Cecilia L Moore1, Anna Turkova2, Hilda Mujuru3, Adeodata Kekitiinwa4, Abbas Lugemwa5, Cissy M Kityo6, Linda N Barlow-Mosha7, Tim R Cressey8,9,10, Avy Violari11, Ebrahim Variava12, Mark F Cotton13, Moherndran Archary14, Alexandra Compagnucci15, Thanyawee Puthanakit16, Osee Behuhuma17, Yacine Saϊdi15, James Hakim3, Pauline Amuge4, Lorna Atwine5, Victor Musiime6, David M Burger18, Clare Shakeshaft2, Carlo Giaquinto19, Pablo Rojo20, Diana M Gibb2, Deborah Ford2. 1. Medical Research Council Clinical Trials Unit at University College London, London, United Kingdom. c.moore@ucl.ac.uk. 2. Medical Research Council Clinical Trials Unit at University College London, London, United Kingdom. 3. University of Zimbabwe Clinical Research Centre, Harare, Zimbabwe. 4. Baylor College of Medicine Children's Foundation, Kampala, Uganda. 5. Joint Clinical Research Centre, Mbarara, Uganda. 6. Joint Clinical Research Centre, Kampala, Uganda. 7. MUJHU Research Collaboration, Kampala, Uganda. 8. PHPT/IRD 174, Faculty of Associated Medical Sciences, Chiang Mai University, Chiang Mai, Thailand. 9. Department of Immunology & Infectious Diseases, Harvard T. H Chan School of Public Health, Boston, USA. 10. Department of Molecular & Clinical Pharmacology, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, UK. 11. Perinatal HIV Research Unit, Johannesburg, South Africa. 12. Klerksdorp Tshepong Hospital Complex, Matlosana, South Africa. 13. Family Center for Research with Ubuntu, Cape Town, South Africa. 14. Durban International Clinical Research Site, Durban, South Africa. 15. INSERM/ANRS SC10-US19, Paris, France. 16. HIVNAT, Thai Red Cross AIDS Research Center and Department of Pediatrics, Faculty of Medicine, Chulalongkorn University, Bangkok, Thailand. 17. Africa Health Research Institute, Hlabisa Hospital, Hlabisa, South Africa. 18. Department of Clinical Pharmacy and Nijmegen Institute for Infection, Inflammation and Immunity (N4i), Radboud University, Nijmegen, The Netherlands. 19. University of Padova, Padova, Italy. 20. Hospital 12 de Octubre, Madrid, Spain.
Abstract
BACKGROUND:Dolutegravir (DTG)-based antiretroviral therapy (ART) is highly effective and well-tolerated in adults and is rapidly being adopted globally. We describe the design of the ODYSSEY trial which evaluates the efficacy and safety of DTG-based ART compared with standard-of-care in children and adolescents. The ODYSSEY trial includes nested pharmacokinetic (PK) sub-studies which evaluated pragmatic World Health Organization (WHO) weight-band-based DTG dosing and opened recruitment to children < 14 kg while dosing was in development. METHODS: ODYSSEY (Once-daily DTG based ART in Young people vS. Standard thErapY) is an open-label, randomised, non-inferiority, basket trial comparing the efficacy and safety of DTG + 2 nucleos(t) ides (NRTIs) versus standard-of-care (SOC) in HIV-infected children < 18 years starting first-line ART (ODYSSEY A) or switching to second-line ART (ODYSSEY B). The primary endpoint is clinical or virological failure by 96 weeks. RESULTS:Between September 2016 and June 2018, 707 children weighing ≥14 kg were enrolled; including 311 ART-naïve children and 396 children starting second-line. 47% of children were enrolled in Uganda, 21% Zimbabwe, 20% South Africa, 9% Thailand, 4% Europe. 362 (51%) participants were male; median age [range] at enrolment was 12.2 years [2.9-18.0]. 