Literature DB >> 33442581

Assessment of Fatigue Using Wearable Sensors: A Pilot Study.

Hongyu Luo1, Pierre-Alexandre Lee1, Ieuan Clay2, Martin Jaggi3, Valeria De Luca1.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Fatigue is a broad, multifactorial concept encompassing feelings of reduced physical and mental energy levels. Fatigue strongly impacts patient health-related quality of life across a huge range of conditions, yet, to date, tools available to understand fatigue are severely limited.
METHODS: After using a recurrent neural network-based algorithm to impute missing time series data form a multisensor wearable device, we compared supervised and unsupervised machine learning approaches to gain insights on the relationship between self-reported non-pathological fatigue and multimodal sensor data.
RESULTS: A total of 27 healthy subjects and 405 recording days were analyzed. Recorded data included continuous multimodal wearable sensor time series on physical activity, vital signs, and other physiological parameters, and daily questionnaires on fatigue. The best results were obtained when using the causal convolutional neural network model for unsupervised representation learning of multivariate sensor data, and random forest as a classifier trained on subject-reported physical fatigue labels (weighted precision of 0.70 ± 0.03 and recall of 0.73 ± 0.03). When using manually engineered features on sensor data to train our random forest (weighted precision of 0.70 ± 0.05 and recall of 0.72 ± 0.01), both physical activity (energy expenditure, activity counts, and steps) and vital signs (heart rate, heart rate variability, and respiratory rate) were important parameters to measure. Furthermore, vital signs contributed the most as top features for predicting mental fatigue compared to physical ones. These results support the idea that fatigue is a highly multimodal concept. Analysis of clusters from sensor data highlighted a digital phenotype indicating the presence of fatigue (95% of observations) characterized by a high intensity of physical activity. Mental fatigue followed similar trends but was less predictable. Potential future directions could focus on anomaly detection assuming longer individual monitoring periods.
CONCLUSION: Taken together, these results are the first demonstration that multimodal digital data can be used to inform, quantify, and augment subjectively captured non-pathological fatigue measures.
Copyright © 2020 by S. Karger AG, Basel.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Deep learning; Digital measurements; Fatigue; Machine learning; Wearable sensors

Year:  2020        PMID: 33442581      PMCID: PMC7768149          DOI: 10.1159/000512166

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Digit Biomark        ISSN: 2504-110X


  38 in total

1.  Do subjective symptoms predict our perception of jet-lag?

Authors:  J Waterhouse; B Edwards; A Nevill; G Atkinson; T Reilly; P Davies; R Godfrey
Journal:  Ergonomics       Date:  2000-10       Impact factor: 2.778

2.  Psychometric qualities of a brief self-rated fatigue measure: The Fatigue Assessment Scale.

Authors:  Helen J Michielsen; Jolanda De Vries; Guus L Van Heck
Journal:  J Psychosom Res       Date:  2003-04       Impact factor: 3.006

3.  Paper and electronic diaries: Too early for conclusions on compliance rates and their effects--Comment on Green, Rafaeli, Bolger, Shrout, and Reis (2006).

Authors:  Joan E Broderick; Arthur A Stone
Journal:  Psychol Methods       Date:  2006-03

Review 4.  Fatigue in healthy and diseased individuals.

Authors:  Josef Finsterer; Sinda Zarrouk Mahjoub
Journal:  Am J Hosp Palliat Care       Date:  2013-07-26       Impact factor: 2.500

5.  Continuous Monitoring of Patient Mobility for 18 Months Using Inertial Sensors following Traumatic Knee Injury: A Case Study.

Authors:  Arne Mueller; Holger Hoefling; Timur Nuritdinow; Nicholas Holway; Matthias Schieker; Martin Daumer; Ieuan Clay
Journal:  Digit Biomark       Date:  2018-08-02

6.  Prediction of Happy-Sad mood from daily behaviors and previous sleep history.

Authors:  Akane Sano; Amy Z Yu; Andrew W McHill; Andrew J K Phillips; Sara Taylor; Natasha Jaques; Elizabeth B Klerman; Rosalind W Picard
Journal:  Conf Proc IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc       Date:  2015

Review 7.  Fatigue in neurological disorders.

