Literature DB >> 33441526

Cut-Off Values of the Post-Intensive Care Syndrome Questionnaire for the Screening of Unplanned Hospital Readmission within One Year.

Jiyeon Kang1, Yeon Jin Jeong2, Jiwon Hong3.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: This study aimed to assign weights for subscales and items of the Post-Intensive Care Syndrome questionnaire and suggest optimal cut-off values for screening unplanned hospital readmissions of critical care survivors.
METHODS: Seventeen experts participated in an analytic hierarchy process for weight assignment. Participants for cut-off analysis were 240 survivors who had been admitted to intensive care units for more than 48 hours in three cities in Korea. We assessed participants using the 18-item Post-Intensive Care Syndrome questionnaire, generated receiver operating characteristic curves, and analysed cut-off values for unplanned readmission based on sensitivity, specificity, and positive likelihood ratios.
RESULTS: Cognitive, physical, and mental subscale weights were 1.13, 0.95, and 0.92, respectively. Incidence of unplanned readmission was 25.4%. Optimal cut-off values were 23.00 for raw scores and 23.73 for weighted scores (total score 54.00), with an area of under the curve (AUC) of .933 and .929, respectively. There was no significant difference in accuracy for original and weighted scores.
CONCLUSION: The optimal cut-off value accuracy is excellent for screening of unplanned readmissions. We recommend that nurses use the Post-Intensive Care Syndrome Questionnaire to screen for readmission risk or evaluating relevant interventions for critical care survivors.
© 2020 Korean Society of Nursing Science.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Intensive Care Unit; Patient Readmission; ROC Curve; Reproducibility of Results; Survivor

Year:  2020        PMID: 33441526     DOI: 10.4040/jkan.20233

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Korean Acad Nurs        ISSN: 2005-3673            Impact factor:   0.984


  31 in total

1.  Trajectories of recovery and dysfunction after acute illness, with implications for clinical trial design.

Authors:  Theodore J Iwashyna
Journal:  Am J Respir Crit Care Med       Date:  2012-08-15       Impact factor: 21.405

Review 2.  Improving long-term outcomes after discharge from intensive care unit: report from a stakeholders' conference.

Authors:  Dale M Needham; Judy Davidson; Henry Cohen; Ramona O Hopkins; Craig Weinert; Hannah Wunsch; Christine Zawistowski; Anita Bemis-Dougherty; Susan C Berney; O Joseph Bienvenu; Susan L Brady; Martin B Brodsky; Linda Denehy; Doug Elliott; Carl Flatley; Andrea L Harabin; Christina Jones; Deborah Louis; Wendy Meltzer; Sean R Muldoon; Jeffrey B Palmer; Christiane Perme; Marla Robinson; David M Schmidt; Elizabeth Scruth; Gayle R Spill; C Porter Storey; Marta Render; John Votto; Maurene A Harvey
Journal:  Crit Care Med       Date:  2012-02       Impact factor: 7.598

3.  Understanding and improving clinical trial outcome measures in acute respiratory failure.

Authors:  Dale M Needham
Journal:  Am J Respir Crit Care Med       Date:  2014-04-15       Impact factor: 21.405

4.  Core Outcome Measures for Clinical Research in Acute Respiratory Failure Survivors. An International Modified Delphi Consensus Study.

Authors:  Dale M Needham; Kristin A Sepulveda; Victor D Dinglas; Caroline M Chessare; Lisa Aronson Friedman; Clifton O Bingham; Alison E Turnbull
Journal:  Am J Respir Crit Care Med       Date:  2017-11-01       Impact factor: 21.405

5.  Development and validation of a questionnaire to measure post-intensive care syndrome.

Authors:  Yeon Jin Jeong; Jiyeon Kang
Journal:  Intensive Crit Care Nurs       Date:  2019-09-12       Impact factor: 3.072

Review 6.  Outcome Measurement in ICU Survivorship Research From 1970 to 2013: A Scoping Review of 425 Publications.

Authors:  Alison E Turnbull; Anahita Rabiee; Wesley E Davis; Mohamed Farhan Nasser; Venkat Reddy Venna; Rohini Lolitha; Ramona O Hopkins; O Joseph Bienvenu; Karen A Robinson; Dale M Needham
Journal:  Crit Care Med       Date:  2016-07       Impact factor: 7.598

Review 7.  Is the readmission rate a valid quality indicator? A review of the evidence.

Authors:  Claudia Fischer; Hester F Lingsma; Perla J Marang-van de Mheen; Dionne S Kringos; Niek S Klazinga; Ewout W Steyerberg
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-11-07       Impact factor: 3.240

8.  The association of intensive care with utilization and costs of outpatient healthcare services and quality of life.

Authors:  Robert P Kosilek; Sebastian E Baumeister; Till Ittermann; Matthias Gründling; Frank M Brunkhorst; Stephan B Felix; Peter Abel; Sigrun Friesecke; Christian Apfelbacher; Magdalena Brandl; Konrad Schmidt; Wolfgang Hoffmann; Carsten O Schmidt; Jean-François Chenot; Henry Völzke; Jochen S Gensichen
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2019-09-20       Impact factor: 3.240

9.  Five-Year Mortality and Hospital Costs Associated with Surviving Intensive Care.

Authors:  Nazir I Lone; Michael A Gillies; Catriona Haddow; Richard Dobbie; Kathryn M Rowan; Sarah H Wild; Gordon D Murray; Timothy S Walsh
Journal:  Am J Respir Crit Care Med       Date:  2016-07-15       Impact factor: 21.405

Review 10.  How outcomes are defined in clinical trials of mechanically ventilated adults and children.

Authors:  Bronagh Blackwood; Mike Clarke; Danny F McAuley; Peter J McGuigan; John C Marshall; Louise Rose
Journal:  Am J Respir Crit Care Med       Date:  2014-04-15       Impact factor: 21.405

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.