Literature DB >> 33440129

Implementation of a Lung Cancer Screening Program in Two Federally Qualified Health Centers.

Lesley Watson1,2, Megan M Cotter3, Shauna Shafer4, Kara Neloms4, Robert A Smith5, Katherine Sharpe6.   

Abstract

Using low-dose computed tomography (LDCT) to screen for lung cancer is associated with improved outcomes among eligible current and former smokers (ie, aged 55-77, at least 30-pack-year smoking history, current smoker or former smoker who quit within the past 15 years). However, the overall uptake of LDCT is low, especially in health care settings with limited personnel and financial resources. To increase access to lung cancer screening services, the American Cancer Society partnered with 2 federally qualified health centers (FQHCs) in Tennessee and West Virginia to conduct a pilot project focused on developing and refining the LDCT screening referral processes and practices. Each FQHC was required to partner with an American College of Radiology-designated lung cancer screening center in its area to ensure high-quality patient care. The pilot project was conducted in 2 phases: 6 months of capacity building (January-June 2016) followed by 2 years of implementation (July 2016-June 2018). One site created a sustainable LDCT referral program, and the other site encountered numerous barriers and failed to overcome them. This case study highlights implementation barriers and factors associated with success and improved outcomes in LDCT screening.

Entities:  

Keywords:  cancer screening; federally qualified health centers; low-dose computed tomography; lung cancer; vulnerable populations

Mesh:

Year:  2021        PMID: 33440129      PMCID: PMC8203035          DOI: 10.1177/0033354920971717

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Public Health Rep        ISSN: 0033-3549            Impact factor:   3.117


  17 in total

1.  Pack-Year Cigarette Smoking History for Determination of Lung Cancer Screening Eligibility. Comparison of the Electronic Medical Record versus a Shared Decision-making Conversation.

Authors:  Hannah E Modin; Joelle T Fathi; Christopher R Gilbert; Candice L Wilshire; Andrew K Wilson; Ralph W Aye; Alexander S Farivar; Brian E Louie; Eric Vallières; Jed A Gorden
Journal:  Ann Am Thorac Soc       Date:  2017-08

Review 2.  Barriers to Lung Cancer Screening Engagement from the Patient and Provider Perspective.

Authors:  Gary X Wang; Travis P Baggett; Pari V Pandharipande; Elyse R Park; Sanja Percac-Lima; Jo-Anne O Shepard; Florian J Fintelmann; Efren J Flores
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2019-01-08       Impact factor: 11.105

3.  Lung Cancer Screening With Low-Dose Computed Tomography in the United States-2010 to 2015.

Authors:  Ahmedin Jemal; Stacey A Fedewa
Journal:  JAMA Oncol       Date:  2017-09-01       Impact factor: 31.777

4.  High-risk community and primary care providers knowledge about and barriers to low-dose computed topography lung cancer screening.

Authors:  Vani N Simmons; Jhanelle E Gray; Matthew B Schabath; Lauren E Wilson; Gwendolyn P Quinn
Journal:  Lung Cancer       Date:  2017-01-31       Impact factor: 5.705

5.  Reduced lung-cancer mortality with low-dose computed tomographic screening.

Authors:  Denise R Aberle; Amanda M Adams; Christine D Berg; William C Black; Jonathan D Clapp; Richard M Fagerstrom; Ilana F Gareen; Constantine Gatsonis; Pamela M Marcus; JoRean D Sicks
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2011-06-29       Impact factor: 91.245

6.  A blueprint for cancer screening and early detection: Advancing screening's contribution to cancer control.

Authors:  Richard C Wender; Otis W Brawley; Stacey A Fedewa; Ted Gansler; Robert A Smith
Journal:  CA Cancer J Clin       Date:  2018-11-19       Impact factor: 508.702

7.  Improving the Implementation of Lung Cancer Screening Guidelines at an Academic Primary Care Practice.

Authors:  Alison T Brenner; Laura Cubillos; Katherine Birchard; Caleb Doyle-Burr; John Eick; Louise Henderson; Laura Jones; Michael Massaro; Bailey Minish; Paul Molina; Michael Pignone; Shana Ratner; Maria Patricia Rivera; Daniel S Reuland
Journal:  J Healthc Qual       Date:  2018 Jan/Feb       Impact factor: 1.095

8.  Challenges Implementing Lung Cancer Screening in Federally Qualified Health Centers.

Authors:  Steven B Zeliadt; Richard M Hoffman; Genevieve Birkby; Jan M Eberth; Alison T Brenner; Daniel S Reuland; Susan A Flocke
Journal:  Am J Prev Med       Date:  2018-02-21       Impact factor: 6.604

9.  Lung cancer screening: what do long-term smokers know and believe?

Authors:  Lisa Carter-Harris; DuyKhanh Pham Ceppa; Nasser Hanna; Susan M Rawl
Journal:  Health Expect       Date:  2015-12-23       Impact factor: 3.377

10.  "To know or not to know…?" Push and pull in ever smokers lung screening uptake decision-making intentions.

Authors:  Janet E Tonge; Melanie Atack; Phil A Crosbie; Phil V Barber; Richard Booton; Denis Colligan
Journal:  Health Expect       Date:  2018-10-05       Impact factor: 3.377

View more
  1 in total

1.  A Lung Cancer Screening Education Program Impacts both Referral Rates and Provider and Medical Assistant Knowledge at Two Federally Qualified Health Centers.

Authors:  Aamna Akhtar; Ernesto Sosa; Samuel Castro; Melissa Sur; Vanessa Lozano; Gail D'Souza; Sophia Yeung; Jonjon Macalintal; Meghna Patel; Xiaoke Zou; Pei-Chi Wu; Ellen Silver; Jossie Sandoval; Stacy W Gray; Karen L Reckamp; Jae Y Kim; Virginia Sun; Dan J Raz; Loretta Erhunmwunsee
Journal:  Clin Lung Cancer       Date:  2021-12-12       Impact factor: 4.840

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.