Authors:  Abhijit Chaudhuri; Peter O Behan
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  2004-03-20       Impact factor: 79.321

8.  Measurement and control of bias in patient reported outcomes using multidimensional item response theory.

Authors:  N Maritza Dowling; Daniel M Bolt; Sien Deng; Chenxi Li
Journal:  BMC Med Res Methodol       Date:  2016-05-26       Impact factor: 4.615

9.  Monitoring Fatigue Status with HRV Measures in Elite Athletes: An Avenue Beyond RMSSD?

Authors:  Laurent Schmitt; Jacques Regnard; Grégoire P Millet
Journal:  Front Physiol       Date:  2015-11-19       Impact factor: 4.566

10.  Multivariate Radiological-Based Models for the Prediction of Future Knee Pain: Data from the OAI.

Authors:  Jorge I Galván-Tejada; José M Celaya-Padilla; Victor Treviño; José G Tamez-Peña
Journal:  Comput Math Methods Med       Date:  2015-10-04       Impact factor: 2.238

View more
  9 in total

1.  The Future of Digital Health: Meeting Report.

Authors:  Priya Kumar; Ieuan Clay
Journal:  Digit Biomark       Date:  2021-04-16

Review 2.  Emerging Artificial Intelligence-Empowered mHealth: Scoping Review.

Authors:  Paras Bhatt; Jia Liu; Yanmin Gong; Jing Wang; Yuanxiong Guo
Journal:  JMIR Mhealth Uhealth       Date:  2022-06-09       Impact factor: 4.947

3.  Measuring Health-Related Quality of Life With Multimodal Data: Viewpoint.

Authors:  Ieuan Clay; Francesca Cormack; Szymon Fedor; Luca Foschini; Giovanni Gentile; Chris van Hoof; Priya Kumar; Florian Lipsmeier; Akane Sano; Benjamin Smarr; Benjamin Vandendriessche; Valeria De Luca
Journal:  J Med Internet Res       Date:  2022-05-26       Impact factor: 7.076

Review 4.  Opportunities for Smartphone Sensing in E-Health Research: A Narrative Review.

Authors:  Pranav Kulkarni; Reuben Kirkham; Roisin McNaney
Journal:  Sensors (Basel)       Date:  2022-05-20       Impact factor: 3.847

Review 5.  Evaluation, Acceptance, and Qualification of Digital Measures: From Proof of Concept to Endpoint.

Authors:  Jennifer C Goldsack; Ariel V Dowling; David Samuelson; Bray Patrick-Lake; Ieuan Clay
Journal:  Digit Biomark       Date:  2021-03-23

6.  An alternative approach to determination of Covid-19 personal risk index by using fuzzy logic.

Authors:  Hakan Şimşek; Elifnaz Yangın
Journal:  Health Technol (Berl)       Date:  2022-01-27

7.  Evaluation of a Fast Test Based on Biometric Signals to Assess Mental Fatigue at the Workplace-A Pilot Study.

Authors:  Mauricio A Ramírez-Moreno; Patricio Carrillo-Tijerina; Milton Osiel Candela-Leal; Myriam Alanis-Espinosa; Juan Carlos Tudón-Martínez; Armando Roman-Flores; Ricardo A Ramírez-Mendoza; Jorge de J Lozoya-Santos
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2021-11-12       Impact factor: 3.390

8.  The Role of Unobtrusive Home-Based Continuous Sensing in the Management of Postacute Sequelae of SARS CoV-2.

Authors:  Benjamin Harris Peterson Corman; Sritha Rajupet; Fan Ye; Elinor Randi Schoenfeld
Journal:  J Med Internet Res       Date:  2022-01-26       Impact factor: 5.428

9.  Predicting Changes in Depression Severity Using the PSYCHE-D (Prediction of Severity Change-Depression) Model Involving Person-Generated Health Data: Longitudinal Case-Control Observational Study.

Authors:  Mariko Makhmutova; Raghu Kainkaryam; Marta Ferreira; Jae Min; Martin Jaggi; Ieuan Clay
Journal:  JMIR Mhealth Uhealth       Date:  2022-03-25       Impact factor: 4.947

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.