Literature DB >> 33443541

Effectiveness of Sequential Chemoradiation vs Concurrent Chemoradiation or Radiation Alone in Adjuvant Treatment After Hysterectomy for Cervical Cancer: The STARS Phase 3 Randomized Clinical Trial.

He Huang1, Yan-Ling Feng1, Ting Wan1, Yan-Na Zhang1, Xin-Ping Cao1, Yong-Wen Huang1, Ying Xiong1, Xin Huang1, Min Zheng1, Yan-Fang Li1, Jun-Dong Li1, Guan-Di Chen2, Hu Li3, Yi-Le Chen4, Li-Guo Ma5, Hong-Ying Yang6, Li Li7, Shu-Zhong Yao8, Wei-Jun Ye1, Hua Tu1, Qi-Dan Huang1, Li-Zhi Liang1, Fu-Yuan Liu1, Qing Liu1, Ji-Hong Liu1.   

Abstract

IMPORTANCE: There is no current consensus on the role of chemotherapy in addition to radiation for postoperative adjuvant treatment of patients with early-stage cervical cancer with adverse pathological factors.
OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the clinical benefits of sequential chemoradiation (SCRT) and concurrent chemoradiation (CCRT) compared with radiation alone (RT) as a postoperative adjuvant treatment in early-stage cervical cancer. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: After radical hysterectomy at 1 of 8 participating hospitals in China, patients with FIGO (International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics) stage IB to IIA cervical cancer with adverse pathological factors were randomized 1:1:1 to receive adjuvant RT, CCRT, or SCRT. Data were collected from February 2008 to December 2018.
INTERVENTIONS: Patients received adjuvant RT (total dose, 45-50 Gy), CCRT (weekly cisplatin, 30-40 mg/m2), or SCRT (cisplatin, 60-75 mg/m2, plus paclitaxel, 135-175 mg/m2) in a 21-day cycle, given 2 cycles before and 2 cycles after radiotherapy, respectively. MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES: The primary end point was the rate of disease-free survival (DFS) at 3 years.
RESULTS: A total of 1048 women (median [range] age, 48 [23-65] years) were included in the analysis (350 in the RT group, 345 in the CCRT group, and 353 in the SCRT group). Baseline demographic and disease characteristics were balanced among the treatment groups except that the rate of lymph node involvement was lowest in the RT group (18.3%). In the intention-to-treat population, SCRT was associated with a higher rate of DFS than RT (3-year rate, 90.0% vs 82.0%; hazard ratio [HR], 0.52; 95% CI, 0.35-0.76) and CCRT (90.0% vs 85.0%; HR, 0.65; 95% CI, 0.44-0.96). Treatment with SCRT also decreased cancer death risk compared with RT (5-year rate, 92.0% vs 88.0%; HR, 0.58; 95% CI, 0.35-0.95) after adjustment for lymph node involvement. However, neither DFS nor cancer death risk was different among patients treated with CCRT or RT. CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE: In this randomized clinical trial, conducted in a postoperative adjuvant treatment setting, SCRT, rather than CCRT, resulted in a higher DFS and lower risk of cancer death than RT among women with early-stage cervical cancer. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT00806117.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2021        PMID: 33443541      PMCID: PMC7809615          DOI: 10.1001/jamaoncol.2020.7168

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  JAMA Oncol        ISSN: 2374-2437            Impact factor:   31.777


  12 in total

Review 1.  Current Standards in the Management of Early and Locally Advanced Cervical Cancer: Update on the Benefit of Neoadjuvant/Adjuvant Strategies.

Authors:  Yuedan Zhou; Elie Rassy; Alexandre Coutte; Samir Achkar; Sophie Espenel; Catherine Genestie; Patricia Pautier; Philippe Morice; Sébastien Gouy; Cyrus Chargari
Journal:  Cancers (Basel)       Date:  2022-05-16       Impact factor: 6.575

Review 2.  Major clinical research advances in gynecologic cancer in 2020.

