Literature DB >> 33444797

Identifiability of tissue material parameters from uniaxial tests using multi-start optimization.

Babak N Safa1, Michael H Santare2, C Ross Ethier3, Dawn M Elliott4.   

Abstract

Determining tissue biomechanical material properties from mechanical test data is frequently required in a variety of applications. However, the validity of the resulting constitutive model parameters is the subject of debate in the field. Parameter optimization in tissue mechanics often comes down to the "identifiability" or "uniqueness" of constitutive model parameters; however, despite advances in formulating complex constitutive relations and many classic and creative curve-fitting approaches, there is currently no accessible framework to study the identifiability of tissue material parameters. Our objective was to assess the identifiability of material parameters for established constitutive models of fiber-reinforced soft tissues, biomaterials, and tissue-engineered constructs and establish a generalizable procedure for other applications. To do so, we generated synthetic experimental data by simulating uniaxial tension and compression tests, commonly used in biomechanics. We then fit this data using a multi-start optimization technique based on the nonlinear least-squares method with multiple initial parameter guesses. We considered tendon and sclera as example tissues, using constitutive models that describe these fiber-reinforced tissues. We demonstrated that not all the model parameters of these constitutive models were identifiable from uniaxial mechanical tests, despite achieving virtually identical fits to the stress-stretch response. We further show that when the lateral strain was considered as an additional fitting criterion, more parameters are identifiable, but some remain unidentified. This work provides a practical approach for addressing parameter identifiability in tissue mechanics.
Copyright © 2021. Published by Elsevier Ltd.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Identifiability; Optimization; Sclera; Stress mechanics; Tendon

Mesh:

Year:  2021        PMID: 33444797      PMCID: PMC8518191          DOI: 10.1016/j.actbio.2021.01.006

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Acta Biomater        ISSN: 1742-7061            Impact factor:   8.947


  33 in total

Review 1.  Multiaxial mechanical behavior of biological materials.

Authors:  Michael S Sacks; Wei Sun
Journal:  Annu Rev Biomed Eng       Date:  2003-04-18       Impact factor: 9.590

2.  Evaluation of Parallel Coordinates: Overview, Categorization and Guidelines for Future Research.

Authors:  Jimmy Johansson; Camilla Forsell
Journal:  IEEE Trans Vis Comput Graph       Date:  2016-01       Impact factor: 4.579

3.  A continuous method to compute model parameters for soft biological materials.

Authors:  Martin L Tanaka; Charles A Weisenbach; Mark Carl Miller; Laurel Kuxhaus
Journal:  J Biomech Eng       Date:  2011-07       Impact factor: 2.097

4.  Tissue-scale anisotropy and compressibility of tendon in semi-confined compression tests.

Authors:  Markus Böl; Alexander E Ehret; Kay Leichsenring; Michael Ernst
Journal:  J Biomech       Date:  2015-01-28       Impact factor: 2.712

5.  Model First and Ask Questions Later: Confessions of a Reformed Experimentalist.

Authors:  Jeffrey W Holmes
Journal:  J Biomech Eng       Date:  2019-04-08       Impact factor: 2.097

6.  A constrained von Mises distribution to describe fiber organization in thin soft tissues.

Authors:  Cecile L M Gouget; Michael J Girard; C Ross Ethier
Journal:  Biomech Model Mechanobiol       Date:  2011-07-08

7.  Image-based multiscale mechanical modeling shows the importance of structural heterogeneity in the human lumbar facet capsular ligament.

Authors:  Vahhab Zarei; Chao J Liu; Amy A Claeson; Taner Akkin; Victor H Barocas
Journal:  Biomech Model Mechanobiol       Date:  2017-03-30

8.  Time-dependent mechanical behavior of sheep digital tendons, including the effects of preconditioning.

Authors:  A Sverdlik; Y Lanir
Journal:  J Biomech Eng       Date:  2002-02       Impact factor: 2.097

9.  Evaluating Plastic Deformation and Damage as Potential Mechanisms for Tendon Inelasticity using a Reactive Modeling Framework.

Authors:  Babak Safa; Andrea Lee; Michael H Santare; Dawn M Elliott
Journal:  J Biomech Eng       Date:  2019-04-20       Impact factor: 2.097

10.  Modeling the matrix of articular cartilage using a continuous fiber angular distribution predicts many observed phenomena.

Authors:  Gerard A Ateshian; Vikram Rajan; Nadeen O Chahine; Clare E Canal; Clark T Hung
Journal:  J Biomech Eng       Date:  2009-06       Impact factor: 2.097

View more
  3 in total

1.  In vivo biomechanical assessment of iridial deformations and muscle contractions in human eyes.

Authors:  Babak N Safa; Mohammad Reza Bahrani Fard; C Ross Ethier
Journal:  J R Soc Interface       Date:  2022-07-06       Impact factor: 4.293

2.  TRPV4 and TRPC1 channels mediate the response to tensile strain in mouse Müller cells.

Authors:  Andrew O Jo; Monika Lakk; Christopher N Rudzitis; David Križaj
Journal:  Cell Calcium       Date:  2022-04-05       Impact factor: 4.690

3.  Assessment of the viscoelastic mechanical properties of the porcine optic nerve head using micromechanical testing and finite element modeling.

Authors:  Babak N Safa; A Thomas Read; C Ross Ethier
Journal:  Acta Biomater       Date:  2021-07-15       Impact factor: 10.633

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.