Kurt Warnhoff1,2, Thomas W Hercher3, Ralf R Mendel3, Gary Ruvkun1,2. 1. Department of Molecular Biology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts 02114. 2. Department of Genetics, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts 02115. 3. Braunschweig University of Technology, 38106 Braunschweig, Germany.
Abstract
The molybdenum cofactor (Moco) is a 520-Da prosthetic group that is synthesized in all domains of life. In animals, four oxidases (among them sulfite oxidase) use Moco as a prosthetic group. Moco is essential in animals; humans with mutations in genes that encode Moco biosynthetic enzymes display lethal neurological and developmental defects. Moco supplementation seems a logical therapy; however, the instability of Moco has precluded biochemical and cell biological studies of Moco transport and bioavailability. The nematode Caenorhabditis elegans can take up Moco from its bacterial diet and transport it to cells and tissues that express Moco-requiring enzymes, suggesting a system for Moco uptake and distribution. Here we show that protein-bound Moco is the stable, bioavailable species of Moco taken up by C. elegans from its diet and is an effective dietary supplement, rescuing a C elegans model of Moco deficiency. We demonstrate that diverse Moco:protein complexes are stable and bioavailable, suggesting a new strategy for the production and delivery of therapeutically active Moco to treat human Moco deficiency.
The molybdenum cofactor (Moco) is a 520-Da prosthetic group that is synthesized in all domains of life. In animals, four oxidases (among them sulfite oxidase) use Moco as a prosthetic group. Moco is essential in animals; humans with mutations in genes that encode Moco biosynthetic enzymes display lethal neurological and developmental defects. Moco supplementation seems a logical therapy; however, the instability of Moco has precluded biochemical and cell biological studies of Moco transport and bioavailability. The nematode Caenorhabditis elegans can take up Moco from its bacterial diet and transport it to cells and tissues that express Moco-requiring enzymes, suggesting a system for Moco uptake and distribution. Here we show that protein-bound Moco is the stable, bioavailable species of Moco taken up by C. elegans from its diet and is an effective dietary supplement, rescuing a C elegans model of Moco deficiency. We demonstrate that diverse Moco:protein complexes are stable and bioavailable, suggesting a new strategy for the production and delivery of therapeutically active Moco to treat human Moco deficiency.
The molybdenum cofactor (Moco) is an ancient coenzyme that was present in the last universal common ancestor and that continues to be synthesized in all domains of life (Zhang and Gladyshev 2008; Weiss et al. 2016). Moco is a pterin-based organic prosthetic group that is comprised of a C6-substituted pyrano ring, a terminal phosphate, and a dithiolate group binding to molybdenum (Fig. 1A; Rajagopalan and Johnson 1992). In humans and other animals, Moco is required for the activity of four enzymes: sulfite oxidase, xanthine oxidase, aldehyde oxidase, and mitochondrial amidoxime reducing component (Schwarz et al. 2009). There are two forms of eukaryotic Moco: the sulfite oxidase form and the xanthine oxidase form (Fig. 1A). These Moco species differ in the third Mo-S ligand, which is provided either by an enzyme-derived cysteine residue (sulfite oxidase form) or an inorganic sulfur (xanthine oxidase form) (Schwarz et al. 2009). The xanthine oxidase form of Moco is synthesized from the sulfite oxidase form via the enzyme Moco sulfurase (Fig. 1A; Bittner et al. 2001).
Figure 1.
C. elegans acquires Moco from dietary E. coli. (A) C. elegans Moco biosynthesis pathway (red) and orthologous enzymes in E. coli (black) are displayed. Moco and its biosynthetic intermediates are displayed (purple): GTP is guanosine triphosphate (1), cPMP is cyclic pyranopterin monophosphate (2), MPT is molybdopterin (3), MPT-AMP is MPT-adenine monophosphate (4), Moco is the molybdenum cofactor (5), Moco (SO) is the sulfite oxidase form of the molybdenum cofactor (6), and Moco (XO) is the xanthine oxidase form of the molybdenum cofactor (7). C. elegans Moco sulfurase (MOCS-1) has no clear homolog in E. coli, although xdhC is the likely functional analog (Neumann et al. 2007). (B) Wild-type and moc-1(ok366) C. elegans were synchronized at the L1 stage and cultured on mixtures of wild-type E. coli (synthesizes Moco) and ΔmoaA E. coli (cannot synthesize Moco) for 72 h. The Y-axis shows animal length (µm), where 1000 µm roughly corresponds to fertile adulthood and 250 µm roughly corresponds to the L1 stage. Average and standard deviation are displayed for each condition analyzed. Sample size (n) was 10 individual animals assayed for each condition.
