina Purkrtova; Hana Michova; Pavel Ulbrich; Jitka Viktorova; Katerina Demnerova
Journal:  Int J Mol Sci       Date:  2021-10-20       Impact factor: 5.923

8.  Real-time monitoring of Pseudomonas aeruginosa biofilm growth dynamics and persister cells' eradication.

Authors:  Miglė Žiemytė; Miguel Carda-Diéguez; Juan C Rodríguez-Díaz; Maria P Ventero; Alex Mira; María D Ferrer
Journal:  Emerg Microbes Infect       Date:  2021-12       Impact factor: 7.163

9.  Biofilm-Forming Ability of Microbacterium lacticum and Staphylococcus capitis Considering Physicochemical and Topographical Surface Properties.

Authors:  Elena Zand; Hedwig Pfanner; Konrad J Domig; Gerhard Sinn; Marija Zunabovic-Pichler; Henry Jaeger
Journal:  Foods       Date:  2021-03-13

10.  Interlaboratory study for the evaluation of three microtiter plate-based biofilm quantification methods.

Authors:  Jontana Allkja; Frits van Charante; Juliana Aizawa; Inés Reigada; Clara Guarch-Pérez; Jesus Augusto Vazquez-Rodriguez; Paul Cos; Tom Coenye; Adyary Fallarero; Sebastian A J Zaat; Antonio Felici; Livia Ferrari; Nuno F Azevedo; Albert E Parker; Darla M Goeres
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2021-07-02       Impact factor: 4.379

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.