Minjuan Li1, Dantong Shao1, Jiachen Zhou2, Jianhua Gu1, Junjie Qin3, Wen Chen4, Wenqiang Wei1. 1. National Central Cancer Registry, National Cancer Center/National Clinical Research Center for Cancer/Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing 100021, China. 2. Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, School of Public Health, Xi'an Jiaotong University Health Science Center, Xi'an 710061, China. 3. Promegene Translational Research Institute, Shenzhen 518000, China. 4. Department of Cancer Epidemiology, National Cancer Center/National Clinical Research Center for Cancer/Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing 100021, China.
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: Esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC) is one of the dominant malignances worldwide, but currently there is less focus on the microbiota with ESCC and its precancerous lesions. METHODS: Paired esophageal biopsy and swab specimens were obtained from 236 participants in Linzhou, China. Data from 16S ribosomal RNA gene sequencing were processed using quantitative insights into microbial ecology (QIIME2) and R Studio to evaluate differences. The Wilcoxon rank sum test and Kruskal-Wallis rank sum test were used to compare diversity and characteristic genera by specimens and participant groups. Ordinal logistic regression model was used to build microbiol prediction model. RESULTS: Microbial diversity was similar between biopsy and swab specimens, including operational taxonomic unit (OTU) numbers and Shannon index. There were variations and similarities of esophageal microbiota among different pathological characteristics of ESCC. Top 10 relative abundance genera in all groups include Streptococcus, Prevotella, Veillonella, Actinobacillus, Haemophilus, Neisseria, Alloprevotella, Rothia, Gemella and Porphyromonas. Genus Streptococcus, Haemophilus, Neisseria and Porphyromonas showed significantly difference in disease groups when compared to normal control, whereas Streptococcus showed an increasing tendency with the progression of ESCC and others showed a decreasing tendency. About models based on all combinations of characteristic genera, only taken Streptococcus and Neisseria into model, the prediction performance was the ideal one, of which the area under the curve (AUC) was 0.738. CONCLUSIONS: Esophageal biopsy and swab specimens could yield similar microbial characterization. The combination of Streptococcus and Neisseria has the potential to predict the progression of ESCC, which is needed to confirm by large-scale, prospective cohort studies.
OBJECTIVE: Esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC) is one of the dominant malignances worldwide, but currently there is less focus on the microbiota with ESCC and its precancerous lesions. METHODS: Paired esophageal biopsy and swab specimens were obtained from 236 participants in Linzhou, China. Data from 16S ribosomal RNA gene sequencing were processed using quantitative insights into microbial ecology (QIIME2) and R Studio to evaluate differences. The Wilcoxon rank sum test and Kruskal-Wallis rank sum test were used to compare diversity and characteristic genera by specimens and participant groups. Ordinal logistic regression model was used to build microbiol prediction model. RESULTS: Microbial diversity was similar between biopsy and swab specimens, including operational taxonomic unit (OTU) numbers and Shannon index. There were variations and similarities of esophageal microbiota among different pathological characteristics of ESCC. Top 10 relative abundance genera in all groups include Streptococcus, Prevotella, Veillonella, Actinobacillus, Haemophilus, Neisseria, Alloprevotella, Rothia, Gemella and Porphyromonas. Genus Streptococcus, Haemophilus, Neisseria and Porphyromonas showed significantly difference in disease groups when compared to normal control, whereas Streptococcus showed an increasing tendency with the progression of ESCC and others showed a decreasing tendency. About models based on all combinations of characteristic genera, only taken Streptococcus and Neisseria into model, the prediction performance was the ideal one, of which the area under the curve (AUC) was 0.738. CONCLUSIONS: Esophageal biopsy and swab specimens could yield similar microbial characterization. The combination of Streptococcus and Neisseria has the potential to predict the progression of ESCC, which is needed to confirm by large-scale, prospective cohort studies.
Authors: T Z DeSantis; P Hugenholtz; N Larsen; M Rojas; E L Brodie; K Keller; T Huber; D Dalevi; P Hu; G L Andersen Journal: Appl Environ Microbiol Date: 2006-07 Impact factor: 4.792
Authors: Zhiheng Pei; Liying Yang; Richard M Peek; Steven M Jr Levine; David T Pride; Martin J Blaser Journal: World J Gastroenterol Date: 2005-12-14 Impact factor: 5.742
Authors: Liying Yang; Xiaohua Lu; Carlos W Nossa; Fritz Francois; Richard M Peek; Zhiheng Pei Journal: Gastroenterology Date: 2009-04-23 Impact factor: 22.682
Authors: Guoqin Yu; Mitchell H Gail; Jianxin Shi; Vanja Klepac-Ceraj; Bruce J Paster; Bruce A Dye; Guo-Qing Wang; Wen-Qiang Wei; Jin-Hu Fan; You-Lin Qiao; Sanford M Dawsey; Neal D Freedman; Christian C Abnet Journal: Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev Date: 2014-04-03 Impact factor: 4.254
Authors: Alevtina Gall; Jutta Fero; Connor McCoy; Brian C Claywell; Carissa A Sanchez; Patricia L Blount; Xiaohong Li; Thomas L Vaughan; Frederick A Matsen; Brian J Reid; Nina R Salama Journal: PLoS One Date: 2015-06-15 Impact factor: 3.240
Authors: Alain J Benitez; Christian Hoffmann; Amanda B Muir; Kara K Dods; Jonathan M Spergel; Frederic D Bushman; Mei-Lun Wang Journal: Microbiome Date: 2015-06-01 Impact factor: 14.650
Authors: Daffolyn R Fels Elliott; Alan W Walker; Maria O'Donovan; Julian Parkhill; Rebecca C Fitzgerald Journal: Lancet Gastroenterol Hepatol Date: 2016-11-12
Authors: Susan M Huse; Vincent B Young; Hilary G Morrison; Dionysios A Antonopoulos; John Kwon; Sushila Dalal; Rose Arrieta; Nathaniel A Hubert; Lici Shen; Joseph H Vineis; Jason C Koval; Mitchell L Sogin; Eugene B Chang; Laura E Raffals Journal: Microbiome Date: 2014-02-14 Impact factor: 14.650