C. elegans acquires Moco from dietary E. coli. (A) C. elegans Moco biosynthesis pathway (red) and orthologous enzymes in E. coli (black) are displayed. Moco and its biosynthetic intermediates are displayed (purple): GTP is guanosine triphosphate (1), cPMP is cyclic pyranopterin monophosphate (2), MPT is molybdopterin (3), MPT-AMP is MPT-adenine monophosphate (4), Moco is the molybdenum cofactor (5), Moco (SO) is the sulfite oxidase form of the molybdenum cofactor (6), and Moco (XO) is the xanthine oxidase form of the molybdenum cofactor (7). C. elegans Moco sulfurase (MOCS-1) has no clear homolog in E. coli, although xdhC is the likely functional analog (Neumann et al. 2007). (B) Wild-type and moc-1(ok366) C. elegans were synchronized at the L1 stage and cultured on mixtures of wild-type E. coli (synthesizes Moco) and ΔmoaA E. coli (cannot synthesize Moco) for 72 h. The Y-axis shows animal length (µm), where 1000 µm roughly corresponds to fertile adulthood and 250 µm roughly corresponds to the L1 stage. Average and standard deviation are displayed for each condition analyzed. Sample size (n) was 10 individual animals assayed for each condition.Both forms of Moco are synthesized by a highly conserved biosynthetic pathway (Fig. 1A; Mendel 2013). The genes necessary for Moco biosynthesis were first elucidated by genetic studies of chlorate resistance in bacteria (MacGregor 1975). The importance of Moco biosynthesis to human health is highlighted by Moco deficiency (MoCD), a rare inborn error of metabolism. MoCD is caused by loss-of-function mutations in genes encoding any of the human Moco biosynthetic enzymes and results in severe neurological dysfunction and neonatal lethality (Reiss and Hahnewald 2011; Huijmans et al. 2017). MoCD patients with mutations in MOCS1 (orthologous to bacterial moaA and moaC) can be treated with cyclic pyranopterin monophosphate (cPMP), a stable intermediate in Moco biosynthesis immediately downstream from MOCS1 (Veldman et al. 2010). However, cPMP treatment is not effective for patients with mutations in any of the downstream Moco biosynthetic enzymes. Purification and delivery of mature Moco would be an ideal therapeutic strategy for treating all forms of MoCD; however, free Moco is too unstable and oxygen-sensitive to be purified and therapeutically administered (Johnson et al. 1980; Mendel 1983). Furthermore, it is unclear whether mature Moco can cross cellular membranes.Genetic evidence demonstrates that the nematode C. elegans retrieves Moco as well as cPMP from its bacterial diet (Warnhoff and Ruvkun 2019). However, nothing was known about the biochemical mechanism of Moco transfer between these two highly divergent organisms. Here we propose that Moco bound to protein is the stable and bioavailable Moco species that is harvested by C. elegans. We demonstrate that supplementation of purified protein-bound Moco rescues the lethality of Moco-deficient C. elegans feeding on Moco-deficient E. coli. We show that Moco bound to diverse Moco-containing proteins originating from bacteria, algae, fungi, and mammals, is bioavailable to C. elegans, and that this supplementation does not require Moco biosynthetic enzymes in C. elegans or its bacterial diet. This work suggests future mammalian therapeutic studies of supplemental protein-bound Moco and highlights the existence of a pathway for Moco transport.
Results and Discussion
C. elegans acquires Moco from dietary E. coli
Due to its instability, Moco has long been thought to be synthesized and used cell autonomously. So far only C. elegans has been described to have two pathways by which it can obtain Moco: endogenous Moco biosynthesis from GTP or dietary uptake of Moco (Warnhoff and Ruvkun 2019). Moco biosynthetic enzymes are conserved in all domains of life; in C. elegans these enzymes are encoded by the moc genes that mediate sequential steps in Moco biosynthesis (Fig. 1A). Using mutations in the C. elegans moc genes [i.e., the moc-1(ok366) null mutation] Moco biosynthesis can be interrupted in all cells. In the laboratory, C. elegans feed on a monoculture of E. coli. Thus, we can also use mutations in any of the genes of the E. coli Moco biosynthetic pathway to eliminate dietary Moco (i.e., the ΔmoaA-null mutation). Either endogenous Moco synthesis in C. elegans or Moco produced by the diet E. coli and then consumed by C. elegans can support growth, development, and reproduction of C. elegans. However, when C. elegans cannot synthesize their own Moco and cannot obtain Moco from their diet, they arrest larval development and die due to inactivity of sulfite oxidase, the key Moco-using enzyme in animals (Warnhoff and Ruvkun 2019).To test how much wild-type, Moco-producing bacteria was required to support growth and development of C. elegans defective in Moco biosynthesis, we mixed wild-type and ΔmoaA mutant E. coli at various ratios and tested for the ability of these mixtures to support the viability of moc-1 mutant C. elegans. We found that a substantial fraction (about 30%) of the E. coli diet needed to be wild type (Moco producing) to support growth and development of moc-1 mutant animals (Fig. 1B).
