| Literature DB >> 33440006 |
Pilar Junier1, Guillaume Cailleau1, Ilona Palmieri1, Celine Vallotton1, Olivia C Trautschold2, Thomas Junier1,3, Christophe Paul1, Danae Bregnard1, Fabio Palmieri1, Aislinn Estoppey1, Matteo Buffi1, Andrea Lohberger1, Aaron Robinson4, Julia M Kelliher4, Karen Davenport4, Geoffrey L House4, Demosthenes Morales4, La Verne Gallegos-Graves4, Armand E K Dichosa4, Simone Lupini5, Hang N Nguyen5, Jamey D Young6, Debora F Rodrigues5, A Nicholas G Parra-Vasquez2, Saskia Bindschedler1, Patrick S G Chain4.
Abstract
Bacteria-fungi interactions (BFIs) are essential in ecosystem functioning. These interactions are modulated not only by local nutritional conditions but also by the physicochemical constraints and 3D structure of the environmental niche. In soils, the unsaturated and complex nature of the substrate restricts the dispersal and activity of bacteria. Under unsaturated conditions, some bacteria engage with filamentous fungi in an interaction (fungal highways) in which they use fungal hyphae to disperse. Based on a previous experimental device to enrich pairs of organisms engaging in this interaction in soils, we present here the design and validation of a modified version of this sampling system constructed using additive printing. The 3D printed devices were tested using a novel application in which a target fungus, the common coprophilous fungus Coprinopsis cinerea, was used as bait to recruit and identify bacterial partners using its mycelium for dispersal. Bacteria of the genera Pseudomonas, Sphingobacterium and Stenotrophomonas were highly enriched in association with C. cinerea. Developing and producing these new easy-to-use tools to investigate how bacteria overcome dispersal limitations in cooperation with fungi is important to unravel the mechanisms by which BFIs affect processes at an ecosystem scale in soils and other unsaturated environments.Entities:
Keywords: zzm321990 Coprinopsiszzm321990 ; additive printing; bacteria–fungi interactions; horse dung; soil
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2021 PMID: 33440006 PMCID: PMC7878174 DOI: 10.1093/femsec/fiab003
Source DB: PubMed Journal: FEMS Microbiol Ecol ISSN: 0168-6496 Impact factor: 4.194
Figure 2.Validation of the ability of bacteria to colonize the mycelial network of the fungus C. cinerea. Dispersal of fluorescently labeled Cupriavidus oxalaticus (Co), Cupriavidus necator (Cn) and Pseudomonas putida (Pp) was tested in two-compartment Petri dishes with malt agar (MA) and carboxymethyl cellulose (CMC) (fungal growth), and R2A (bacterial growth) media or by co-inoculation in CMC. (A) Schematic representation of the experimental design in which the fungus and bacteria were inoculated in physically separated compartments. To test bacterial dispersal, agar pieces containing the bacterial inoculum were physically separated by cutting out agar slices forming a gap that must be connected by fungal hyphae. Macroscopic images demonstrating the colonization by C. cinerea grown on MA (B) or CMC (C) of the R2A media without bacteria. (D) Control with bacteria only grown on R2A. Macroscopic images demonstrating the colonization by C. cinerea grown on MA (E) or CMC (F) of R2A media pre-inoculated with bacteria. Bacterial dispersal was visually assessed by stereoscopic observations (right-hand panels). The colocalization of the fluorescence with the hyphae (bright field) indicates the colonization of the fungal mycelial network by the fluorescently labeled bacteria. The pictures correspond to close-up images taken from the R2A medium. The scale bar in the close-up images (in white) corresponds to 50 µm. (G) Schematic representation of the experimental design in which the fungus and bacterium were co-inoculated directly in the same medium. (H and I) Images showing the colonization of the fungal mycelium when C. cinerea was co-inoculated in CMC together with C. oxalaticus. The white spot observed in the bright-field image corresponds to a fungal primordium, which was not colonized by the bacteria as seen in the fluorescent image.
Figure 1.Design and use of the 3D printed columns. (A) Schematic representation of the design for additive printing including the dimensions of the different components. In the 3D model, the internal regular lattice structure consists of a 2 mm unit cell and 0.5 mm strut diameter replacing the glass beads from the previous design (Simon et al. 2015). The structure of the lattice can be appreciated in the video included in the Supporting Information. (B) Once printed, the columns can be autoclaved and any kind of agar-based medium (pieces usually cut from a Petri dish; step 1) can be placed on the top (2) and on the bottom of the lattice (3) as target and attracting media, respectively. Once completed with a filtering mesh in direct contact with the attracting medium, the columns can be placed on the environmental sample (4). After incubation, the target medium (5) can be collected from the columns and used to isolate bacteria and fungi by reculturing [in this case carboxymethyl cellulose (CMC) medium as indicated in the text; step 6] or for direct DNA extraction (7).
Figure 3.Schematic representation of the experimental design and macroscopic images illustrating the results after reculturing of the target medium and dung samples. (A) In the experimental design, the target medium consisted of either CMC medium pre-colonized by C. cinerea or CMC medium only. The attracting medium was always CMC. The columns were placed on horse dung or on horse dung pre-inoculated with C. cinerea. The combinations of these resulted in three treatments in which the expected direction of dispersal from C. cinerea, other fungi and bacteria dispersing using fungal highways is expected to vary. (B) Examples of stereoscopy images of CMC medium inoculated with samples from the target medium (top) or horse dung (bottom), for the respective treatments.
