| Literature DB >> 33442434 |
Rieko Nakao1, Akiko Nitta2, Megumi Yumiba3, Kanon Ota4, Saori Kamohara5, Mayumi Ohnishi1.
Abstract
Objective: The present study aims to investigate the factors related to self-rated ikigai (purpose in life) among older residents participating in hillside residential community-based activities in Nagasaki City.Entities:
Keywords: GDS-15; Nagasaki; community; ikigai; self-rated health
Year: 2021 PMID: 33442434 PMCID: PMC7788305 DOI: 10.2185/jrm.2020-029
Source DB: PubMed Journal: J Rural Med ISSN: 1880-487X
Examples of social participation
| Type of social participation a | Example of activity |
|---|---|
| 1) Community events | Local shrine festivals, Bon (Buddhist) festivals |
| 2) Residents’ associations | General meetings, monthly meetings |
| 3) Community-based seniors’ clubs | Recreation, trips and dinners |
| 4) Hobby clubs | Gate ball, KARAOKE, dance clubs |
| 5) Volunteer activities | Road cleaning in community, helping community-based activities |
| 6) Teaching activities | Teaching origami, swimming, dance, folk songs etc. |
| 7) Child-rearing support | Watching over children on their way to and from school, supporting children’s clubs |
| 8) Peer support for older persons | Assisting senior clubs, visiting homes and keeping company |
| 9) Support of community-based activities | Preparing/conducting community-based activities, setting up chairs or tables, serving tea etc. |
a Items 1–6 were developed by Hashimoto and 7–9 were developed with reference to the White Paper on Aging Society of Japan.
Ikigai score by respondents’ socio-demographic characteristics (n=32)
| n (%) | “Ikigai” scorea | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sex | Male | 7 (21.9) | 9.0 | 0.002 |
| Female | 25 (78.1) | 6.0 | ||
| Age | 60–69 years | 7 (21.9) | 5.0 | 0.181 |
| 70–79 years | 22 (68.8) | 7.0 | ||
| 80 years or over | 3 (9.4) | 5.0 | ||
| Family structure | Living alone | 13 (40.6) | 6.0 | 0.434 |
| Living with spouse | 10 (31.3) | 6.5 | ||
| Living with other members | 8 (25.0) | 8.0 | ||
| Educational background | Junior high school | 3 (9.4) | 7.0 | 0.943 |
| High school | 20 (62.5) | 6.0 | ||
| University/vocational school | 7 (21.9) | 8.0 | ||
| Self-rated economic conditions | Sufficient /comfortable | 13 (40.6) | 7.5 | 0.241 |
| Insufficient/ poor | 17 (53.1) | 6.0 | ||
a Median, b Mann-Whitney U test or Kruskal Wallis test was performed.
Ikigai score by self-rated health, mental health status, and role in the community-based activity (n=32)
| n (%) | “Ikigai” scorea | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Self-rated health | Very good/Good | 20 (62.5) | 8.0 | 0.001 |
| Fair/Poor | 10 (31.3) | 5.0 | ||
| Mental healthc | Normal | 18 (75.0) | 7.25 | 0.015 |
| Depression tendency | 6 (25.0) | 5.0 | ||
| Role of community-based activities | Volunteers | 15 (46.9) | 7.75 | 0.021 |
| Participants | 17 (53.1) | 5.0 | ||
a Median, b Mann-Whitney U test was performed, c Measured by the Geriatric Depression Scale-15.
Figure 1The multiple-choice statement items of respondents’ social participation.
Spearman’s correlation between ikigai score and health status
| “Ikigai” | Social participation | Mental healtha | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Social participation | 0.426* | ||
| Mental healtha | −0.523** | −0.357 | |
| Self-rated health | −0.485** | −0.419* | 0.278 |
a Measured by the Geriatric Depression Scale-15. *P<0.05, **P<0.01.