Moco bound to diverse proteins is taken up and used by C. elegans
We hypothesized that C. elegans harvest bacterial Moco that is bound within the E. coli Moco-using enzymes. E. coli YiiM (EcYiiM) is one such Moco-using enzyme and mediates the reduction of N-hydroxylated substrates (Kozmin et al. 2008; Namgung et al. 2018). To test whether Moco bound to EcYiiM can be absorbed by C. elegans, we purified recombinant EcYiiM protein from E. coli and used it to supplement the diet of Moco biosynthetic mutant C. elegans feeding on Moco-deficient E. coli, growth conditions that would otherwise result in 100% larval arrest and death. Consistent with the model that C. elegans harvests Moco from E. coli Moco-using enzymes, moc-1 mutant animals grown on Moco-deficient E. coli grew and developed well when their diet was supplemented with EcYiiM-bound Moco. (Fig. 2A,B). Thus, EcYiiM-bound Moco is bioavailable and can support the viability of otherwise Moco-deficient C. elegans.
Figure 2.
C. elegans uses Moco from diverse Moco-containing proteins. (A) moc-1(ok366) mutant C. elegans were synchronized at the L1 stage and cultured for 72 h on ΔmoaA E. coli supplemented with Moco bound to Escherichia coli YiiM (EcYiiM), Volvox carteri Moco carrier protein (VcMCP), Neurospora crassa nitrate reductase (NcNR), or bovine xanthine oxidase (BtXO), or equivalent amounts of VcMCP purified from bacteria that cannot synthesize Moco (−Moco). EcYiiM, VcMCP, and NcNR (+Moco) each contained 7.7 nmol of Moco, while BtXO (+Moco) contained 8.8 nmol of Moco. Box plots display the median, upper, and lower quartiles, while whiskers indicate minimum and maximum data points. Sample size (n) is displayed for each experiment. (B) moc-1(ok366) mutant C. elegans were synchronized at the L1 stage and cultured on ΔmoaA E. coli supplemented with variable amounts of Moco bound to EcYiiM (0.0077, 0.077, 0.77, 1.93, 3.85, or 7.7 nmol of Moco, blue), VcMCP, (0.0077, 0.077, 0.77, 1.93, 3.85, 7.7, or 15.8 nmol of Moco, orange) or BtXO (0.018, 0.18, 1.8, 4.38, 8.75, or 17.5 nmol of Moco, brown). For each experiment, animals were allowed to develop for 72 h and animal lengths were determined. Mean and standard deviation are displayed for each data point. Sample size (n) was 10 individuals assayed for each data point. (C,D) Representative images of moc-1(ok366) C. elegans cultured for 72 h on ΔmoaA E. coli supplemented with 7.7nmol of Moco bound to VcMCP (C) or equivalent amounts of apo-VcMCP (−Moco) (D). Blue arrowhead indicates a fertile adult, while yellow arrowheads denote animals arrested early in larval development. Scale bar, 250 µm.
