Osteoporotic vertebral fracture (OVF) is a well-known disease that usually occurs in
elderly patients resulting in increased morbidity and mortality[1], [2]). Moreover, OVF is more common among Japanese elderly people
than among Caucasian elderly people[3]). OVF is conventionally treated with conservative management
comprising bed rest, analgesic therapy, and wearing orthosis[4],[5],[6]).
However, the standard treatment remains controversial because of different empirical
approaches[7]).Although patients with OVF usually have a good clinical course with conservative treatment,
10% to 35% of patients, mainly those with OVF in the thoracolumbar transitional region (T11
to L2), had worse performance in activities of daily living, due to delayed union or
non-union[8]). The Japanese
Orthopedic Association recommends avoiding rigorous bed rest and promotes early rising
because even 3-week bed rest cannot prevent vertebral body collapse for acute OVF patients.
Meanwhile, a survey of the Japanese Orthopedic Association found a non-union rate of
conservative treated acute OVF patients was 37%[9]). Furthermore, bed rest of the initial 2-week has been
recommended for acute OVF patients[10]).We believe that initial conservative intervention is important for early pain relief,
improvement in activities of daily living, and prevention of refractory cases. In a previous
study, we had performed conservative therapy with a unified protocol of an initial 2-week
rigorous bed rest followed by weight-bearing activities, resulting in good clinical outcomes
(bone union rate at 6 months, 78%; non-union rate, 12%; surgical transfer rate, 10%; delayed
paralysis rate, 0%)[11]).However, this protocol has the potential risk of disuse atrophy in elderly patients due to
the relatively long period of rigorous bed rest[11]). Disuse atrophy is the loss of skeletal muscle mass due to
inactivity or lesser than “normal” use[12]). It is characterized by cardiovascular vulnerability,
obesity, musculoskeletal fragility, depression, and premature aging[13]).The purpose of this study was to examine whether 2-week of rigorous bed rest affects disuse
atrophy in OVF patients based on the changes in cognitive function, swallowing function, and
muscle strength.
Patients and Methods
Patients
A total of 54 patients diagnosed with OVF and hospitalized between September 2019 to
April 2020 were included. Patients who could not complete 2-week of rigorous bed rest due
to complications such as dementia and pneumonia and who underwent surgery 2-week after
admission due to complications of paraplegia and diffuse idiopathic skeletal hyperostosis
were excluded.
Protocols
We followed the protocol described by Abe et al.[11]) Magnetic resonance imaging,
computed tomography scan, and dynamic X-ray in standing and supine positions confirmed
fractures[14]). Patients
with a definitive diagnosis of OVF were instructed to lie in a supine position and were
not allowed to sit even while eating or during bowel movement during the initial
2-week[10]). They were
allowed to roll over to a semi-Fowler’s position with 20–30° elevation of the head to
maintain the patient’s kyphosis, so that the patient’s back fitted well alongside the bed
surface. Regular on-bed physical therapy (joint range of motion exercise and muscle
training without weight-bearing to the vertebrae) was started immediately after the
admission to prevent joint contracture and muscle atrophy. Two weeks after admission, they
were allowed to get out of bed for the rehabilitation program, which mainly included
standing up, walking, muscle training of lower extremities, and wearing a ready-to-use
Jewett brace (Nakamura Brace Co., Ltd., Shimane, Japan), which restricts lumbar flexion
and could be worn even if patients had severe thoracolumbar kyphosis. All patients were
instructed to wear the orthosis for 12-weeks until the pain and vertebral instability were
resolved. The patients were allowed to take non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs
according to pain severity.
Outcome measures
Cognitive function, swallowing function, and muscle strength, which relate to
rehabilitation among the indicators of disuse atrophy, were evaluated at three-time points
(admission, end of bed rest after 2-week, and discharge).The Revised Hasegawa’s Dementia Scale (HDS-R)[15], [16]), which comprises a series of items that measure
orientation, memory, attention/calculation, and verbal fluency, was used to evaluate
global cognitive function[17]).
The maximum HDS-R score is 30 points, with a score ≤20 indicating dementia. The Dysphagia
Scoring System (DSS)[18])
consists of four grades: 0, able to eat a normal diet; 1, able to eat some solid food; 2,
able to eat semi-solid food only; 3, able to swallow liquids only; 4, complete dysphagia.
