Literature DB >> 33446318

The normative Western Ontario Rotator Cuff Index values for age and sex.

Julie R A Massier1, Nienke Wolterbeek1, Ronald N Wessel2.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The Western Ontario Rotator Cuff Index (WORC) is a widely used disease-specific outcome tool developed for patients with rotator cuff injuries. The determination of age- and sex-adjusted normative WORC values enables us to determine whether a procedure is more beneficial in specific patient groups because the results can be compared with a matched standard. The purpose of this study was to determine normative WORC values and assess whether the WORC needs an adjusted score for age and sex.
METHODS: We included participants using an online data-capturing program. We collected the following variables: age, sex, presence of shoulder pathology, Subjective Shoulder Value, and WORC score. We defined the mean normative WORC score per age category and analyzed sex differences in WORC scores per age category and in all domains of the WORC score.
RESULTS: A total of 470 participants filled out the questionnaire. We excluded 44 participants because of pre-existing shoulder complaints or incomplete questionnaires. The mean total WORC score was 94% (standard deviation, 9%), and the mean total WORC score in every age and sex category was >90%. Of all participants, 85% scored between 91% and 100%; 63 participants (15%) scored 100%. The mean overall Subjective Shoulder Value was 98% (standard deviation, 6%). We found no statistically significant differences between sexes in the overall score, in the domain scores, and within the age categories.
CONCLUSION: We defined normative values for the WORC questionnaire in a random prospective cohort and found no difference in scores between sexes. The mean normative scores all were within the variance of the maximum, and the WORC score did not deteriorate with age. It seems that the results of this subjective questionnaire change with the participant's perspective. An adjusted WORC score for age and sex is not necessary. This information can serve as a basis for comparison with patients with shoulder disease.
Copyright © 2020 Journal of Shoulder and Elbow Surgery Board of Trustees. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Normative values; WORC; outcome tool; rotator cuff injuries; shoulder questionnaire

Year:  2020        PMID: 33446318     DOI: 10.1016/j.jse.2020.09.026

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Shoulder Elbow Surg        ISSN: 1058-2746            Impact factor:   3.019


  2 in total

Review 1.  Risk factors for full-thickness rotator cuff tears: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Jinlong Zhao; Jianke Pan; Ling-Feng Zeng; Ming Wu; Weiyi Yang; Jun Liu
Journal:  EFORT Open Rev       Date:  2021-11-19

Review 2.  Risk Factors for Supraspinatus Tears: A Meta-analysis of Observational Studies.

Authors:  Jinlong Zhao; Minghui Luo; Guihong Liang; Ming Wu; Jianke Pan; Ling-Feng Zeng; Weiyi Yang; Jun Liu
Journal:  Orthop J Sports Med       Date:  2021-10-12
  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.