Literature DB >> 33442582

Predicting Subjective Recovery from Lower Limb Surgery Using Consumer Wearables.

Marta Karas1,2, Nikki Marinsek1, Jörg Goldhahn3, Luca Foschini1, Ernesto Ramirez1, Ieuan Clay1.   

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: A major challenge in the monitoring of rehabilitation is the lack of long-term individual baseline data which would enable accurate and objective assessment of functional recovery. Consumer-grade wearable devices enable the tracking of individual everyday functioning prior to illness or other medical events which necessitate the monitoring of recovery trajectories.
METHODS: For 1,324 individuals who underwent surgery on a lower limb, we collected their Fitbit device data of steps, heart rate, and sleep from 26 weeks before to 26 weeks after the self-reported surgery date. We identified subgroups of individuals who self-reported surgeries for bone fracture repair (n = 355), tendon or ligament repair/reconstruction (n = 773), and knee or hip joint replacement (n = 196). We used linear mixed models to estimate the average effect of time relative to surgery on daily activity measurements while adjusting for gender, age, and the participant-specific activity baseline. We used a sub-cohort of 127 individuals with dense wearable data who underwent tendon/ligament surgery and employed XGBoost to predict the self-reported recovery time.
RESULTS: The 1,324 study individuals were all US residents, predominantly female (84%), white or Caucasian (85%), and young to middle-aged (mean age 36.2 years). We showed that 12 weeks pre- and 26 weeks post-surgery trajectories of daily behavioral measurements (steps sum, heart rate, sleep efficiency score) can capture activity changes relative to an individual's baseline. We demonstrated that the trajectories differ across surgery types, recapitulate the documented effect of age on functional recovery, and highlight differences in relative activity change across self-reported recovery time groups. Finally, using a sub-cohort of 127 individuals, we showed that long-term recovery can be accurately predicted, on an individual level, only 1 month after surgery (AUROC 0.734, AUPRC 0.8). Furthermore, we showed that predictions are most accurate when long-term, individual baseline data are available. DISCUSSION: Leveraging long-term, passively collected wearable data promises to enable relative assessment of individual recovery and is a first step towards data-driven intervention for individuals.
Copyright © 2020 by S. Karger AG, Basel.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Activity monitors; Conventional wearable devices; Influence and/or predict health-related outcomes; Person-generated health data; Quantifiable physiological and behavioral data

Year:  2020        PMID: 33442582      PMCID: PMC7768104          DOI: 10.1159/000511531

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Digit Biomark        ISSN: 2504-110X


  30 in total

1.  Postoperative recovery of accelerometer-based physical activity in older cancer patients.

Authors:  Leonie T Jonker; Sharon Hendriks; Maarten Mh Lahr; Barbara C van Munster; Geertruida H de Bock; Barbara L van Leeuwen
Journal:  Eur J Surg Oncol       Date:  2020-06-24       Impact factor: 4.424

Review 2.  Digital Medicine: A Primer on Measurement.

Authors:  Andrea Coravos; Jennifer C Goldsack; Daniel R Karlin; Camille Nebeker; Eric Perakslis; Noah Zimmerman; M Kelley Erb
Journal:  Digit Biomark       Date:  2019-05-09

3.  Total hip and total knee arthroplasties: trends and disparities revisited.

Authors:  Heejung Bang; Ya-lin Chiu; Stavros G Memtsoudis; Lisa A Mandl; Alejandro González Della Valle; Alvin I Mushlin; Robert G Marx; Madhu Mazumdar
Journal:  Am J Orthop (Belle Mead NJ)       Date:  2010-09

4.  Influence of age on the outcome of rehabilitation after total hip replacement.

Authors:  Joanna Dolata; Krzysztof Pietrzak; Wojciech Manikowski; Jacek Kaczmarczyk; Ewa Gajewska; Wiesław Kaczmarek
Journal:  Pol Orthop Traumatol       Date:  2013-05-09

5.  Can Machine-learning Algorithms Predict Early Revision TKA in the Danish Knee Arthroplasty Registry?

Authors:  Anders El-Galaly; Clare Grazal; Andreas Kappel; Poul Torben Nielsen; Steen Lund Jensen; Jonathan A Forsberg
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2020-09       Impact factor: 4.755

Review 6.  Improve postoperative sleep: what can we do?

Authors:  Xian Su; Dong-Xin Wang
Journal:  Curr Opin Anaesthesiol       Date:  2018-02       Impact factor: 2.706

Review 7.  Best practices in scaling digital health in low and middle income countries.

Authors:  Alain B Labrique; Christina Wadhwani; Koku Awoonor Williams; Peter Lamptey; Cees Hesp; Rowena Luk; Ann Aerts
Journal:  Global Health       Date:  2018-11-03       Impact factor: 4.185

8.  Current State of Digital Biomarker Technologies for Real-Life, Home-Based Monitoring of Cognitive Function for Mild Cognitive Impairment to Mild Alzheimer Disease and Implications for Clinical Care: Systematic Review.

Authors:  Antoine Piau; Katherine Wild; Nora Mattek; Jeffrey Kaye
Journal:  J Med Internet Res       Date:  2019-08-30       Impact factor: 5.428

9.  Calibration: the Achilles heel of predictive analytics.

Authors:  Ben Van Calster; David J McLernon; Maarten van Smeden; Laure Wynants; Ewout W Steyerberg
Journal:  BMC Med       Date:  2019-12-16       Impact factor: 8.775

Review 10.  Verification, analytical validation, and clinical validation (V3): the foundation of determining fit-for-purpose for Biometric Monitoring Technologies (BioMeTs).

Authors:  Jennifer C Goldsack; Andrea Coravos; Jessie P Bakker; Brinnae Bent; Ariel V Dowling; Cheryl Fitzer-Attas; Alan Godfrey; Job G Godino; Ninad Gujar; Elena Izmailova; Christine Manta; Barry Peterson; Benjamin Vandendriessche; William A Wood; Ke Will Wang; Jessilyn Dunn
Journal:  NPJ Digit Med       Date:  2020-04-14
View more
  4 in total

1.  The Future of Digital Health: Meeting Report.

Authors:  Priya Kumar; Ieuan Clay
Journal:  Digit Biomark       Date:  2021-04-16

2.  Measuring Health-Related Quality of Life With Multimodal Data: Viewpoint.

Authors:  Ieuan Clay; Francesca Cormack; Szymon Fedor; Luca Foschini; Giovanni Gentile; Chris van Hoof; Priya Kumar; Florian Lipsmeier; Akane Sano; Benjamin Smarr; Benjamin Vandendriessche; Valeria De Luca
Journal:  J Med Internet Res       Date:  2022-05-26       Impact factor: 7.076

Review 3.  Evaluation, Acceptance, and Qualification of Digital Measures: From Proof of Concept to Endpoint.

Authors:  Jennifer C Goldsack; Ariel V Dowling; David Samuelson; Bray Patrick-Lake; Ieuan Clay
Journal:  Digit Biomark       Date:  2021-03-23

4.  Predicting Changes in Depression Severity Using the PSYCHE-D (Prediction of Severity Change-Depression) Model Involving Person-Generated Health Data: Longitudinal Case-Control Observational Study.

Authors:  Mariko Makhmutova; Raghu Kainkaryam; Marta Ferreira; Jae Min; Martin Jaggi; Ieuan Clay
Journal:  JMIR Mhealth Uhealth       Date:  2022-03-25       Impact factor: 4.947

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.