Literature DB >> 33443077

Manipulating Pharmacodynamic Efficacy with Agonist + Antagonist Mixtures: In Vitro and In Vivo Studies with Opioids and Cannabinoids.

D E Selley1, M L Banks1, C M Diester1, A M Jali1, L P Legakis1, E J Santos1, S S Negus2.   

Abstract

Pharmacodynamic efficacy of drugs to activate their receptors is a key determinant of drug effects, and intermediate-efficacy agonists are often useful clinically because they retain sufficient efficacy to produce therapeutically desirable effects while minimizing undesirable effects. Molecular mechanisms of efficacy are not well understood, so rational drug design to control efficacy is not yet possible; however, receptor theory predicts that fixed-proportion mixtures of an agonist and antagonist for a given receptor can be adjusted to precisely control net efficacy of the mixture in activating that receptor. Moreover, the agonist proportion required to produce different effects provides a quantitative scale for comparing efficacy requirements across those effects. To test this hypothesis, the present study evaluated effectiveness of fixed-proportion agonist/antagonist mixtures to produce in vitro and in vivo effects mediated by μ-opioid receptors (MOR) and cannabinoid type 1 receptors (CB1R). Mixtures of 1) the MOR agonist fentanyl and antagonist naltrexone and 2) the CB1R agonist CP55,940 and antagonist/inverse agonist rimonabant were evaluated in an in vitro assay of ligand-stimulated guanosine 5'-O-(3-[35S]thio)triphosphate binding and an in vivo assay of thermal nociception in mice. For both agonist/antagonist pairs in both assays, increasing agonist proportions produced graded increases in maximal mixture effects, and lower agonist proportions were sufficient to produce in vivo than in vitro effects. These findings support the utility of agonist-antagonist mixtures as a strategy to control net efficacy of receptor activation and to quantify and compare efficacy requirements across a range of in vitro and in vivo endpoints. SIGNIFICANCE STATEMENT: Manipulation of agonist proportion in agonist/antagonist mixtures governs net mixture efficacy at the target receptor. Parameters of agonist/antagonist mixture effects can provide a quantitative metric for comparison of efficacy requirements across a wide range of conditions.
Copyright © 2021 by The American Society for Pharmacology and Experimental Therapeutics.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2020        PMID: 33443077      PMCID: PMC7919866          DOI: 10.1124/jpet.120.000349

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Pharmacol Exp Ther        ISSN: 0022-3565            Impact factor:   4.030


  28 in total

1.  Some implications of receptor theory for in vivo assessment of agonists, antagonists and inverse agonists.

Authors:  S Stevens Negus
Journal:  Biochem Pharmacol       Date:  2006-02-07       Impact factor: 5.858

Review 2.  Opioid receptor-coupled second messenger systems.

Authors:  S R Childers
Journal:  Life Sci       Date:  1991       Impact factor: 5.037

3.  SR141716A is an inverse agonist at the human cannabinoid CB1 receptor.

Authors:  R S Landsman; T H Burkey; P Consroe; W R Roeske; H I Yamamura
Journal:  Eur J Pharmacol       Date:  1997-09-03       Impact factor: 4.432

4.  Signal transduction correlates of mu opioid agonist intrinsic efficacy: receptor-stimulated [35S]GTP gamma S binding in mMOR-CHO cells and rat thalamus.

Authors:  D E Selley; Q Liu; S R Childers
Journal:  J Pharmacol Exp Ther       Date:  1998-05       Impact factor: 4.030

5.  mu-Opioid receptor-stimulated guanosine-5'-O-(gamma-thio)-triphosphate binding in rat thalamus and cultured cell lines: signal transduction mechanisms underlying agonist efficacy.

Authors:  D E Selley; L J Sim; R Xiao; Q Liu; S R Childers
Journal:  Mol Pharmacol       Date:  1997-01       Impact factor: 4.436

6.  The clinical analgesic efficacy of buprenorphine.

Authors:  R B Raffa; M Haidery; H-M Huang; K Kalladeen; D E Lockstein; H Ono; M J Shope; O A Sowunmi; J K Tran; J V Pergolizzi
Journal:  J Clin Pharm Ther       Date:  2014-07-29       Impact factor: 2.512

7.  Propagation of conformational changes during μ-opioid receptor activation.

Authors:  Rémy Sounier; Camille Mas; Jan Steyaert; Toon Laeremans; Aashish Manglik; Weijiao Huang; Brian K Kobilka; Héléne Déméné; Sébastien Granier
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2015-08-05       Impact factor: 49.962

8.  Effectiveness comparisons of G-protein biased and unbiased mu opioid receptor ligands in warm water tail-withdrawal and drug discrimination in male and female rats.

Authors:  Kathryn L Schwienteck; Kaycee E Faunce; Kenner C Rice; Samuel Obeng; Yan Zhang; Bruce E Blough; Travis W Grim; S Stevens Negus; Matthew L Banks
Journal:  Neuropharmacology       Date:  2019-01-18       Impact factor: 5.250

Review 9.  Current status of opioid addiction treatment and related preclinical research.

Authors:  M J Kreek; B Reed; E R Butelman
Journal:  Sci Adv       Date:  2019-10-02       Impact factor: 14.136

View more
  3 in total

1.  Role of Efficacy as a Determinant of Locomotor Activation by Mu Opioid Receptor Ligands in Female and Male Mice.

Authors:  Edna J Santos; Matthew L Banks; S Stevens Negus
Journal:  J Pharmacol Exp Ther       Date:  2022-04-30       Impact factor: 4.402

2.  Some effects of putative G-protein biased mu-opioid receptor agonists in male rhesus monkeys.

Authors:  Jeremy C Cornelissen; Bruce E Blough; Laura M Bohn; S Stevens Negus; Matthew L Banks
Journal:  Behav Pharmacol       Date:  2021-08-01       Impact factor: 2.277

3.  A Journey through Diastereomeric Space: The Design, Synthesis, In Vitro and In Vivo Pharmacological Activity, and Molecular Modeling of Novel Potent Diastereomeric MOR Agonists and Antagonists.

Authors:  Dana R Chambers; Agnieszka Sulima; Dan Luo; Thomas E Prisinzano; Alexander Goldberg; Bing Xie; Lei Shi; Carol A Paronis; Jack Bergman; Nima Nassehi; Dana E Selley; Gregory H Imler; Arthur E Jacobson; Kenner C Rice
Journal:  Molecules       Date:  2022-09-30       Impact factor: 4.927

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.