C. elegans uses Moco from diverse Moco-containing proteins. (A) moc-1(ok366) mutant C. elegans were synchronized at the L1 stage and cultured for 72 h on ΔmoaA E. coli supplemented with Moco bound to Escherichia coli YiiM (EcYiiM), Volvox carteri Moco carrier protein (VcMCP), Neurospora crassa nitrate reductase (NcNR), or bovine xanthine oxidase (BtXO), or equivalent amounts of VcMCP purified from bacteria that cannot synthesize Moco (−Moco). EcYiiM, VcMCP, and NcNR (+Moco) each contained 7.7 nmol of Moco, while BtXO (+Moco) contained 8.8 nmol of Moco. Box plots display the median, upper, and lower quartiles, while whiskers indicate minimum and maximum data points. Sample size (n) is displayed for each experiment. (B) moc-1(ok366) mutant C. elegans were synchronized at the L1 stage and cultured on ΔmoaA E. coli supplemented with variable amounts of Moco bound to EcYiiM (0.0077, 0.077, 0.77, 1.93, 3.85, or 7.7 nmol of Moco, blue), VcMCP, (0.0077, 0.077, 0.77, 1.93, 3.85, 7.7, or 15.8 nmol of Moco, orange) or BtXO (0.018, 0.18, 1.8, 4.38, 8.75, or 17.5 nmol of Moco, brown). For each experiment, animals were allowed to develop for 72 h and animal lengths were determined. Mean and standard deviation are displayed for each data point. Sample size (n) was 10 individuals assayed for each data point. (C,D) Representative images of moc-1(ok366) C. elegans cultured for 72 h on ΔmoaA E. coli supplemented with 7.7nmol of Moco bound to VcMCP (C) or equivalent amounts of apo-VcMCP (−Moco) (D). Blue arrowhead indicates a fertile adult, while yellow arrowheads denote animals arrested early in larval development. Scale bar, 250 µm.To test whether the ability of C. elegans to harvest Moco from protein was more general to other Moco-binding proteins, we recombinantly expressed and purified two additional Moco-binding proteins in E. coli; nitrate reductase from the red bread mold Neurospora crassa (NcNR) and Moco-carrier protein from the green algae Volvox carteri (VcMCP) (Witte et al. 1998; Fischer et al. 2005; Hercher et al. 2020b). We also used the commercially available Moco-using enzyme xanthine oxidase (BtXO) purified from bovine milk (Enroth et al. 2000). Each Moco-binding protein was supplemented to moc-1 mutant C. elegans fed ΔmoaA mutant E. coli. Similar to EcYiiM, supplementation with Moco bound to either VcMCP or NcNR supported the growth of moc-1 mutant C. elegans in the absence of any other dietary Moco (Fig. 2). To a lesser extent, BtXO supplementation also supported the growth of moc-1 mutant animals cultured on Moco-deficient E. coli (Fig. 2A,B). A possible explanation for the reduced efficacy of supplemental BtXO compared with EcYiiM, VcMCP, or NcNR might be the form of Moco that is bound by these proteins. BtXO binds the xanthine oxidase form of Moco, while EcYiiM, VcMCP, and NcNR bind the sulfite oxidase form of Moco (Fig. 1A; Fischer et al. 2005; Hille et al. 2014; Namgung et al. 2018; Hercher et al. 2020b). In C. elegans and other animals, sulfite oxidase (SUOX-1) is the key Moco-requiring enzyme necessary for viability; suox-1 null mutant animals arrest development similar to Moco-deficient animals (Warnhoff and Ruvkun 2019). We speculate that supplementation with the sulfite oxidase form of Moco can supply the appropriate Moco to support C. elegans SUOX-1 activity, whereas the supplementation with the xanthine oxidase form of Moco cannot. Alternatively, supplementation with the sulfite oxidase form of Moco may result in the partial conversion, via Moco sulfurase (encoded by C. elegans mocs-1), of that supplemental Moco into the xanthine oxidase form (Fig. 1A). Thus, by providing the sulfite oxidase form of Moco we may be providing both forms of eukaryotic Moco making it a more effective treatment for complete Moco deficiency in C. elegans. Supplementation with the xanthine oxidase form of Moco would likely not result in synthesis of the sulfite oxidase form of Moco as there is no known enzyme that desulfurates the xanthine oxidase form of Moco.To further demonstrate that the growth of C. elegans moc-1 mutant animals was conferred by supplementation of the Moco prosthetic group and not by the supplemental purified proteins, we purified apo-VcMCP from bacteria unable to synthesize Moco. Supplemental apo-VcMCP did not support the growth of moc-1 mutant C. elegans fed ΔmoaA mutant E. coli (Fig. 2A,C,D). Taken together these data demonstrate that the animal C. elegans is able to acquire and harvest the Moco prosthetic group when it is provided as a dietary supplement in complex with Moco-binding proteins. These proteins have diverse structures and functions and originate from both prokaryotes and eukaryotes. As such, the acquisition of protein-bound Moco by C. elegans is not specific to certain Moco-binding proteins and may reflect a general strategy for acquisition of functional Moco from the animals’ diet or microbiome. The remaining experiments were all performed with supplemental Moco bound to VcMCP due to its well-characterized role in Moco binding and our established protocols for its production (Witte et al. 1998; Hercher et al. 2020b).One model for the rescue of C. elegans Moco deficiency is that supplemental protein-bound Moco is directly ingested by C. elegans. Alternatively, the protein-bound Moco may first be taken up by E. coli, which may process the Moco to then be ingested by C. elegans. To distinguish between these models, we grew ΔmoaA mutant E. coli in lysogeny broth (LB) supplemented with Moco bound to VcMCP. This ΔmoaA E. coli was then separated from the culture medium by centrifugation, washed extensively, and fed to moc-1 mutant C. elegans (“diet B” in Fig. 3). Although cultured with Moco bound to VcMCP, the washed ΔmoaA E. coli in diet B did not support growth of moc-1 mutant animals. Importantly, the supernatant medium from the same culture supported the growth of moc-1 mutant C. elegans grown on a lawn of ΔmoaA E. coli grown separately in LB alone (“diet A” in Fig. 3B). While we cannot completely exclude an active role for bacteria in the transfer of Moco to C. elegans under natural conditions, these data suggest that supplemental protein-bound Moco does not pass through a bacterial intermediate before being acquired by C. elegans (Fig. 3B).
