Literature DB >> 33441181

Feasibility and acceptability of a preoperative exercise program for patients undergoing major cancer surgery: results from a pilot randomized controlled trial.

Daniel Steffens1,2, Jane Young3,4,5, Paula R Beckenkamp6, James Ratcliffe7, Freya Rubie7, Nabila Ansari3, Neil Pillinger4,8, Cherry Koh3, Phillip A Munoz6,9, Michael Solomon3,4,5.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To establish the feasibility and acceptability of a preoperative exercise program, and to obtain pilot data on the likely difference in key surgical outcomes to inform the sample size calculation for a full-scale trial.
DESIGN: Pilot randomized controlled trial.
SETTING: Royal Prince Alfred Hospital, Sydney, Australia.
SUBJECTS: We included patients undergoing elective pelvic exenteration or cytoreductive surgery aged 18 to 80 years, who presented to the participating gastrointestinal surgeon at least 2 weeks prior to surgery. Patients presenting cognitive impairment, co-morbidity preventing participation in exercise, inadequate English language, currently participating in an exercise program or unable to attend the exercise program sessions were excluded.
METHODS: Participants were randomized to a 2-6 weeks preoperative, face-to-face, individualised exercise program or to usual care. Feasibility was assessed with consent rates to the study, and for the intervention group, retention and adherence rates to the preoperative exercise program. Acceptability of the exercise program was assessed with a semi-structured questionnaire exploring the advice received and the amount, duration and intensity of the exercise program. In addition, postoperative complication rates (Clavien-Dindo), length of hospital stay and self-reported measures of health-related quality of life (SF-36v2) were collected at baseline, day before surgery and in-hospital up to discharge from hospital.
RESULTS: Of 122 patients screened, 26 (21%) were eligible and 22 (85%) accepted to participate in the trial and were randomized to the intervention (11; 50%) or control group (11; 50%). The median age of the include participants was 63 years. Adherence to the preoperative exercise sessions was 92.7%, with all participants either satisfied (33%) or extremely satisfied (67%) with the overall design of the preoperative exercise program. No significant differences in outcomes were found between groups.
CONCLUSIONS: The results of our pilot trial demonstrate that a preoperative exercise program is feasible and acceptable to patients undergoing major abdominal cancer surgery. There is an urgent need for a definite trial investigating the effectiveness of a preoperative exercise program on postoperative outcomes in patients undergoing major abdominal cancer surgery. This could potentially reduce postoperative complication rates, length of hospital stay and subsequently overall health care costs. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ACTRN12617001129370. Registered on August 1, 2017, https://www.anzctr.org.au/Trial/Registration/TrialReview.aspx?id=373396&showOriginal=true&isReview=true.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Acceptability; Cancer; Feasibility; Pilot randomized controlled trial; Preoperative exercise; Surgery

Year:  2021        PMID: 33441181     DOI: 10.1186/s40814-021-00765-8

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Pilot Feasibility Stud        ISSN: 2055-5784


  20 in total

1.  The Clavien-Dindo classification of surgical complications: five-year experience.

Authors:  Pierre A Clavien; Jeffrey Barkun; Michelle L de Oliveira; Jean Nicolas Vauthey; Daniel Dindo; Richard D Schulick; Eduardo de Santibañes; Juan Pekolj; Ksenija Slankamenac; Claudio Bassi; Rolf Graf; René Vonlanthen; Robert Padbury; John L Cameron; Masatoshi Makuuchi
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2009-08       Impact factor: 12.969

2.  Is preoperative physical activity level of patients undergoing cancer surgery associated with postoperative outcomes? A systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Daniel Steffens; Paula R Beckenkamp; Jane Young; Michael Solomon; Tatiane M da Silva; Mark J Hancock
Journal:  Eur J Surg Oncol       Date:  2018-10-21       Impact factor: 4.424

3.  Pelvic exenteration for advanced and recurrent malignancy.

Authors:  Evita Zoucas; Sven Frederiksen; Marie-Louise Lydrup; Wiking Månsson; Pelle Gustafson; Per Alberius
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2010-09       Impact factor: 3.352

Review 4.  Pelvic exenteration for rectal cancer: a systematic review.