In the Repetitive Saliva Swallowing Test (RSST)[19], [20]), which screens for functional dysphagia, the patient was
asked to swallow his/her saliva as many times as possible in 30 seconds, and <3
swallows per 30 seconds suggest functional dysphasia. Grip strength, which is correlated
to muscle strength and is a predictor of mortality, hospital length of stay, and physical
function[21]), and femoral
and lower-leg circumference, which is correlated to muscle strength and is useful for
determining the developmental state of muscles and bones[22],[23],[24],[25]), were used to evaluate relative muscle strength. In
addition, the walking ability before the injury and at the time of discharge was evaluated
and characterized as independent gait, crutch gait, walker gait, or wheelchair (i.e.,
unable to walk).Ward nursing staff using an original reporting form measured HDS-R, DSS, and RSST. Grip
strength (kg) on both sides was measured by a grip dynamometer (YDD-110; Tsutsumi, Tokyo,
Japan) in unified positions (supine on admission and sitting after finishing the bed rest
with mid-position of the shoulder, elbow, and forearm). Physiotherapists measured the
femoral and lower-leg circumferences with a tape measure placed 10 cm above the superior
pole of the patella and at the maximum circumference of the lower-leg with the subject in
a supine position.
Statistical analyses
All data were expressed as mean ± standard deviation. The rates of change (%) in grip
strength, femoral circumference, and lower-leg circumference from admission to the end of
bed rest and to discharge were calculated and compared with those at the time of admission
by paired t-test. All statistical analyses were performed using GraphPad Prism 8 (GraphPad
Software, San Diego, CA, USA). A significance level of P<0.05 was used
for all comparisons.
Ethical approval
The study was approved by the Ethics Committee of Kenpoku Medical Center Takahagi Kyodo
Hospital (no. R2-2) and conducted according to the principles of the Declaration of
Helsinki. The requirement for informed consent was waived owing to the retrospective
nature of the study.
Results
A total of 54 patients were included (males, 16; females, 38; mean age, 80.2 ± 9.2 years).
The mean length of stay in the hospital was 40.6 ± 25.9 days (range, 15–152 days). The
affected vertebrae are shown in Figure 1. Fifty patients had a single vertebral fracture, and four patients had multiple
vertebral fractures.
Figure 1
The affected vertebrae level.
The affected vertebrae level.
Walking ability
Of the 51 patients who were able to walk independently (including those using assistive
devices) before the injury, only one patient (2.0%) had to use a wheelchair after the
injury. Of the 45 patients who were able to walk independently without an assistive device
before the injury, 24 (53.3%) required some kind of assistive device at the time of
discharge (Figure 2).
Figure 2
Walking ability before injury and at discharge.
Walking ability before injury and at discharge.
Cognitive function
Of the 15 patients whose cognitive function could be evaluated at all three-time points,
5 (33.3%) had cognitive dysfunction (HDS-R <20). During hospitalization, a decline in
cognitive function was observed in five patients (33.3%). Although at the admission,
patients with cognitive dysfunction tend to have a further decrease in cognitive function
during hospitalization (20% of HDS-R >0 at admission, 60% of HDS-R <20 at
admission), no significant difference was observed (P=0.12). Meanwhile,
during hospitalization, no decrease in cognitive function was observed in patients with
HDS-R ≥25 at admission (Figure 3).
Figure 3
The course of HDS-R divided by cognitive function on admission.
The course of HDS-R divided by cognitive function on admission.
Swallowing function
The DSS was 0 (normal) in all patients at admission, and none of the patients reported
decreased DSS during hospitalization. The RSST was normal in all cases at admission;
however, it decreased in one patient at the end of bed rest and showed no improvement
until discharge. None of the patients developed aspiration pneumonia during
hospitalization.
Muscle strength
The rates of change in the grip strength were 6.7 ± 1.7% and 9.7 ± 2.2%, at the end of
bed rest and discharge, respectively. Significant improvement was observed at both the
time points (P=0.04 at the end of bed rest, P=0.02 at
discharge).The rates of change in the femur/lower-leg circumference were −2.6 ± 2.9%/−3.3 ± 2.4% and
−0.9 ± 3.9%/−0.9 ± 3.5% at the end of bed rest and at discharge, respectively. Although
both the circumferences had a significant decrease at the end of bed rest
(P<0.01), both recovered by the time of discharge
(P=0.17) (Figure 4).