Figure 3.
Protein-bound Moco is directly ingested by C. elegans. (A) Experimental protocol used to generate “diet A” and “diet B” in B. ΔmoaA mutant E. coli were cultured overnight at 37°C in 500 µL of LB supplemented with 39 nmol of VcMCP-bound Moco. Bacterial cells were then concentrated, and the supernatant was removed for use in “diet A.” Bacterial cells were washed, resuspended in LB, and seeded onto NGM to be fed to moc-1(ok366) C. elegans (“diet B”). The supernatant from this culture (spent LB + VcMCP media) was filtered (0.20-µm filter, Corning) to remove remaining bacterial cells and used to resuspend a separate concentrated culture of ΔmoaA mutant E. coli that was grown only in LB. This was then seeded onto NGM to be fed to moc-1(ok366) C. elegans (“diet A”). (B) moc-1(ok366) mutant C. elegans were synchronized at the L1 stage and cultured on wild-type E. coli, ΔmoaA E. coli, “diet A,” or “diet B” (see A for diet A and B descriptions). For each experiment, animals were allowed to develop for 48 h. Box plots display the median, upper, and lower quartiles while whiskers indicate minimum and maximum data points. Sample size (n) was 10 individuals assayed for each experiment.
Protein-bound Moco is directly ingested by C. elegans. (A) Experimental protocol used to generate “diet A” and “diet B” in B. ΔmoaA mutant E. coli were cultured overnight at 37°C in 500 µL of LB supplemented with 39 nmol of VcMCP-bound Moco. Bacterial cells were then concentrated, and the supernatant was removed for use in “diet A.” Bacterial cells were washed, resuspended in LB, and seeded onto NGM to be fed to moc-1(ok366) C. elegans (“diet B”). The supernatant from this culture (spent LB + VcMCP media) was filtered (0.20-µm filter, Corning) to remove remaining bacterial cells and used to resuspend a separate concentrated culture of ΔmoaA mutant E. coli that was grown only in LB. This was then seeded onto NGM to be fed to moc-1(ok366) C. elegans (“diet A”). (B) moc-1(ok366) mutant C. elegans were synchronized at the L1 stage and cultured on wild-type E. coli, ΔmoaA E. coli, “diet A,” or “diet B” (see A for diet A and B descriptions). For each experiment, animals were allowed to develop for 48 h. Box plots display the median, upper, and lower quartiles while whiskers indicate minimum and maximum data points. Sample size (n) was 10 individuals assayed for each experiment.
Moco bound to protein is stable
The instability and oxygen sensitivity of Moco has limited cell biological studies of Moco transport and precluded it from therapeutic consideration (Schwarz 2016). The VcMCP-bound Moco used in “diet A” (Fig. 3) was incubated overnight at 37°C and still retained its activity and bioavailability, suggesting remarkable stability. To biochemically demonstrate the stability of Moco bound to protein, we measured the ability of mature Moco to stay in complex with VcMCP, EcYiiM, NcNR, and BtXO over time (Fig. 4). Free Moco is highly unstable; however, it can be oxidized to “form A,” a stable and fluorescent Moco derivative that is quantifiable via HPLC (Johnson et al. 1980; Hercher et al. 2020a). Using measurements of form A and protein concentration, we first determined the initial Moco occupancy of purified VcMCP (22%) as well as EcYiiM (4%), NcNR (50%), and BtXO (50%) (Fig. 4A,B). We then assessed the stability of each purified Moco:protein complex by determining Moco retention over time at different temperatures (Fig. 4C–F). All four Moco:protein complexes were remarkably stable, showing no significant protein degradation and retaining between 43% and 83% of their original Moco content after 96 h of incubation at ambient temperature (Fig. 4C–F). This stability is surprising and suggests purification of protein-bound Moco as a new strategy for the production and delivery of therapeutically active Moco to treat MoCD.
