Literature DB >> 33443212

Efficient CRISPR-mediated base editing in Agrobacterium spp.

Savio D Rodrigues1, Mansour Karimi2,3, Lennert Impens2,3, Els Van Lerberge2,3, Griet Coussens2,3, Stijn Aesaert2,3, Debbie Rombaut2,3, Dominique Holtappels4, Heba M M Ibrahim1, Marc Van Montagu5,3,6, Jeroen Wagemans4, Thomas B Jacobs2,3, Barbara De Coninck7, Laurens Pauwels5,3.   

Abstract

Agrobacterium spp. are important plant pathogens that are the causative agents of crown gall or hairy root disease. Their unique infection strategy depends on the delivery of part of their DNA to plant cells. Thanks to this capacity, these phytopathogens became a powerful and indispensable tool for plant genetic engineering and agricultural biotechnology. Although Agrobacterium spp. are standard tools for plant molecular biologists, current laboratory strains have remained unchanged for decades and functional gene analysis of Agrobacterium has been hampered by time-consuming mutation strategies. Here, we developed clustered regularly interspaced short palindromic repeats (CRISPR)-mediated base editing to enable the efficient introduction of targeted point mutations into the genomes of both Agrobacterium tumefaciens and Agrobacterium rhizogenes As an example, we generated EHA105 strains with loss-of-function mutations in recA, which were fully functional for maize (Zea mays) transformation and confirmed the importance of RolB and RolC for hairy root development by A. rhizogenes K599. Our method is highly effective in 9 of 10 colonies after transformation, with edits in at least 80% of the cells. The genomes of EHA105 and K599 were resequenced, and genome-wide off-target analysis was applied to investigate the edited strains after curing of the base editor plasmid. The off-targets present were characteristic of Cas9-independent off-targeting and point to TC motifs as activity hotspots of the cytidine deaminase used. We anticipate that CRISPR-mediated base editing is the start of "engineering the engineer," leading to improved Agrobacterium strains for more efficient plant transformation and gene editing.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Agrobacterium; CRISPR; base editing; hairy root disease; plant transformation

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2020        PMID: 33443212      PMCID: PMC7812762          DOI: 10.1073/pnas.2013338118

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A        ISSN: 0027-8424            Impact factor:   11.205


  84 in total

1.  Biochemical Regulatory Features of Activation-Induced Cytidine Deaminase Remain Conserved from Lampreys to Humans.

Authors:  Emma M Quinlan; Justin J King; Chris T Amemiya; Ellen Hsu; Mani Larijani
Journal:  Mol Cell Biol       Date:  2017-09-26       Impact factor: 4.272

2.  Deaminase-mediated multiplex genome editing in Escherichia coli.

Authors:  Satomi Banno; Keiji Nishida; Takayuki Arazoe; Hitoshi Mitsunobu; Akihiko Kondo
Journal:  Nat Microbiol       Date:  2018-02-05       Impact factor: 17.745

3.  New plant breeding technologies for food security.

Authors:  Syed Shan-E-Ali Zaidi; Hervé Vanderschuren; Matin Qaim; Magdy M Mahfouz; Ajay Kohli; Shahid Mansoor; Mark Tester
Journal:  Science       Date:  2019-03-29       Impact factor: 47.728

4.  Construction of an Agrobacterium tumefaciens C58 recA mutant.

Authors:  S K Farrand; S P O'Morchoe; J McCutchan
Journal:  J Bacteriol       Date:  1989-10       Impact factor: 3.490

5.  Crown gall oncogenesis: evidence that a T-DNA gene from the Agrobacterium Ti plasmid pTiA6 encodes an enzyme that catalyzes synthesis of indoleacetic acid.

Authors:  L S Thomashow; S Reeves; M F Thomashow
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1984-08       Impact factor: 11.205

6.  virA and virG control the plant-induced activation of the T-DNA transfer process of A. tumefaciens.

Authors:  S E Stachel; P C Zambryski
Journal:  Cell       Date:  1986-08-01       Impact factor: 41.582

7.  MACBETH: Multiplex automated Corynebacterium glutamicum base editing method.

Authors:  Yu Wang; Ye Liu; Jiao Liu; Yanmei Guo; Liwen Fan; Xiaomeng Ni; Xiaomei Zheng; Meng Wang; Ping Zheng; Jibin Sun; Yanhe Ma
Journal:  Metab Eng       Date:  2018-03-24       Impact factor: 9.783

8.  Coexpression of octopine and succinamopine Agrobacterium virulence genes to generate high quality transgenic events in maize by reducing vector backbone integration.