Colonization and recovery of fungi and bacteria in the 3D columns. The colonization and recovery were assessed by reculturing (growth) or by DNA extraction based on the cultures (culture) or agar/dung samples (direct). The success in the amplification and sequencing of ITS (fungi) and 16S rRNA (bacteria) genes is also indicated for DNA extracts obtained from the cultures or agar/dung samples.R = replicate number; w = weak growth; + = positive; − = negative; a = actinobacterial-like bacterial colonies.
| Growth | DNA extraction (ng/µL) | ITS | 16S rDNA | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Treatment | Sample | | Fungi | Bacteria | Culture | Direct | Culture | Direct | Culture | Direct |
| TM agar | Horse dung | 1 | + | + | 2.11 | 44.2 | + | + | + | + |
| 2 | + | + | 32.2 | 76.1 | + | + | + | + | ||
| 3 | + | + | 5.14 | 74.1 | + | + | + | + | ||
| Target agar | 1 | w | + | 0.167 | <0.5 ng/mL | − | + | + | + | |
| 2 | w | + | 0.374 | <0.5 ng/mL | − | + | + | + | ||
| 3 | + | w | 1.94 | 1.35 | + | + | + | − | ||
| HD | Horse dung | 1 | + | + | 29.8 | 110 | + | + | + | + |
| 2 | + | + | 14.3 | 188 | + | + | + | + | ||
| 3 | + | + | 37.8 | 84.7 | + | + | + | + | ||
| Target agar | 1 | − | a | 9.43 | 3.18 | − | - | + | − | |
| 2 | + | a | 11.8 | 0.294 | + | − | + | − | ||
| 3 | + | + | 2.74 | 0.1 | + | + | + | + | ||
| Uninoculated | Horse dung | 1 | + | + | 15.8 | 40.2 | + | + | + | + |
| 2 | + | + | 9.07 | 44.6 | + | + | + | + | ||
| 3 | + | + | 23.5 | 40.4 | + | + | + | + | ||
| Target agar | 1 | − | a | 0.264 | <0.5 ng/mL | − | − | + | − | |
| 2 | + | + | 17.4 | 2.74 | + | + | + | + | ||
| 3 | − | a | 0.383 | <0.5 ng/mL | − | − | + | − | ||
Relative abundance of ITS OTUs classified as Coprinopsis spp. The relative abundance was estimated based on sequencing results from DNA from the culturable fraction of the community (culture) or agar/dung samples (direct). NA = not applicable (no sequence data available).
| Relative abundance | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Treatment | Sample | R | Culture | Direct |
| TM agar | Horse dung | 1 | 0 | 0 |
| 2 | 0 | 0.08 | ||
| 3 | 0 | 2.92 | ||
| Target agar | 1 | NA | 43.97 | |
| 2 | NA | 35.48 | ||
| 3 | 44.46 | 39.57 | ||
| HD | Horse dung | 1 | 0.03 | 0.09 |
| 2 | 0 | 0.47 | ||
| 3 | 0 | 2.3 | ||
| Target agar | 1 | NA | NA | |
| 2 | 0.03 | NA | ||
| 3 | 0 | 0 | ||
| Uninoculated | Horse dung | 1 | 0 | 0.31 |
| 2 | 0 | 0.1 | ||
| 3 | 0 | 0 | ||
| Target agar | 1 | NA | NA | |
| 2 | 0 | 0 | ||
| 3 | NA | NA | ||
Figure 4.Fungal community analysis based on the sequencing of ITS comparing the communities in horse dung and the target medium. The treatment corresponds to columns in which C. cinerea was pre-inoculated in the target medium. Each plot represents the comparison in the relative abundance of the most dominant fungal genera in horse dung (bottom) and target medium (up) per column replicate. The analysis corresponded to DNA extractions of the total community (A; three replicates) or of the culturable community (B; one replicate). To increase readability, the relative abundance of the eight most abundant genera is shown, and other genera were grouped in a ‘Minor genera’ category. A complete representation of the community composition is shown in Fig. S2 (Supporting Information).
Figure 5.Bacterial community analysis based on the sequencing of 16S rDNA comparing the communities in horse dung and the target medium. The treatment corresponds to columns in which C. cinerea was pre-inoculated in the target medium. Each plot represents the comparison in the relative abundance of the most dominant bacterial genera in horse dung (bottom) and target medium (up) per column replicate. The analysis corresponded to DNA extractions of the total community (A) or of the culturable community (B), represented each by one replicate. To increase readability, the relative abundance of the eight most abundant genera is shown, and other genera were grouped in a ‘Minor genera’ category. A complete representation of the community composition is shown in Fig. S5 (Supporting Information).
Figure 6.Bacterial and fungal community analysis based on the sequencing of the 16S rDNA and ITS genes comparing the communities in horse dung and the target medium in the uninoculated treatment. Each plot represents the comparison in the relative abundance of the most dominant genera of bacteria (upper top-half of the figure) and fungi (bottom half of the figure) in horse dung (lower panel) and target medium (upper panel). The analysis corresponded to DNA extractions of the total community (A) or of the culturable community (B). To increase readability, the relative abundance of the eight most abundant genera is shown, and other genera were grouped in a ‘Minor genera’ category. A complete representation of the community composition is shown in Fig. S6 (Supporting Information).