Figure 4.
Stability of protein-bound Moco. (A) Moco occupancies for purified EcYiiM, VcMCP, NcNR, and BtXO were determined by measurements of the Moco derivative form A and protein concentration. Moco occupancy is the percentage of protein molecules that are bound by a Moco prosthetic group. Moco occupancy was determined for VcMCP purified from Moco-producing (+Moco) and Moco-deficient (−Moco) E. coli. The sample size (n) is displayed for each protein and each data point is individually presented with the mean and standard deviation. (B) Protein gel demonstrating the purity of VcMCP purified from Moco-deficient E. coli (1), VcMCP (2), EcYiiM (3), and NcNR purified from Moco-producing E. coli (4), and BtXO purified from bovine milk (5). The gel displays all protein using the TGX stain-free system (Bio-Rad). (C–F) The amount of stable Moco retained by VcMCP (C), EcYiiM (D), NcNR (E), and BtXO (F) was determined over 96 h at 4°C (black) or 22°C (red). Moco retention of VcMCP was also assessed at 37°C (pink). The Y-axis displays the Moco retention as a percentage of the original Moco occupancies (time 0) presented in A. The sample size (n) is three to six replicates per protein and time point. The mean and standard deviation are displayed.
Stability of protein-bound Moco. (A) Moco occupancies for purified EcYiiM, VcMCP, NcNR, and BtXO were determined by measurements of the Moco derivative form A and protein concentration. Moco occupancy is the percentage of protein molecules that are bound by a Moco prosthetic group. Moco occupancy was determined for VcMCP purified from Moco-producing (+Moco) and Moco-deficient (−Moco) E. coli. The sample size (n) is displayed for each protein and each data point is individually presented with the mean and standard deviation. (B) Protein gel demonstrating the purity of VcMCP purified from Moco-deficient E. coli (1), VcMCP (2), EcYiiM (3), and NcNR purified from Moco-producing E. coli (4), and BtXO purified from bovine milk (5). The gel displays all protein using the TGX stain-free system (Bio-Rad). (C–F) The amount of stable Moco retained by VcMCP (C), EcYiiM (D), NcNR (E), and BtXO (F) was determined over 96 h at 4°C (black) or 22°C (red). Moco retention of VcMCP was also assessed at 37°C (pink). The Y-axis displays the Moco retention as a percentage of the original Moco occupancies (time 0) presented in A. The sample size (n) is three to six replicates per protein and time point. The mean and standard deviation are displayed.
Bioavailability of recombinant protein-bound Moco does not depend on known Moco biosynthetic enzymes in E. coli or C. elegans
We tested whether the Moco biosynthetic enzymes are necessary for the harvesting or transport of supplemental protein-bound Moco using mutants in the dietary E. coli. We tested moc-1 mutant C. elegans growth on wild-type bacteria, or mutant bacteria lacking the genes necessary for Moco biosynthesis. moc-1 mutant animals were grown on mutant E. coli with and without supplemental Moco bound to VcMCP. moc-1 mutant C. elegans grew well on wild-type E. coli but displayed larval arrest on all 10 E. coli mutants defective in Moco biosynthesis (Supplemental Fig. S1). Supplemental Moco bound to VcMCP supported growth and development of moc-1 mutant C. elegans on all 10 of the Moco biosynthetic mutant E. coli, demonstrating that none of these E. coli genes were necessary for bioavailability of supplemental protein-bound Moco (Supplemental Fig. S1).Alternatively, we speculated that the Moco biosynthetic machinery of C. elegans might play a role in the bioavailability of supplemental protein-bound Moco. To test this, we used established C. elegans mutants in the Moco biosynthetic pathway (Fig. 1A). Each of these C. elegans moc mutants was cultured on wild-type E. coli, ΔmoaA E. coli, or ΔmoaA E. coli supplemented with Moco bound to VcMCP. All of the moc mutant animals grew well on wild-type bacteria and arrested growth on ΔmoaA E. coli (Supplemental Fig. S2A–E). Each C. elegans moc mutant displayed dramatically improved growth on ΔmoaA E. coli when their diet was supplemented with Moco bound to VcMCP (Supplemental Fig. S2A–E). These results demonstrate that moc-5, moc-4, moc-3, moc-2, and moc-1 are not required for the bioavailability of supplemental protein-bound Moco. Thus, the machinery that facilitates Moco transport is distinct from the canonical Moco biosynthetic pathway.
