Literature DB >> 33440608

Implementation of Robotic Assistance in Pancreatic Surgery: Experiences from the First 101 Consecutive Cases.

Lea Timmermann1, Matthias Biebl1, Moritz Schmelzle1, Marcus Bahra1, Thomas Malinka1, Johann Pratschke1.   

Abstract

Robotic assisted minimally invasive surgery has been implemented to overcome typical limitations of conventional laparoscopy such as lack of angulation, especially during creation of biliary and pancreatic anastomoses. With this retrospective analysis, we provide our experience with the first 101 consecutive robotic pancreatic resection performed at our center. Distal pancreatectomies (RDP, N = 44), total pancreatectomies (RTP, N = 3) and pancreaticoduodenectomies (RPD, N = 54) were included. Malignancy was found in 45.5% (RDP), 66.7% (RTP) and 61% (RPD). Procedure times decreased from the first to the second half of the cohort for RDP (218 min vs. 128 min, p = 0.02) and RPD (378 min vs. 271 min, p < 0.001). Overall complication rate was 63%, 33% and 66% for RPD, RPT and RDP, respectively. Reintervention and reoperation rates were 41% and 17% (RPD), 33% and 0% (RTP) and 50% and 11.4% (RPD), respectively. The thirty-day mortality rate was 5.6% for RPD and nil for RTP and RDP. Overall complication rate remained stable throughout the study period. In this series, implementation of robotic pancreas surgery was safe and feasible. Final evaluation of the anastomoses through the median retrieval incision compensated for the lack of haptic feedback during reconstruction and allowed for secure minimally invasive resection and reconstruction.

Entities:  

Keywords:  pancreatic surgery; pancreaticoduodenectomy; robotic assisted surgery

Year:  2021        PMID: 33440608     DOI: 10.3390/jcm10020229

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Clin Med        ISSN: 2077-0383            Impact factor:   4.241


  4 in total

1.  Robotic-assisted pancreatic surgery in the elderly patient: experiences from a high-volume centre.

Authors:  Karl H Hillebrandt; Sebastian Knitter; Lea Timmermann; Matthäus Felsenstein; Christian Benzing; Moritz Schmelzle; Johann Pratschke; Thomas Malinka
Journal:  BMC Surg       Date:  2021-12-09       Impact factor: 2.102

2.  Feasibility of robotic-assisted pancreatic resection in patients with previous minor abdominal surgeries: a single-center experience of the first three years.

Authors:  Paul Viktor Ritschl; Hannah Kristin Miller; Karl Hillebrandt; Lea Timmermann; Matthäus Felsenstein; Christian Benzing; Brigitta Globke; Robert Öllinger; Wenzel Schöning; Moritz Schmelzle; Johann Pratschke; Thomas Malinka
Journal:  BMC Surg       Date:  2022-03-04       Impact factor: 2.102

3.  Robotic versus open pancreatic surgery: a propensity score-matched cost-effectiveness analysis.

Authors:  Christian Benzing; Lea Timmermann; Thomas Winklmann; Lena Marie Haiden; Karl Herbert Hillebrandt; Axel Winter; Max Magnus Maurer; Matthäus Felsenstein; Felix Krenzien; Moritz Schmelzle; Johann Pratschke; Thomas Malinka
Journal:  Langenbecks Arch Surg       Date:  2022-03-21       Impact factor: 2.895

4.  Robot-assisted pancreatic surgery-optimized operating procedures: set-up, port placement, surgical steps.

Authors:  Matthäus Felsenstein; Karl H Hillebrandt; Lea Timmermann; Mathilde Feist; Christian Benzing; Moritz Schmelzle; Johann Pratschke; Thomas Malinka
Journal:  J Robot Surg       Date:  2021-09-02
  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.