Literature DB >> 33445636

Automatic Assessment of Keel Bone Damage in Laying Hens at the Slaughter Line.

Lisa Jung1, Abozar Nasirahmadi2, Jan Schulte-Landwehr3, Ute Knierim1.   

Abstract

Keel bone damage (KBD) can be found in all commercial laying hen flocks with a wide range of 23% to 69% of hens/flock found to be affected in this study. As KBD may be linked with chronic pain and a decrease in mobility, it is a serious welfare problem. An automatic assessment system at the slaughter line could support the detection of KBD and would have the advantage of being standardized and fast scoring including high sample sizes. A 2MP stereo camera combined with an IDS imaging color camera was used for the automatic assessment. A trained human assessor visually scored KBD in defeathered hens during the slaughter process and compared results with further human assessors and automatic recording. In a first step, an algorithm was developed on the basis of assessments of keel status of 2287 hens of different genetics with varying degrees of KBD. In two optimization steps, performance data were calculated, and flock prevalences were determined, which were compared between the assessor and the automatic system. The proposed technique finally reached a sensitivity of 0.95, specificity of 0.77, accuracy of 0.86 and precision of 0.81. In the last optimization step, the automatic system scored on average about 10.5% points lower KBD prevalences than the human assessor. However, a proposed change of scoring system (setting the limit for KBD at 0.5 cm deviation from the straight line) would lower this deviation. We conclude that the developed automatic scoring technique is a reliable and potentially valuable tool for the assessment of KBD.

Entities:  

Keywords:  animal welfare assessment; automated assessment; health indicators; keel bone damage; laying hen; laying hen health; precision livestock farming

Year:  2021        PMID: 33445636      PMCID: PMC7827378          DOI: 10.3390/ani11010163

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Animals (Basel)        ISSN: 2076-2615            Impact factor:   2.752


  20 in total

1.  Influence of different housing systems on prevalence of keel bone lesions in laying hens.

Authors:  Sónia Saraiva; Alexandra Esteves; George Stilwell
Journal:  Avian Pathol       Date:  2019-06-21       Impact factor: 3.378

2.  Keel bone fractures affect egg laying performance but not egg quality in laying hens housed in a commercial aviary system.

Authors:  Christina Rufener; Sarah Baur; Ariane Stratmann; Michael J Toscano
Journal:  Poult Sci       Date:  2019-04-01       Impact factor: 3.352

Review 3.  Methods for assessment of keel bone damage in poultry.

Authors:  T Casey-Trott; J L T Heerkens; M Petrik; P Regmi; L Schrader; M J Toscano; T Widowski
Journal:  Poult Sci       Date:  2015-08-17       Impact factor: 3.352

4.  Keel bone condition in laying hens: a histological evaluation of macroscopically assessed keel bones.

Authors:  Britta Scholz; Swaantje Rönchen; Henning Hamann; Marion Hewicker-Trautwein; Ottmar Distl
Journal:  Berl Munch Tierarztl Wochenschr       Date:  2008 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 0.328

5.  Behavioral Differences of Laying Hens with Fractured Keel Bones within Furnished Cages.

Authors:  Teresa M Casey-Trott; Tina M Widowski
Journal:  Front Vet Sci       Date:  2016-05-31

Review 6.  Technology and Poultry Welfare.

Authors:  Neila Ben Sassi; Xavier Averós; Inma Estevez
Journal:  Animals (Basel)       Date:  2016-10-11       Impact factor: 2.752

7.  Foot Pad Health as Part of On-Farm-Monitoring in Turkey Flocks.

Authors:  Kathrin Toppel; Birgit Spindler; Falko Kaufmann; Matthias Gauly; Nicole Kemper; Robby Andersson
Journal:  Front Vet Sci       Date:  2019-02-19

8.  The effect of keel fractures on egg production, feed and water consumption in individual laying hens.

Authors:  M A F Nasr; J Murrell; C J Nicol
Journal:  Br Poult Sci       Date:  2013       Impact factor: 2.095

Review 9.  Image Analysis and Computer Vision Applications in Animal Sciences: An Overview.

Authors:  Arthur Francisco Araújo Fernandes; João Ricardo Rebouças Dórea; Guilherme Jordão de Magalhães Rosa
Journal:  Front Vet Sci       Date:  2020-10-21
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.