| Literature DB >> 33442548 |
Safendra Siregar1, Bambang Sasongko Noegroho1, Ricky Adriansjah1, Akhmad Mustafa1, Zola Wijayanti1.
Abstract
INTRODUCTION: Testicular torsion is a sudden rotation of the testis towards its axis, which causes the twisting of the spermatic cord. Post-detorsion reperfusion will cause inflammation and trigger oxidative stress, which generates reactive oxygen species (ROS). Malondialdehyde (MDA) is an organic compound formed from ROS frequently used as an oxidative stress biomarker during ischemia and ischemia-reperfusion injury. In some organs, stem cell administration on the damaged organ is essential in preventing cellular damage and death. This study aimed to learn about the effect of hADSC administration on an ischemia-reperfusion injury.Entities:
Keywords: human adipose-derived stem cell; malondialdehyde; MDA; testicular torsion
Year: 2021 PMID: 33442548 PMCID: PMC7797314 DOI: 10.2147/RRU.S283861
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Res Rep Urol ISSN: 2253-2447
Figure 1Research flow of the study.
Figure 2Testicular torsion model was simulated by twisting the left testicle for 720° counterclockwise (A), Intratesticular human ADSC injection (1x106 cells in 1000µL PBL solution) into the rete testis (1cc) (B).
Figure 3MDA expression level, 1st week and 4th week of observation.
Comparison of MDA Concentration
| Negative Control Mean (ng/mL) | Group I (Torsion/Detorsion) Mean (ng/mL) | Group II (T/D+Treatment Group) Mean (ng/mL) | F | Sig | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 week | 1.6996 ± 0.008 | 1.7129 ± 0.0058 | 1.7003 ± 0.0057 | 23.343 | 0.000 |
| 4 week | 1.6996 ± 0.008 | 1.7004 ± 0.0039 | 1.6807 ± 0.0038 | 6.412 | 0.016 |
Post Hoc Analysis for MDA Concentration
| Week | Group | Mean Difference | Sig. | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1st | I | Negative Control | 0.0133 | 0.039 |
| II | 0.0126 | 0.025 | ||
| II | Negative Control | 0.0073 | 0.986 | |
| I | −0.0126 | 0.025 | ||
| 4th | I | Negative Control | 0.0008 | 0.001 |
| II | 0.0197 | 0.000 | ||
| I | −0.0197 | 0.000 | ||
Note: *There was no difference on MDA concentration between group II and negative control group.
Figure 4Johnsen score comparison between groups during 1st and 4th week.
Comparison of Johnsen Score Examination
| Observation | Negative Control Johnsen Score | Group I (Torsion/Detorsion) Johnsen Score | Group II (T/D+Treatment Group) Johnsen Score | F | Sig |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1st week | 9.47 ± 0.092 | 3.82 ± 0.753 | 4.22 ± 0.921 | 39.578 | 0.000 |
| 4th week | 9.47 ± 0.092 | 4.932 ± 0.823 | 7.365 ± 1.709 | 9.531 | 0.016 |
Post Hoc Analysis Johnsen Score
| Week | Group | Mean Difference | Sig. | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | I | Negative Control | −5.65 | 0.000 |
| II | −0.45 | 0.703 | ||
| II | Negative Control | −5.2 | 0.000 | |
| I | 0.45 | 0.703 | ||
| 4 | I | Negative Control | −4.53 | 0.010 |
| II | −2.43 | 0.044 | ||
| I | 2.43 | 0.044 | ||
Note: *There was no difference on Johnsen Score between group II and negative control group.
Figure 5Histopatological comparison between group I and II.