Supplemental protein-bound Moco supports the activity of C. elegans SUOX-1
The lethality associated with Moco deficiency in C. elegans and humans is due to inactivity of sulfite oxidase (SUOX-1), a mitochondrial Moco-requiring enzyme that oxidizes the lethal toxin sulfite to sulfate. Like Moco biosynthesis, sulfite oxidase is essential in both C. elegans and humans (Mudd et al. 1967; Warnhoff and Ruvkun 2019). Thus, to rescue development of otherwise Moco-deficient C. elegans, supplemental protein-bound Moco must be incorporated into and support the activity of C. elegans SUOX-1. To demonstrate this, we used the hypomorphic suox-1 allele gk738847 (D391N) (Thompson et al. 2013). Aspartic acid 391 of sulfite oxidase is highly conserved and is present in C. elegans and humans. The SUOX-1 D391N amino acid substitution causes partial SUOX-1 loss of function that is enhanced when dietary Moco is absent. Growing suox-1(gk738847) mutant C. elegans on Moco-deficient E. coli causes a severe developmental delay compared with its growth on wild-type Moco-producing E coli (Supplemental Fig. S2F; Warnhoff and Ruvkun 2019). Importantly, suox-1(gk738847) mutant animals are wild type for their endogenous Moco biosynthetic pathway and are able to synthesize Moco de novo. This result shows that suox-1(gk738847) mutant C. elegans depend on both endogenous Moco biosynthesis as well as dietary sources of Moco to fully support the activity of mutant SUOX-1 D391N protein.We hypothesized that supplemental Moco bound by VcMCP would improve the viability of suox-1(gk738847) animals grown on ΔmoaA E. coli. To test this, we cultured suox-1(gk738847) mutant animals on wild-type E. coli, ΔmoaA E. coli, and ΔmoaA E. coli supplemented with Moco bound to VcMCP. Consistent with our rescue of C. elegans Moco deficiency, supplemental protein-bound Moco improved the growth of suox-1(gk738847) animals grown on Moco-deficient E. coli (Supplemental Fig. S2F). These results suggest that exogenous protein-bound Moco is absorbed, harvested, distributed to requisite cells, and reinserted into the C. elegans SUOX-1 enzyme. Uncovering the cellular mechanisms that facilitate these processes is an important goal of future research. Pathways for absorption and distribution of heme and vitamin B12 serve as useful paradigms for the possible mechanisms of Moco transport. These metal-containing prosthetic groups require chaperones (Dieckgraefe et al. 1988; Chen et al. 2011), receptors (Moestrup et al. 1998), and transporters (Rajagopal et al. 2008) to facilitate their movement among cells and tissues. We anticipate similar systems will coordinate the transport of Moco in C. elegans and humans.Our data demonstrate the ability of an essential protein-packaged prosthetic group to cross cell membranes. We show that this transfer occurs naturally between multiple organisms and among the cells and tissues of a single organism. Because Moco biosynthesis and utilization is as ancient as the last universal common ancestor, the unknown Moco transport pathway is likely to be general to all animals. Furthermore, roughly 70% of bacterial genomes encode Moco biosynthetic enzymes making the intestinal microbiome a potential reservoir for this cofactor (Zhang and Gladyshev 2008). Similarly, the human diet might also be a source of exogenous protein-bound Moco as most plants and animals synthesize and use Moco. Our results with the nematode C. elegans may stimulate future exploration of the therapeutic potential of protein-bound Moco (from dietary, microbiome, or recombinant sources) for the treatment of MoCD.