Authors:  Nagesh Sardesai; Stephen Foulk; Wei Chen; Huixia Wu; Emily Etchison; Manju Gupta
Journal:  Transgenic Res       Date:  2018-10-06       Impact factor: 2.788

9.  Bacterial transposons are co-transferred with T-DNA to rice chromosomes during Agrobacterium-mediated transformation.

Authors:  Sung-Ryul Kim; Gynheung An
Journal:  Mol Cells       Date:  2012-05-07       Impact factor: 5.034

10.  Highly efficient base editing in bacteria using a Cas9-cytidine deaminase fusion.

Authors:  Ke Zheng; Yang Wang; Na Li; Fang-Fang Jiang; Chang-Xian Wu; Fang Liu; Huan-Chun Chen; Zheng-Fei Liu
Journal:  Commun Biol       Date:  2018-04-19
View more
  10 in total

Review 1.  Reprogramming Microbial CO2-Metabolizing Chassis With CRISPR-Cas Systems.

Authors:  Hai-Yan Yu; Shu-Guang Wang; Peng-Fei Xia
Journal:  Front Bioeng Biotechnol       Date:  2022-06-23

Review 2.  CRISPR-Mediated Base Editing: From Precise Point Mutation to Genome-Wide Engineering in Nonmodel Microbes.

Authors:  Mengyuan Li; Yi-Xin Huo; Shuyuan Guo
Journal:  Biology (Basel)       Date:  2022-04-09

3.  Development and application of a fast and efficient CRISPR-based genetic toolkit in Bacillus amyloliquefaciens LB1ba02.

Authors:  Qinglong Xin; Yudan Chen; Qianlin Chen; Bin Wang; Li Pan
Journal:  Microb Cell Fact       Date:  2022-05-28       Impact factor: 6.352

Review 4.  Hairy CRISPR: Genome Editing in Plants Using Hairy Root Transformation.

Authors:  Alexey S Kiryushkin; Elena L Ilina; Elizaveta D Guseva; Katharina Pawlowski; Kirill N Demchenko
Journal:  Plants (Basel)       Date:  2021-12-24

5.  In Vivo Rapid Investigation of CRISPR-Based Base Editing Components in Escherichia coli (IRI-CCE): A Platform for Evaluating Base Editing Tools and Their Components.

Authors:  Rahul Mahadev Shelake; Dibyajyoti Pramanik; Jae-Yean Kim
Journal:  Int J Mol Sci       Date:  2022-01-20       Impact factor: 5.923

6.  Optimized Transformation and Gene Editing of the B104 Public Maize Inbred by Improved Tissue Culture and Use of Morphogenic Regulators.

Authors:  Stijn Aesaert; Lennert Impens; Griet Coussens; Els Van Lerberge; Rudy Vanderhaeghen; Laurence Desmet; Yasmine Vanhevel; Shari Bossuyt; Angeline Ndele Wambua; Mieke Van Lijsebettens; Dirk Inzé; Ellen De Keyser; Thomas B Jacobs; Mansour Karimi; Laurens Pauwels
Journal:  Front Plant Sci       Date:  2022-04-22       Impact factor: 6.627

7.  A DNA-Free Editing Platform for Genetic Screens in Soybean via CRISPR/Cas9 Ribonucleoprotein Delivery.

Authors:  Saminathan Subburaj; Caroline Bedin Zanatta; Jennifer A L Nunn; Aline Martins Hoepers; Rubens Onofre Nodari; Sarah Zanon Agapito-Tenfen
Journal:  Front Plant Sci       Date:  2022-07-12       Impact factor: 6.627

8.  Genome Editing of Veterinary Relevant Mycoplasmas Using a CRISPR-Cas Base Editor System.

Authors:  Thomas Ipoutcha; Fabien Rideau; Geraldine Gourgues; Yonathan Arfi; Carole Lartigue; Alain Blanchard; Pascal Sirand-Pugnet
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2022-08-24       Impact factor: 5.005

9.  CRISPR RNA-guided integrase enables high-efficiency targeted genome engineering in Agrobacterium tumefaciens.

Authors:  Ephraim Aliu; Keunsub Lee; Kan Wang
Journal:  Plant Biotechnol J       Date:  2022-07-11       Impact factor: 13.263

10.  Highly Efficient CRISPR-Mediated Base Editing in Sinorhizobium meliloti.

Authors:  Longxiang Wang; Yuan Xiao; Xiaowei Wei; Jimin Pan; Deqiang Duanmu
Journal:  Front Microbiol       Date:  2021-06-18       Impact factor: 5.640

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.