82 (12%) children weighed 14 to < 20 kg, 135 (19%) 20 to < 25 kg, 206 (29%) 25 to < 35 kg, 284 (40%) ≥35 kg. 128 (18%) had WHO stage 3 and 60 (8%) WHO stage 4 disease. Challenges encountered include: (i) running the trial across high- to low-income countries with differing frequencies of standard-of-care viral load monitoring; (ii) evaluating pragmatic DTG dosing in PK sub-studies alongside FDA- and EMA-approved dosing and subsequently transitioning participants to new recommended doses; (iii) delays in dosing information for children weighing 3 to < 14 kg and rapid recruitment of ART-naïve older/heavier children, which led to capping recruitment of participants weighing ≥35 kg in ODYSSEY A and extending recruitment (above 700) to allow for ≥60 additional children weighing between 3 to < 14 kg with associated PK; (iv) a safety alert associated with DTG use during pregnancy, which required a review of the safety plan for adolescent girls. CONCLUSIONS: By employing a basket design, to include ART-naïve and -experienced children, and nested PK sub-studies, the ODYSSEY trial efficiently evaluates multiple scientific questions regarding dosing and effectiveness of DTG-based ART in children. TRIAL REGISTRATION: NCT, NCT02259127 , registered 7th October 2014; EUDRACT, 2014-002632-14, registered 18th June 2014 ( https://www.clinicaltrialsregister.eu/ctr-search/trial/2014-002632-14/ES ); ISRCTN, ISRCTN91737921 , registered 4th October 2014.
RCT Entities:
BACKGROUND:Dolutegravir (DTG)-based antiretroviral therapy (ART) is highly effective and well-tolerated in adults and is rapidly being adopted globally. We describe the design of the ODYSSEY trial which evaluates the efficacy and safety of DTG-based ART compared with standard-of-care in children and adolescents. The ODYSSEY trial includes nested pharmacokinetic (PK) sub-studies which evaluated pragmatic World Health Organization (WHO) weight-band-based DTG dosing and opened recruitment to children < 14 kg while dosing was in development. METHODS: ODYSSEY (Once-daily DTG based ART in Young people vS. Standard thErapY) is an open-label, randomised, non-inferiority, basket trial comparing the efficacy and safety of DTG + 2 nucleos(t) ides (NRTIs) versus standard-of-care (SOC) in HIV-infectedchildren < 18 years starting first-line ART (ODYSSEY A) or switching to second-line ART (ODYSSEY B). The primary endpoint is clinical or virological failure by 96 weeks. RESULTS: Between September 2016 and June 2018, 707 children weighing ≥14 kg were enrolled; including 311 ART-naïve children and 396 children starting second-line. 47% of children were enrolled in Uganda, 21% Zimbabwe, 20% South Africa, 9% Thailand, 4% Europe. 362 (51%) participants were male; median age [range] at enrolment was 12.2 years [2.9-18.0]. 82 (12%) children weighed 14 to < 20 kg, 135 (19%) 20 to < 25 kg, 206 (29%) 25 to < 35 kg, 284 (40%) ≥35 kg. 128 (18%) had WHO stage 3 and 60 (8%) WHO stage 4 disease. Challenges encountered include: (i) running the trial across high- to low-income countries with differing frequencies of standard-of-care viral load monitoring; (ii) evaluating pragmatic DTG dosing in PK sub-studies alongside FDA- and EMA-approved dosing and subsequently transitioning participants to new recommended doses; (iii) delays in dosing information for children weighing 3 to < 14 kg and rapid recruitment of ART-naïve older/heavier children, which led to capping recruitment of participants weighing ≥35 kg in ODYSSEY A and extending recruitment (above 700) to allow for ≥60 additional children weighing between 3 to < 14 kg with associated PK; (iv) a safety alert associated with DTG use during pregnancy, which required a review of the safety plan for adolescent girls. CONCLUSIONS: By employing a basket design, to include ART-naïve and -experienced children, and nested PK sub-studies, the ODYSSEY trial efficiently evaluates multiple scientific questions regarding dosing and effectiveness of DTG-based ART in children. TRIAL REGISTRATION: NCT, NCT02259127 , registered 7th October 2014; EUDRACT, 2014-002632-14, registered 18th June 2014 ( https://www.clinicaltrialsregister.eu/ctr-search/trial/2014-002632-14/ES ); ISRCTN, ISRCTN91737921 , registered 4th October 2014.
