Literature DB >> 33441301

Mitigating ethical conflict and moral distress in the care of patients on ECMO: impact of an automatic ethics consultation protocol.

M Jeanne Wirpsa1,2, Louanne M Carabini3,4, Kathy Johnson Neely5,6, Camille Kroll7, Lucia D Wocial8,9.   

Abstract

AIMS: This study evaluates a protocol for early, routine ethics consultation (EC) for patients on extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) to support decision-making in the context of clinical uncertainty with the aim of mitigating ethical conflict and moral distress.
METHODS: We conducted a single-site qualitative analysis of EC documentation for all patients receiving ECMO support from 15 August 2018 to 15 May 2019 (n=68). Detailed analysis of 20 ethically complex cases with protracted ethics involvement identifies four key ethical domains: limits of prognostication, bridge to nowhere, burden of treatment and system-level concerns. There are three subthemes: relevant contextual factors, the role of EC and observed outcomes. Content analysis of transcripts from interviews with 20 members of the multidisciplinary ECMO team yields supplemental data on providers' perceptions of the impact of the early intervention protocol.
RESULTS: Limited outcome data for ECMO, unclear indications for withdrawal, adverse effects of treatment and an obligation to attend to programme metrics present significant ethical challenges in the care of this patient population. Upstream EC mitigates ethical conflict by setting clear expectations about ECMO as a time limited trial, promoting consistent messaging among multiple services and supporting surrogate decision-makers. When ECMO becomes a 'bridge to nowhere', EC facilitates decision-making that respects patient values yet successfully sets limits on non-beneficial use of this novel therapy.
CONCLUSION: Data from this study support the conclusion that ECMO poses unique ethical challenges that necessitate a standardised protocol for early, routine EC-at least while this medical technology is in its nascent stages. © Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2021. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ.

Entities:  

Keywords:  clinical ethics; decision-making; end of life care; ethics; ethics committees/consultation

Year:  2021        PMID: 33441301     DOI: 10.1136/medethics-2020-106881

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Med Ethics        ISSN: 0306-6800            Impact factor:   2.903


  2 in total

Review 1.  Clinical ethics consultations: a scoping review of reported outcomes.

Authors:  Jennifer A H Bell; Marina Salis; Eryn Tong; Erica Nekolaichuk; Claudia Barned; Andria Bianchi; Daniel Z Buchman; Kevin Rodrigues; Ruby R Shanker; Ann M Heesters
Journal:  BMC Med Ethics       Date:  2022-09-27       Impact factor: 2.834

Review 2.  Extracorporeal membrane oxygenation in children receiving haematopoietic cell transplantation and immune effector cell therapy: an international and multidisciplinary consensus statement.

Authors:  Matteo Di Nardo; Ali H Ahmad; Pietro Merli; Matthew S Zinter; Leslie E Lehman; Courtney M Rowan; Marie E Steiner; Sangeeta Hingorani; Joseph R Angelo; Hisham Abdel-Azim; Sajad J Khazal; Basirat Shoberu; Jennifer McArthur; Rajinder Bajwa; Saad Ghafoor; Samir H Shah; Hitesh Sandhu; Karen Moody; Brandon D Brown; Maria E Mireles; Diana Steppan; Taylor Olson; Lakshmi Raman; Brian Bridges; Christine N Duncan; Sung Won Choi; Rita Swinford; Matt Paden; James D Fortenberry; Giles Peek; Pierre Tissieres; Daniele De Luca; Franco Locatelli; Selim Corbacioglu; Martin Kneyber; Alessio Franceschini; Simon Nadel; Matthias Kumpf; Alessandra Loreti; Roelie Wösten-Van Asperen; Orsola Gawronski; Joe Brierley; Graeme MacLaren; Kris M Mahadeo
Journal:  Lancet Child Adolesc Health       Date:  2021-12-09
  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.