Authors:  Yoo Young Lee; Min Chul Choi; Jeong Yeol Park; Dong Hoon Suh; Jae Weon Kim
Journal:  J Gynecol Oncol       Date:  2021-07       Impact factor: 4.401

3.  Prognostic Significance of Clinicopathological Factors Influencing Overall Survival and Event-Free Survival of Patients with Cervical Cancer: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Authors:  Shengwei Kang; Junxiang Wu; Jie Li; Qing Hou; Bin Tang
Journal:  Med Sci Monit       Date:  2022-03-09

4.  Identification of COPA as a potential prognostic biomarker and pharmacological intervention target of cervical cancer by quantitative proteomics and experimental verification.

Authors:  Huiqiong Bao; Xiaobin Li; Zhixing Cao; Zhihong Huang; Li Chen; Mingbing Wang; Jiali Hu; Wenting Li; Hongwei Sun; Xue Jiang; Ping Mei; Huawen Li; Ligong Lu; Meixiao Zhan
Journal:  J Transl Med       Date:  2022-01-06       Impact factor: 5.531

5.  The Combination of T Stage and the Number of Pathologic Lymph Nodes Provides Better Prognostic Discrimination in Early-Stage Cervical Cancer With Lymph Node Involvement.

Authors:  Yongrui Bai; Ling Rong; Bin Hu; Xiumei Ma; Jiahui Wang; Haiyan Chen
Journal:  Front Oncol       Date:  2021-11-05       Impact factor: 6.244

6.  Dosimetric parameters and absolute monocyte count can predict the prognosis of acute hematologic toxicity in cervical cancer patients undergoing concurrent chemotherapy and volumetric-modulated arc therapy.

Authors:  Xiaoyong Xiang; Zhen Ding; Qi Zeng; Lingling Feng; Chunyan Qiu; Dongjie Chen; Jiawei Lu; Ning Li
Journal:  Radiat Oncol       Date:  2022-03-05       Impact factor: 3.481

7.  Survival impact of additional chemotherapy after adjuvant concurrent chemoradiation in patients with early cervical cancer who underwent radical hysterectomy.

Authors:  Se Ik Kim; Jeong Yun Kim; Chan Woo Wee; Maria Lee; Hee Seung Kim; Hyun Hoon Chung; Taek Sang Lee; Hye Won Jeon; Noh Hyun Park; Yong Sang Song; Tae Hun Kim
Journal:  BMC Cancer       Date:  2021-11-22       Impact factor: 4.430

Review 8.  Major clinical research advances in gynecologic cancer in 2021.

Authors:  Jeong-Yeol Park; Jung-Yun Lee; Yoo-Young Lee; Seung-Hyuk Shim; Dong Hoon Suh; Jae-Weon Kim
Journal:  J Gynecol Oncol       Date:  2022-03       Impact factor: 4.401

9.  Age-Dependent Hematologic Toxicity Profiles and Prognostic Serologic Markers in Postoperative Radiochemotherapy Treatment for Uterine Cervical Cancer.

Authors:  Eva Meixner; Line Hoeltgen; Philipp Hoegen; Laila König; Nathalie Arians; Laura L Michel; Katharina Smetanay; Carlo Fremd; Andreas Schneeweiss; Jürgen Debus; Juliane Hörner-Rieber
Journal:  Technol Cancer Res Treat       Date:  2022 Jan-Dec

10.  Comparison of Postoperative Adjuvant Chemotherapy and Concurrent Chemoradiotherapy for FIGO2018 Stage IIIC1 Cervical Cancer: A Retrospective Study.

Authors:  Masahiro Kagabu; Takayuki Nagasawa; Shunsuke Tatsuki; Yasuko Fukagawa; Hidetoshi Tomabechi; Eriko Takatori; Yoshitaka Kaido; Tadahiro Shoji; Tsukasa Baba
Journal:  Medicina (Kaunas)       Date:  2021-05-29       Impact factor: 2.430

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.