Literature DB >> 33444106

Making a First Impression: Exploring What Instructors Do and Say on the First Day of Introductory STEM Courses.

A Kelly Lane1, Clara L Meaders2, J Kenny Shuman3, MacKenzie R Stetzer4,5, Erin L Vinson5, Brian A Couch3, Michelle K Smith2, Marilyne Stains6.   

Abstract

Student impressions formed during the first day of class can impact course satisfaction and performance. Despite its potential importance, little is known about how instructors format the first day of class. Here, we report on observations of the first day of class in 23 introductory science, technology, engineering, and math (STEM) courses. We first described how introductory STEM instructors structure their class time by characterizing topics covered on the first day through inductive coding of class videos. We found that all instructors discussed policies and basic information. However, a cluster analysis revealed two groups of instructors who differed primarily in their level of STEM content coverage. We then coded the videos with the noncontent Instructor Talk framework, which organizes the statements instructors make unrelated to disciplinary content into several categories and subcategories. Instructors generally focused on building the instructor-student relationship and establishing classroom culture. Qualitative analysis indicated that instructors varied in the specificity of their noncontent statements and may have sent mixed messages by making negatively phrased statements with seemingly positive intentions. These results uncovered variation in instructor actions on the first day of class and can help instructors more effectively plan this day by providing messages that set students up for success.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2021        PMID: 33444106     DOI: 10.1187/cbe.20-05-0098

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  CBE Life Sci Educ        ISSN: 1931-7913            Impact factor:   3.325


  5 in total

1.  Am I getting through? Surveying students on what messages they recall from the first day of STEM classes.

Authors:  Clara L Meaders; Lillian G Senn; Brian A Couch; A Kelly Lane; Marilyne Stains; MacKenzie R Stetzer; Erin Vinson; Michelle K Smith
Journal:  Int J STEM Educ       Date:  2021-08-06

2.  Frequency, topic, and preferences: Tracking student engagement with several modalities of student-instructor contact in a first-year course.

Authors:  Bailey E Bingham; Victoria Rea; Lisa Robertson; M Alex Smith; Shoshanah Jacobs
Journal:  FEBS Open Bio       Date:  2021-10-31       Impact factor: 2.693

3.  Predicting implementation of active learning by tenure-track teaching faculty using robust cluster analysis.

Authors:  Austin L Zuckerman; Rebecca A Hardesty; Adriana Signorini; Andrea Aebersold; Mayank Verma; Kameryn Denaro; Petra Kranzfelder; Melinda T Owens; Brian Sato; Stanley M Lo
Journal:  Int J STEM Educ       Date:  2022-07-28

4.  Investigating Instructor Talk among Graduate Teaching Assistants in Undergraduate Biology Laboratory Classrooms.

Authors:  Katharine A Gelinas; Dax Ovid; Wilmer Amaya-Mejia; Rafael Ayala; Hanna E Baek; Eric Gasmin; Karina Hissen; Amanda Johnson; Emily Kossa; Lauren Levesque; Kurt R Lutz; Amichai S Lyons; Alan F Mata; Casey G Mitchell; Lisa Paggeot; Maria José Pastor-Infantas; Cheryl Patel; Susan Prestol-Casillas; Kevin Xu Chen; Kimberly D Tanner
Journal:  CBE Life Sci Educ       Date:  2022-06       Impact factor: 3.955

5.  Investigating Student Perceptions of Instructor Talk: Alignment with Researchers' Categorizations and Analysis of Remembered Language.

Authors:  Dax Ovid; Mallory M Rice; Joshua Vargas Luna; Karen Tabayoyong; Parinaz Lajevardi; Kimberly D Tanner
Journal:  CBE Life Sci Educ       Date:  2021-12       Impact factor: 3.325

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.