| Literature DB >> 33444471 |
Jurgen Schill1,2, Bas J H M Rosier1,2, Berta Gumí Audenis1,3, Eva Magdalena Estirado1,2, Tom F A de Greef1,2,4,5, Luc Brunsveld1,2.
Abstract
Biological processes rely on transient interactions that govern assembly of biomolecules into higher order, multi-component systems. A synthetic platform for the dynamic assembly of multicomponent complexes would provide novel entries to study and modulate the assembly of artificial systems into higher order topologies. Here, we establish a hybrid DNA origami-based approach as an assembly platform that enables dynamic templating of supramolecular architectures. It entails the site-selective recruitment of supramolecular polymers to the platform with preservation of the intrinsic dynamics and reversibility of the assembly process. The composition of the supramolecular assembly on the platform can be tuned dynamically, allowing for monomer rearrangement and inclusion of molecular cargo. This work should aid the study of supramolecular structures in their native environment in real-time and incites new strategies for controlled multicomponent self-assembly of synthetic building blocks.Entities:
Keywords: multicomponent assembly; polymers; self-assembly; supramolecular synthesis
Year: 2021 PMID: 33444471 PMCID: PMC8048573 DOI: 10.1002/anie.202016244
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Angew Chem Int Ed Engl ISSN: 1433-7851 Impact factor: 15.336
Figure 1General concept for the assembly of one‐dimensional supramolecular assemblies on a DNA origami platform. a) DNA‐functionalized and non‐functionalized monomeric building blocks co‐assemble into one‐dimensional supramolecular polymers in aqueous solution. A two‐dimensional 75×100‐nm2 DNA origami platform is programmed to include single‐stranded DNA handles at specific locations, enabling hybridization to the DNA‐functionalized monomers within these aggregates. The dynamic nature of the multicomponent assembly allows for the templated exchange of various monomer derivatives. An overview of the utilized mono‐functionalized monomers, including the molecular structure of the monomer's core, is provided in the dashed inset (for reactions schemes and DNA sequences, see Figure S1). b) The rectangular DNA origami structure was designed to incorporate 15 copies of DNA‐disc 2 through DNA hybridization of ODN (a′) and the single‐stranded handles (a) protruding from the surface, following the long side of the nanostructures as indicated by the blue circles in the top view. (For clarity only 6 handles are shown here; for details on the DNA origami design, see Figure S3). AFM analysis revealed successful incorporation of DNA‐disc 2 onto DNA nanostructures as indicated by spots of high intensity at the programmed positions.
Figure 2TEM analysis confirms supramolecular recruitment of gold nanoparticles (AuNPs) to DNA nanostructures. a) Schematic overview of both direct and supramolecular site‐selective recruitment of AuNPs to DNA nanostructures. DNA origami structures were designed to include 15 handles for DNA‐functionalized monomer assembly and two binding sites for AuNPs with three handles each (for design, see Figure S3). First, incubation of 4 nM DNA origami with 8 nM of DNA‐functionalized AuNPs and subsequent purification by gel extraction was performed to directly incorporate two AuNPs as visual markers. Then, a 0.3 μM pre‐annealed supramolecular polymer mixture consisting of 90 % inert disc 1, 5 % DNA‐disc 2, and 5 % DNA‐disc 3 was added to 0.5 nM purified DNA origami. Finally, 1 nM DNA‐functionalized AuNPs was added (See Figure S4). All incubation steps were performed for 1 h at 18 °C. TEM images of DNA origami nanostructures before functionalization (see Figure S5b), after direct incorporation of AuNPs at programmed positions (b), and after supramolecular recruitment of AuNPs (c). The expected size of a 75×100‐nm2 nanostructure is indicated in each image as a reference (dashed white rectangles). Scale bars, 100 nm.
Figure 3DNA‐guided recruitment and dynamic mixing of multicomponent supramolecular assemblies onto DNA nanostructures. a) Schematic overview of the assembly. DNA origami (4 nM) with 15 single‐stranded handles was incubated with a 1.6 μM mixture of 25 % DNA‐disc 2, and 75 % Cy3‐disc 4 (left) or 75 % Cy5‐disc 5 (right) building blocks for 1 h at 18 °C. Subsequently, 1.2 μM Cy5‐disc 5 (b) or Cy3‐disc 4 (c) was added and incubated for 1 h at 18 °C. The assembled complexes were subjected to gel electrophoresis in parallel on 1.5 % agarose gels without staining, to independently visualize the co‐migration of the supramolecular assemblies formed on the DNA origami and to observe FRET between the dye‐labeled monomers co‐assembled on the DNA origami platform. Images were obtained by illumination with UV light source (exc.) and emission through either a Cy3 (left, green) or Cy5 (middle, red) filter (em).
Figure 4Supramolecular recruitment of fluorescent monomers occurs site‐selectively. To demonstrate site‐selective incorporation of monomers onto the DNA platform using origami‐to‐monomer FRET, the DNA origami structures were adapted to include 15 Cy3 fluorophores positioned at either 6 nm (a) or 39 nm (b) from the 15 handles for DNA‐monomer incorporation. To pre‐assemble supramolecular polymers, 4 nM of each DNA origami variant was incubated with a 2.5 μM pre‐annealed supramolecular polymer mixture of inert disc 1 containing 5 % DNA‐disc 2 for 1 h at 18 °C. After incubation, 250 nM Cy5‐disc 5 was added directly to the reaction mixtures. Time‐resolved FRET measurements in the absence (gray curves) or presence (red curves) of 5 % DNA‐disc 2 revealed an increase in FRET when the Cy3 fluorophores are positioned at 6 nm from the DNA‐monomer incorporation sites, and no increase at 39‐nm spacing. Data is represented as mean ± s.d. of three independent experiments.