Figure 4
The rate of change from admission of grip strength and femur/lower-thigh
circumference.
*P<0.05, **P<0.01.
The rate of change from admission of grip strength and femur/lower-thigh
circumference.*P<0.05, **P<0.01.
Discussion
In this study, we examined if 2-week of rigorous bed rest contributes to disuse atrophy
using a cognitive function scale, a swallowing function scale, and several indexes that are
correlated with muscle strength (grip strength, femoral circumference, and lower-thigh
circumference).Cognitive decline was observed in one-third of the cases in which HDS-R could be
investigated at the three-time points. Determining whether bed rest reduced cognitive
function was difficult because of the changes in the living environment and the onset of
delirium by admission to the hospital. Meanwhile, no cognitive decline was observed in
patients with HDS-R score ≥25, suggesting that the degree of cognitive function at
admission might be affected by the progression of cognitive decline during
hospitalization. To prevent cognitive decline during hospitalization, early termination of
bed rest and using Jewett corset for patients with cognitive function decline during bed
rest, based on the results of HDS-R at admission, should be considered.At admission, DSS scores of all the patients were grade 0 (normal) and remained at the
same level during discharge. No complication related to swallowing dysfunction was
observed during bed rest. Our result suggests that bed rest has little effect on
swallowing function since eating and drinking during bed rest were not restricted.
However, eating and drinking in the supine position (with the headrest inclined by 20–30°)
or the lateral position were required for all patients, and the aspiration risk in these
positions is considered to be higher than that in the sitting position. To prevent
aspiration during bed rest, providing adapted meals for patients by accurately evaluating
their swallowing function during admission is necessary.In this study, the patients’ grip strength increased from admission to discharge. At the
time of admission, pain due to fracture might negatively affect the maximum grip strength.
Moreover, the difference in measurement position (supine at the time of admission and
sitting at the end of bed rest and discharge) might also affect the maximum grip
strength.In the present study, although a significant decrease in the circumference of both the
femur and the lower-leg was observed at the end of bed rest, both recovered at the time of
discharge, and no significant difference was observed compared with the values recorded
during admission. However, poor reproducibility and accuracy of limb circumference
measurement should be considered because it measures not only the muscle but also the
surrounding soft tissues[26]).
Nevertheless, our results suggest that the muscle atrophy that results from a 2-week bed
rest is reversible.Bed rest can lead to rapid muscle deconditioning and atrophy[27]). Studies in young healthy adults have shown
that, after 2-week of immobilization, there was a 5–9% loss of quadriceps muscle mass and
20–27% decrease in quadriceps muscle strength[28], [29]). These effects are often accelerated and more pronounced in
older adults, with a 3- to 6-fold greater rate of muscle loss when compared to those seen
in young adults[30], [31]). To prevent irreversible muscle
atrophy during the period of bed rest, aggressive and persistent rehabilitation while
avoiding painful stress on the fracture site is necessary. Moreover, patients should be
cautioned against carrying out this protocol at home because it poses the risk of
developing disuse syndrome and requires careful monitoring of cognitive dysfunction.
Limitations
The limitations of this study are the small number of cases, the lack of verification of
cases unable to complete the 2-week bed rest, and the simple evaluation of disuse
syndrome. For a more accurate evaluation of the risk of disuse syndrome using this
protocol, further studies should be done to evaluate swallowing function using
esophagography and change in muscle mass using a dual-energy X-ray absorptiometric
scan.
Conclusion
Our results suggest that conservative treatment of 2-week rigorous bed rest with persistent
hospital rehabilitation for OVF patients poses a low risk of disuse atrophy, and initial bed
rest for OVF patients with instability of fracture site can be performed safely. If
cognitive dysfunction is observed on admission, the patient should be closely monitored for
exacerbation during the hospital stay.
Conflict of interest
The authors declare no conflicts of interest associated
with this manuscript.
Authors: Dana Bliuc; Nguyen D Nguyen; Vivienne E Milch; Tuan V Nguyen; John A Eisman; Jacqueline R Center Journal: JAMA Date: 2009-02-04 Impact factor: 56.272