| Literature DB >> 33442371 |
Ricardo Fernández-Ferreira1, Gabriela Alvarado-Luna1, Daniel Motola-Kuba1, Ileana Mackinney-Novelo1, Eduardo Emir Cervera-Ceballos1, Román Segura-Rivera2.
Abstract
Eccrine porocarcinoma (EPC) is an infrequent cutaneous neoplasm, and was described in 1963 by Pinkus and Mehregan. It is a rare type of skin tumor (0.005-0.01% of all skin tumors). Less than 300 cases have been described in the entire world medical literature. To our knowledge, no case of intergluteal cleft EPC has been reported in the literature in English and Spanish to date, so this would be the first reported case of such pathology. Metastatic EPC is less frequent, since only <10% of metastatic type have been reported and the rest as localized disease. The primary treatment of choice is surgical wide local excision of the tumor with histological confirmation of tumor-free margins. Prognosis is difficult to determine because of the rarity of EPC and the variations in natural history. There are no data to support the use of adjuvant chemotherapy or radiotherapy, and there are currently no agreed criteria to define patients at high risk of relapse. We present a 67-year-old man with intergluteal cleft eccrine tumor by biopsy. Metastasis to left inguinal region and lung was reported by contrasted abdominal and chest computed tomography. He started chemotherapy based on etoposide, vincristine, carboplatin. A review of pertinent literature is provided.Entities:
Keywords: Chemotherapy; Eccrine porocarcinoma; Intergluteal cleft; Metastasis
Year: 2020 PMID: 33442371 PMCID: PMC7772857 DOI: 10.1159/000510311
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Case Rep Oncol ISSN: 1662-6575
Fig. 1Immunohistochemistry: In spite of the different morphologies, most of the cells showed reactivity to immunostains with AE1/3, CK7 (A) and CK19 (B), which confirms their epithelial lineage. The spindle cell areas were negative for vimentin (E, F), which only marked the accompanying stroma. Chromogranin (C) and synaptophysin (D) were also negative.
Fig. 2Hematoxylin & eosin: Some of the tumoral nests show clearing of the cytoplasm, with a foamy appearance and with small vacuolar formations. (A) The zones with eccrine differentiation (B) show ductular formation with mucoid content. Other areas exhibit squamous differentiation (C), whose cells are large, with broad and eosinophilic cytoplasm. Histologically, the neoplasm is heterogeneous, composed predominantly of compact nests of small, basaloid cells (D) with scant cytoplasm; some of these cells displayed mild spindling.
Eccrine carcinoma pathological stages
| Eccrine carcinoma pathological stages (pTNM) |
|---|
| pTX: Primary tumor not assessable |
| pT0: No evidence of primary tumor |
| pTis: Carcinoma in situ |
| pT1: Tumor 2 cm or less in the largest dimension |
| – pT1a: Limited to the dermis or 2 mm or less in thickness |
| – pT1b: Limited to the dermis and more than 2 mm in thickness, but not more than 6 mm in thickness |
| – pT1c: Invading the subcutis and/or more than 6 mm in thickness |
| pT2: Tumor greater than 2 cm but not more than 5 cm in its greatest dimension |
| – pT2a: Limited to the dermis or 2 mm or less in thickness |
| – pT2b: Limited to the dermis and more than 2 mm in thickness but not more than 6 mm in thickness |
| – pT2c: Invading the subcutis and/or more than 6 mm in thickness |
| pT3: Tumor over 5 cm in its greatest dimension |
| – pT3a: Limited to the dermis or 2 mm or less in thickness |
| – pT3b: Limited to the dermis and more than 2 mm in thickness, but not more than 6 mm in thickness |
| – pT3c: Invading the subcutis and/or more than 6 mm in thickness |
| pT4: Tumor invades the deep extradermal tissue (e.g., cartilage, skeletal muscle, bone) |
| – pT4a: 6 mm or less in thickness |
| – pT4b: More than 6 mm in thickness |
| Regional lymph nodes (pN) |
| – pNX: Regional lymph nodes not assessable |
| – pN0: No regional lymph node metastasis |
| – pN1: Regional lymph node metastasis |
| Distant metastasis (pM) |
| – pMX: Presence of distant metastasis not assessable |
| – pM1: Distant metastasis |
Fig. 3Diagnostic and treatment algorithm followed in the series presented and based on the literature reviewed.
General characteristics, treatment (surgical resection, radiation therapy, and chemotherapy), objective response, or global survival of metastatic EPC after chemotherapy
| First author | Age, years | Sex | Site | Size, mm | Lymph node/distant metastasis | Surgical resection | Radiation therapy | Chemotherapy | Overall survival, months |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Kurashige, 2013 | 50 | M | Left arm | 80 | + | + | 21 Gy | Docetaxel + cisplatin | 8 |
| Mandaliya, 2016 | 66 | F | Right forearm | – | + | + | 50 Gy | Docetaxel + cisplatin | Complete Response |
| Godillot, 2018 | 64 | F | Pubic | 50 | + | + | 57 Gy | Cetuximab + paclitaxel | Complete response |
| Ishida, 2011 | 72 | M | Right thigh | 17 | + | + | – | Carboplatin and farmorubicin | 8 |
| Joseph, 2015 | 56 | M | Anterior abdominal wall | 100 | + | – | Doxorubicin, mitomycin, vincristine, and 5-FU, bleomycin, paclitaxel, carboplatin, and docetaxel | 14 | |
| Kim, 2007 | 42 | M | Right palm | – | + | + | + | Cyclophosphamide, cisplatin, and doxorubicin | 3 |
| Grimme, 1999 | 47 | M | Head | 15 | + | + | 45 Gy | Bleomycin, 5-fluorouracil, carboplatin, interferon-alpha, and 1L2 | 6 |
| Shiohara, 2007 | 62 | F | Head | 98 | + | + | 50 Gy | Cisplatin, adriamycin, VDS/mitomycin, vincristine, and epirubicin | 35 |
| Permal, 2000 | 67 | F | Left thigh | 150 | + | + | – | Tamoxifen | 1 |
| Gonzalez, 2003 | 71 | M | Right thigh | 40 | + | + | 60 Gy | Isotretinoin and tegafur | 66 |
| Plunkett, 2001 | 45 | F | Left shoulder | 10 | + | + | BERT | Epirubicin and docetaxel | 9 |
| Swanson, 1989 | 78 | M | Left shoulder | – | + | + | + | Continuous infusion 5-fluorouracil | Complete response |
| De Bree, 2005 | 69 | M | Left thigh | 150 | + | + | – | Topical application of 3% 5-fluorouracil ointment, and docetaxel | 25 |
| Gutermuth, 2004 67 | M | Left neck | 100 | + | + | – | Interferon-alpha and paclitaxel | 7 | |