Authors: François Raffi; Hans Jaeger; Eugenia Quiros-Roldan; Helmut Albrecht; Elena Belonosova; Jose M Gatell; Jean-Guy Baril; Pere Domingo; Clare Brennan; Steve Almond; Sherene Min Journal: Lancet Infect Dis Date: 2013-09-25 Impact factor: 25.071
Authors: R S Boerma; K C E Sigaloff; A S Akanmu; S Inzaule; M Boele van Hensbroek; T F Rinke de Wit; J C Calis Journal: J Antimicrob Chemother Date: 2016-12-20 Impact factor: 5.790
Authors: Francois Raffi; Anita Rachlis; Hans-Jürgen Stellbrink; W David Hardy; Carlo Torti; Chloe Orkin; Mark Bloch; Daniel Podzamczer; Vadim Pokrovsky; Federico Pulido; Steve Almond; David Margolis; Clare Brennan; Sherene Min Journal: Lancet Date: 2013-01-08 Impact factor: 79.321
Authors: Rebecca Zash; Lewis Holmes; Modiegi Diseko; Denise L Jacobson; Sean Brummel; Gloria Mayondi; Arielle Isaacson; Sonya Davey; Judith Mabuta; Mompati Mmalane; Tendani Gaolathe; M Essex; Shahin Lockman; Joseph Makhema; Roger L Shapiro Journal: N Engl J Med Date: 2019-07-22 Impact factor: 91.245
Authors: Ragna S Boerma; T Sonia Boender; Anton P Bussink; Job C J Calis; Silvia Bertagnolio; Tobias F Rinke de Wit; Michael Boele van Hensbroek; Kim C E Sigaloff Journal: Clin Infect Dis Date: 2016-09-22 Impact factor: 9.079
Authors: Chloe Lanyon; Janet Seeley; Stella Namukwaya; Victor Musiime; Sara Paparini; Helen Nakyambadde; Christine Matama; Anna Turkova; Sarah Bernays Journal: J Int AIDS Soc Date: 2020-09 Impact factor: 5.396
Authors: Theodore D Ruel; Edward P Acosta; Jessica P Liu; Kathryn P Gray; Kathleen George; Nicole Montañez; Stephanie Popson; Ann M Buchanan; Mattie Bartlett; Dale Dayton; Patricia Anthony; Cynthia Brothers; Cynthia Vavro; Rajendra Singh; Lucy Koech; Tichaona Vhembo; Blandina T Mmbaga; Jorge A Pinto; Els F M Dobbels; Moherndran Archary; Kulkanya Chokephaibulkit; Pradthana Ounchanum; Jaime G Deville; Rohan Hazra; Ellen Townley; Andrew Wiznia Journal: Lancet HIV Date: 2022-05 Impact factor: 16.070
Authors: Deborah Ford; Ian R White; Rebecca M Turner; Anna Turkova; Cecilia L Moore; Alasdair Bamford; Moherndran Archary; Linda N Barlow-Mosha; Mark F Cotton; Tim R Cressey; Elizabeth Kaudha; Abbas Lugemwa; Hermione Lyall; Hilda A Mujuru; Veronica Mulenga; Victor Musiime; Pablo Rojo; Gareth Tudor-Williams; Steven B Welch; Diana M Gibb Journal: BMC Med Res Methodol Date: 2022-02-20 Impact factor: 4.615
Authors: Rachel C Vreeman; Natella Y Rakhmanina; Winstone M Nyandiko; Thanyawee Puthanakit; Rami Kantor Journal: J Int AIDS Soc Date: 2021-06 Impact factor: 5.396