Materials and methods
General methods and strains
C. elegans strains were cultured using established protocols (Brenner 1974). The wild-type strain of C. elegans was Bristol N2. C. elegans mutant strains used in this work are listed here. LGI: GR2253 moc-4(ok2571). LGIV: MH3266 moc-3(ku300). LGV: GR2255 moc-2(mg595). LGX: GR2254 moc-1(ok366), GR2256 moc-5(mg589), and GR2269 suox-1(gk738847).E. coli strains were cultured using standard methods. The wild-type strain of E. coli was BW25113, the parental strain of the Keio E. coli knockout collection (Baba et al. 2006). The E. coli mutants used in this work were JW0764 (ΔmoaA::Kanr), KJW1 (Δmog), KJW2 (ΔmoaA), KJW3 (ΔmoaC), KJW4(ΔmoaD), KJW5(ΔmoaE), KJW6(ΔmoeB), KJW7(ΔmoeA), KJW8(ΔmodA), KJW9(ΔmodC), and KJW10(ΔydaV) (Baba et al. 2006; Warnhoff and Ruvkun 2019). Strains KJW1-KJW10 were only used to produce the data in Supplemental Figure S1. JW0764 was used in all other experiments with ΔmoaA E. coli.
C. elegans growth assays
C. elegans were synchronized at the first stage of larval development (L1), then cultured on NGM seeded with wild-type or mutant E. coli. For some experiments, growth conditions were supplemented with various forms and amounts of protein-bound Moco. For experiments with supplemental protein-bound Moco, we report the total amount of Moco added to the C. elegans growth conditions and assume equal protein diffusion through the solid agarose media during the experiments. C. elegans animals were allowed to grow and develop for 48 or 72 h (specified in the figure legends) at 20°C. Sample size (n) is individual animals measured and is reported in the figures and figure legends.Live animals were imaged using an Axio Zoom.V16 microscope (Zeiss) equipped with an ORCA-Flash4.0 digital camera (Hamamatsu). Images were captured using Zen software (Zeiss) and processed with ImageJ (NIH). Animal length was measured from the tip of the head to the end of the tail. The median and upper and lower quartiles were calculated using GraphPad Prism software.
Purification and characterization of Moco-binding proteins
Moco-binding proteins were expressed and purified using standard methods (Hercher et al. 2020a). The full-length yiiM coding sequence was amplified from Escherichia coli DH5α (EcYiiM) and the full-length Moco carrier protein coding sequence from Volvox carteri (VcMCP) was synthesized and codon optimized for E. coli (Hercher et al. 2020b). The coding sequence for Neurospora crassa nitrate reductase (NcNR) was shortened to include only the Moco-binding and dimerization region (amino acids 113–592). The coding sequences for EcYiiM, VcMCP, and NcNR were inserted into the pONE-CP plasmid, producing proteins fused to a C-terminal Streptavidin tag. Streptavidin-tagged proteins were expressed using the E. coli strain TP1000, which accumulates Moco due to a deletion in the Mob operon (Palmer et al. 1996). As a negative control, VcMCP was also purified from the E. coli strain RK5204, which is unable to produce Moco (Stewart and MacGregor 1982). Bovine xanthine oxidase (BtXO) was purchased from Sigma-Aldrich (X1875, batch SLCB1289).Protein concentrations were determined using absorption at 280 nm and the Pierce BCA protein assay (Thermo Scientific). Absorption was measured using a Multiskan GO microplate spectrophotometer (Thermo Scientific). Quantification of Moco content of the proteins was conducted using HPLC-based measurements of form A, a stable and fluorescent Moco oxidation product (Hercher et al. 2020a). Stability of protein-bound Moco was assessed by incubating the Moco:protein complexes for 96 h at various temperatures (4°C, 22°C, and 37°C). In 24-h intervals, protein samples were centrifuged at 4°C to remove precipitated protein, and protein concentration and Moco content were determined as described above.
Authors: Alex Veldman; José Angel Santamaria-Araujo; Silvio Sollazzo; James Pitt; Robert Gianello; Joy Yaplito-Lee; Flora Wong; Clive Andrew Ramsden; Jochen Reiss; Iain Cook; Jon Fairweather; Guenter Schwarz Journal: Pediatrics Date: 2010-04-12 Impact factor: 7.124
Authors: Madeline C Weiss; Filipa L Sousa; Natalia Mrnjavac; Sinje Neukirchen; Mayo Roettger; Shijulal Nelson-Sathi; William F Martin Journal: Nat Microbiol Date: 2016-07-25 Impact factor: 17.745
Authors: Owen Thompson; Mark Edgley; Pnina Strasbourger; Stephane Flibotte; Brent Ewing; Ryan Adair; Vinci Au; Iasha Chaudhry; Lisa Fernando; Harald Hutter; Armelle Kieffer; Joanne Lau; Norris Lee; Angela Miller; Greta Raymant; Bin Shen; Jay Shendure; Jon Taylor; Emily H Turner; LaDeana W Hillier; Donald G Moerman; Robert H Waterston Journal: Genome Res Date: 2013-06-25 Impact factor: 9.043