Authors:  Timothy X Yang; David L Morris; Terence C Chua
Journal:  Dis Colon Rectum       Date:  2013-04       Impact factor: 4.585

5.  Quality of life and other patient-reported outcomes following exenteration for pelvic malignancy.

Authors:  J M Young; T Badgery-Parker; L M Masya; M King; C Koh; A C Lynch; A G Heriot; M J Solomon
Journal:  Br J Surg       Date:  2014-01-13       Impact factor: 6.939

6.  Cohort study of long-term survival and quality of life following pelvic exenteration.

Authors:  D Steffens; M J Solomon; J M Young; C Koh; R L Venchiarutti; P Lee; K Austin
Journal:  BJS Open       Date:  2018-05-22

7.  Preliminary evidence for physical activity following pelvic exenteration: a pilot longitudinal cohort study.

Authors:  Daniel Steffens; Jane M Young; Michael Solomon; Paula R Beckenkamp; Cherry Koh; Kenneth Vuong; Matthew A Brodie; Kim Delbaere
Journal:  BMC Cancer       Date:  2019-07-04       Impact factor: 4.430

8.  Defining Feasibility and Pilot Studies in Preparation for Randomised Controlled Trials: Development of a Conceptual Framework.

Authors:  Sandra M Eldridge; Gillian A Lancaster; Michael J Campbell; Lehana Thabane; Sally Hopewell; Claire L Coleman; Christine M Bond
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2016-03-15       Impact factor: 3.240

9.  CONSORT 2010 statement: extension to randomised pilot and feasibility trials.

Authors:  Sandra M Eldridge; Claire L Chan; Michael J Campbell; Christine M Bond; Sally Hopewell; Lehana Thabane; Gillian A Lancaster
Journal:  Pilot Feasibility Stud       Date:  2016-10-21

10.  Feasibility and acceptability of PrE-operative Physical Activity to improve patient outcomes After major cancer surgery: study protocol for a pilot randomised controlled trial (PEPA Trial).

Authors:  Daniel Steffens; Jane Young; Paula R Beckenkamp; James Ratcliffe; Freya Rubie; Nabila Ansari; Neil Pillinger; Michael Solomon
Journal:  Trials       Date:  2018-02-17       Impact factor: 2.279

View more
  3 in total

1.  PRehabIlitatiOn with pReoperatIve exercise and educaTion for patients undergoing major abdominal cancer surgerY: protocol for a multicentre randomised controlled TRIAL (PRIORITY TRIAL).

Authors:  Daniel Steffens; Jane Young; Bernhard Riedel; Rachael Morton; Linda Denehy; Alexander Heriot; Cherry Koh; Qiang Li; Adrian Bauman; Charbel Sandroussi; Hilmy Ismail; Mbathio Dieng; Nabila Ansari; Neil Pillinger; Sarah O'Shannassy; Sam McKeown; Derek Cunningham; Kym Sheehan; Gino Iori; Jenna Bartyn; Michael Solomon
Journal:  BMC Cancer       Date:  2022-04-22       Impact factor: 4.638

2.  Feasibility of a prehabilitation program before major abdominal surgery: a pilot prospective study.

Authors:  David Martin; Cyril Besson; Basile Pache; Anna Michel; Sandrine Geinoz; Vincent Gremeaux-Bader; Anna Larcinese; Charles Benaim; Bengt Kayser; Nicolas Demartines; Martin Hübner
Journal:  J Int Med Res       Date:  2021-11       Impact factor: 1.671

Review 3.  Is there evidence behind pre- or perioperative cognitive training in gynaecological patients on the prevention of perioperative cognitive dysfunction? A review.

Authors:  Sophia Volz; Franziska Koch; Davud Dayan; Miriam Upadhyay; Stephanie Otto; Fabienne Schochter; Wolfgang Janni; Florian Ebner
Journal:  Arch Gynecol Obstet       Date:  2021-12-07       Impact factor: 2.493

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.