Max Riekeles1, Janosch Schirmack1, Dirk Schulze-Makuch1,2,3,4. 1. Astrobiology Group, Center of Astronomy and Astrophysics, Technical University Berlin, 10623 Berlin, Germany. 2. Section Geomicrobiology, GFZ German Center for Geosciences, 14473 Potsdam, Germany. 3. Department of Experimental Limnology, Leibniz-Institute of Freshwater Ecology and Inland Fisheries (IGB), 16775 Stechlin, Germany. 4. School of the Environment, Washington State University, Pullman, WA 99164, USA.
Abstract
(1) Background: Future missions to potentially habitable places in the Solar System require biochemistry-independent methods for detecting potential alien life forms. The technology was not advanced enough for onboard machine analysis of microscopic observations to be performed in past missions, but recent increases in computational power make the use of automated in-situ analyses feasible. (2) Methods: Here, we present a semi-automated experimental setup, capable of distinguishing the movement of abiotic particles due to Brownian motion from the motility behavior of the bacteria Pseudoalteromonas haloplanktis, Planococcus halocryophilus, Bacillus subtilis, and Escherichia coli. Supervised machine learning algorithms were also used to specifically identify these species based on their characteristic motility behavior. (3) Results: While we were able to distinguish microbial motility from the abiotic movements due to Brownian motion with an accuracy exceeding 99%, the accuracy of the automated identification rates for the selected species does not exceed 82%. (4) Conclusions: Motility is an excellent biosignature, which can be used as a tool for upcoming life-detection missions. This study serves as the basis for the further development of a microscopic life recognition system for upcoming missions to Mars or the ocean worlds of the outer Solar System.
(1) Background: Future missions to potentially habitable places in the Solar System require biochemistry-independent methods for detecting potential alien life forms. The technology was not advanced enough for onboard machine analysis of microscopic observations to be performed in past missions, but recent increases in computational power make the use of automated in-situ analyses feasible. (2) Methods: Here, we present a semi-automated experimental setup, capable of distinguishing the movement of abiotic particles due to Brownian motion from the motility behavior of the bacteria Pseudoalteromonas haloplanktis, Planococcus halocryophilus, Bacillus subtilis, and Escherichia coli. Supervised machine learning algorithms were also used to specifically identify these species based on their characteristic motility behavior. (3) Results: While we were able to distinguish microbial motility from the abiotic movements due to Brownian motion with an accuracy exceeding 99%, the accuracy of the automated identification rates for the selected species does not exceed 82%. (4) Conclusions: Motility is an excellent biosignature, which can be used as a tool for upcoming life-detection missions. This study serves as the basis for the further development of a microscopic life recognition system for upcoming missions to Mars or the ocean worlds of the outer Solar System.
Entities:
Keywords:
automation; biosignature; life detection; machine learning; motility; species identification
Authors: Boris Wilmes; Angelika Hartung; Michael Lalk; Manuel Liebeke; Thomas Schweder; Peter Neubauer Journal: Microb Cell Fact Date: 2010-09-21 Impact factor: 5.328
Authors: Christian A Lindensmith; Stephanie Rider; Manuel Bedrossian; J Kent Wallace; Eugene Serabyn; G Max Showalter; Jody W Deming; Jay L Nadeau Journal: PLoS One Date: 2016-01-26 Impact factor: 3.240
Authors: Megan M Dubay; Nikki Johnston; Mark Wronkiewicz; Jake Lee; Christian A Lindensmith; Jay L Nadeau Journal: Front Microbiol Date: 2022-04-21 Impact factor: 6.064