Arianna Heyer1, Rachel E Granberg1, Kristin L Rising2, Adam F Binder3, Alexzandra T Gentsch2, Nathan R Handley3. 1. Sidney Kimmel Medical College, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania. 2. Department of Emergency Medicine, Thomas Jefferson University Hospital, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania. 3. Sidney Kimmel Cancer Center, Department of Medical Oncology, Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania.
Abstract
Importance: Telehealth has emerged as a means of improving access and reducing cost for medical oncology care; however, use by specialists prior to the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic still remained low. Medical oncology professionals' perceptions of telehealth for cancer care are largely unknown, but are critical to telehealth utilization and expansion efforts. Objective: To identify medical oncology health professionals' perceptions of the barriers to and benefits of telehealth video visits. Design, Setting, and Participants: This qualitative study used interviews conducted from October 30, 2019, to March 5, 2020, of medical oncology health professionals at the Thomas Jefferson University Hospital, an urban academic health system in the US with a cancer center. All medical oncology physicians, physicians assistants, and nurse practitioners at the hospital were eligible to participate. A combination of volunteer and convenience sampling was used, resulting in the participation of 29 medical oncology health professionals, including 20 physicians and 9 advanced practice professionals, in semistructured interviews. Main Outcomes and Measures: Medical oncology health professionals' perceptions of barriers to and benefits of telehealth video visits as experienced by patients receiving cancer treatment. Results: Of the 29 participants, 15 (52%) were women and 22 (76%) were White, with a mean (SD) age of 48.5 (12.0) years. Respondents' perceptions were organized using the 4 domains of the National Quality Forum framework: clinical effectiveness, patient experience, access to care, and financial impact. Respondents disagreed on the clinical effectiveness and potential limitations of the virtual physical examination, as well as on the financial impact on patients. Respondents also largely recognized the convenience and improved access to care enabled by telehealth for patients. However, many reported concern regarding the health professional-patient relationship and their limited ability to comfort patients in a virtual setting. Conclusions and Relevance: Medical oncology health professionals shared conflicting opinions regarding the barriers to and benefits of telehealth in regard to clinical effectiveness, patient experience, access to care, and financial impact. Understanding oncologists' perceptions of telehealth elucidates potential barriers that need to be further investigated or improved for telehealth expansion and continued utilization; further research is ongoing to assess current perceptions of health professionals and patients given the rapid expansion of telehealth during the COVID-19 pandemic.
Importance: Telehealth has emerged as a means of improving access and reducing cost for medical oncology care; however, use by specialists prior to the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic still remained low. Medical oncology professionals' perceptions of telehealth for cancer care are largely unknown, but are critical to telehealth utilization and expansion efforts. Objective: To identify medical oncology health professionals' perceptions of the barriers to and benefits of telehealth video visits. Design, Setting, and Participants: This qualitative study used interviews conducted from October 30, 2019, to March 5, 2020, of medical oncology health professionals at the Thomas Jefferson University Hospital, an urban academic health system in the US with a cancer center. All medical oncology physicians, physicians assistants, and nurse practitioners at the hospital were eligible to participate. A combination of volunteer and convenience sampling was used, resulting in the participation of 29 medical oncology health professionals, including 20 physicians and 9 advanced practice professionals, in semistructured interviews. Main Outcomes and Measures: Medical oncology health professionals' perceptions of barriers to and benefits of telehealth video visits as experienced by patients receiving cancer treatment. Results: Of the 29 participants, 15 (52%) were women and 22 (76%) were White, with a mean (SD) age of 48.5 (12.0) years. Respondents' perceptions were organized using the 4 domains of the National Quality Forum framework: clinical effectiveness, patient experience, access to care, and financial impact. Respondents disagreed on the clinical effectiveness and potential limitations of the virtual physical examination, as well as on the financial impact on patients. Respondents also largely recognized the convenience and improved access to care enabled by telehealth for patients. However, many reported concern regarding the health professional-patient relationship and their limited ability to comfort patients in a virtual setting. Conclusions and Relevance: Medical oncology health professionals shared conflicting opinions regarding the barriers to and benefits of telehealth in regard to clinical effectiveness, patient experience, access to care, and financial impact. Understanding oncologists' perceptions of telehealth elucidates potential barriers that need to be further investigated or improved for telehealth expansion and continued utilization; further research is ongoing to assess current perceptions of health professionals and patients given the rapid expansion of telehealth during the COVID-19 pandemic.
Authors: Timothy Callaghan; Carly McCord; David Washburn; Kirby Goidel; Cason Schmit; Tasmiah Nuzhath; Abigail Spiegelman; Julia Scobee Journal: J Prim Care Community Health Date: 2022 Jan-Dec
Authors: Nathan R Handley; Arianna Heyer; Rachel E Granberg; Adam F Binder; Alexzandra T Gentsch; Valerie P Csik; Gregory Garber; Brooke Worster; Ana Maria Lopez; Kristin L Rising Journal: JCO Oncol Pract Date: 2021-10-22
Authors: Katherine Treiman; Elissa C Kranzler; Rebecca Moultrie; Laura Arena; Nicole Mack; Erica Fortune; Reese Garcia; Richard L Street Journal: J Patient Exp Date: 2022-04-21
Authors: Elad Neeman; Deepika Kumar; Liisa Lyon; Tatjana Kolevska; Mary Reed; Tilak Sundaresan; Amit Arora; Yan Li; Samantha Seaward; Gillian Kuehner; Sharon Likely; Julia Trosman; Christine Weldon; Raymond Liu Journal: JAMA Netw Open Date: 2021-11-01
Authors: Kea Turner; Margarita Bobonis Babilonia; Cristina Naso; Oliver Nguyen; Brian D Gonzalez; Laura B Oswald; Edmondo Robinson; Jennifer Elston Lafata; Robert J Ferguson; Amir Alishahi Tabriz; Krupal B Patel; Julie Hallanger-Johnson; Nasrin Aldawoodi; Young-Rock Hong; Heather S L Jim; Philippe E Spiess Journal: J Med Internet Res Date: 2022-01-19 Impact factor: 5.428