Literature DB >> 33440173

Non-Vitamin K Antagonist Oral Anticoagulant vs Warfarin for Post Cardiac Surgery Atrial Fibrillation.

Victor Nauffal1, Ludovic Trinquart2, Asishana Osho3, Thoralf M Sundt3, Steven A Lubitz4, Patrick T Ellinor5.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Treatment guidelines for non-valvular atrial fibrillation (AF) recommend use of non-vitamin K antagonist oral anticoagulants (NOAC) over warfarin, yet clinical trials excluded individuals with post-cardiac surgery AF. We sought to compare outcomes with NOACs vs. warfarin for new onset post-cardiac surgery AF.
METHODS: We examined 26,522 patients from the Society of Thoracic Surgeons' database with post-cardiac surgery AF who were discharged on oral anticoagulation from July 2017-December 2018. Three primary outcomes were evaluated including 30-day mortality, major bleeding complications and stroke/transient ischemic attack (TIA). Secondary outcomes included post-operative length of stay (LOS) and 30-day myocardial infarction, venous thromboembolism and pericardial effusion/tamponade.
RESULTS: 9,769 (36.8%) participants were prescribed NOACs and 16,753 (63.2%) warfarin. In multivariable analysis, there was no association between type of anticoagulant and 30-day major bleeding complications (ORNOAC/warfarin=0.76,95% CI 0.49-1.18), stroke/TIA (ORNOAC/warfarin=0.94,95% CI 0.53-1.67) or mortality (ORNOAC/warfarin=1.08,95% CI 0.80-1.45). Following stratification by renal function or isolated coronary bypass vs. valve surgery, there remained no difference in the primary outcomes. Additionally, there was no difference in 30-day myocardial infarction (ORNOAC/warfarin=1.17,95% CI 0.62-2.22), venous thromboembolism (ORNOAC/warfarin=0.91,95% CI 0.47-1.78) or pericardial effusion/tamponade (ORNOAC/warfarin=1.09,95% CI 0.80-1.47) between the two groups. NOAC therapy was associated with a half-day reduction in post-operative LOS (βNOAC/warfarin=-0.47,95% CI -0.62 to -0.33).
CONCLUSIONS: NOACs are associated with a reduction in post-operative LOS, without excess bleeding or other short-term complications, compared to warfarin. These findings support the broader use of NOACs as a safe alternative to warfarin in patients with post-cardiac surgery AF at elevated stroke risk and acceptable bleeding risk.
Copyright © 2021. Published by Elsevier Inc.

Entities:  

Year:  2021        PMID: 33440173     DOI: 10.1016/j.athoracsur.2020.12.031

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ann Thorac Surg        ISSN: 0003-4975            Impact factor:   4.330


  3 in total

1.  Oral anticoagulation following bioprosthetic SAVR in patients with atrial fibrillation: what's the current status of NOACs?

Authors:  Milan Milojevic; Aleksandar Nikolic; Slobodan Micovic; Anders Jeppsson
Journal:  Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg       Date:  2022-06-15

2.  Are NOACs as safe and efficient as VKA regarding thromboembolic prophylaxis and major bleeding in patients with surgical bioprosthesis and atrial fibrillation within 3 months of surgery?

Authors:  Pedro Lamares Magro; Miguel Sousa-Uva
Journal:  Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg       Date:  2022-05-02

Review 3.  Use of Anticoagulation Therapy in Patients With Perioperative Atrial Fibrillation After Cardiac Surgery: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.

Authors:  Michael Ke Wang; Rachel Heo; Pascal Meyre; Louis Park; Steffen Blum; William F McIntyre; Emilie Belley-Côté; Lauren Birchenough; Kiven Vuong; Jeff S Healey; P J Devereaux; André Lamy; David Conen
Journal:  CJC Open       Date:  2022-06-10
  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.