Literature DB >> 33439426

Gender differences in the adverse events associated with cardiovascular drugs in a spontaneous reporting system in South Korea.

Han-Heui Park1, Ju Hwan Kim1, Dongwon Yoon1, Hyesung Lee1, Ju-Young Shin2,3.   

Abstract

Background Studies on disease-related gender differences in pharmacodynamics and pharmacokinetics are prevalent; however, gender differences in the drug-related adverse events have not been systemically described. Objective To explore gender differences in the adverse events associated with cardiovascular drugs using a spontaneous reporting system. Setting This study was conducted using the Korea adverse event reporting system and national health insurance databases. Methods The number of reported adverse events was divided by the number of patients diagnosed with cardiovascular diseases (Korean Standard Classification of Disease, 7th Revision, I05-I70) and prescribed cardiovascular drugs. We calculated adverse event reporting rates per 100,000 persons and the reporting ratio for women, compared with men. Main outcome measures Reporting ratios across the groups of adverse events and cardiovascular drugs. Results We identified 27,533 adverse events associated with cardiovascular drugs and 9,413,666 patients with cardiovascular disease. Compared with men, reporting ratios of women were higher in the following categories: Overall (1.09, 95% CI, 1.06-1.11), beta blockers (1.20, 95% CI, 1.05-1.39), and calcium channel blockers (1.14, 95% CI, 1.03-1.27). For the adverse events, the reporting ratio was 1.34 (95% CI, 1.14-1.58) for musculoskeletal disorders and 2.54 (95% CI, 2.10-3.07) for oedema in women. Conclusion Our findings on differential adverse events reporting rates associated with the cardiovascular drugs between women and men provide an evidence on possible gender differences in wide range of pharmacotherapy. A clear understanding of the relationship between drug-induced adverse events and gender will aid in the development of therapeutic interventions being tailored to the individual patients.
© 2021. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Nature Switzerland AG part of Springer Nature.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Adverse events; Cardiovascular drugs; Gender; Population study; Safety

Year:  2021        PMID: 33439426     DOI: 10.1007/s11096-020-01212-z

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Clin Pharm


  37 in total

1.  Does the hormonal situation modify lipid effects by lifestyle factors in middle-aged women? Results from a population-based study of Swedish women: the women's health in the Lund area study.

Authors:  Yasameen A Shakir; Göran Samsioe; Per Nyberg; Jonas Lidfeldt; Christina Nerbrand
Journal:  Metabolism       Date:  2006-08       Impact factor: 8.694

Review 2.  Gender differences in the effects of cardiovascular drugs.

Authors:  J Tamargo; G Rosano; T Walther; J Duarte; A Niessner; J C Kaski; C Ceconi; H Drexel; K Kjeldsen; G Savarese; C Torp-Pedersen; D Atar; B S Lewis; S Agewall
Journal:  Eur Heart J Cardiovasc Pharmacother       Date:  2017-07-01

3.  Age and sex distribution of suspected adverse drug reactions to newly marketed drugs in general practice in England: analysis of 48 cohort studies.

Authors:  R M Martin; P N Biswas; S N Freemantle; G L Pearce; R D Mann
Journal:  Br J Clin Pharmacol       Date:  1998-11       Impact factor: 4.335

Review 4.  Menopause, the metabolic syndrome, and mind-body therapies.

Authors:  Kim E Innes; Terry Kit Selfe; Ann Gill Taylor
Journal:  Menopause       Date:  2008 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 2.953

5.  Cardiovascular diseases in women: a statement from the policy conference of the European Society of Cardiology.

Authors:  Marco Stramba-Badiale; Kim M Fox; Silvia G Priori; Peter Collins; Caroline Daly; Ian Graham; Benct Jonsson; Karin Schenck-Gustafsson; Michal Tendera
Journal:  Eur Heart J       Date:  2006-03-07       Impact factor: 29.983

6.  Systematic Analysis of Adverse Event Reports for Sex Differences in Adverse Drug Events.

Authors:  Yue Yu; Jun Chen; Dingcheng Li; Liwei Wang; Wei Wang; Hongfang Liu
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2016-04-22       Impact factor: 4.379

7.  Sex differences in pharmacokinetics predict adverse drug reactions in women.

Authors:  Irving Zucker; Brian J Prendergast
Journal:  Biol Sex Differ       Date:  2020-06-05       Impact factor: 5.027

8.  Quantifying Sex Bias in Clinical Studies at Scale With Automated Data Extraction.

Authors:  Sergey Feldman; Waleed Ammar; Kyle Lo; Elly Trepman; Madeleine van Zuylen; Oren Etzioni
Journal:  JAMA Netw Open       Date:  2019-07-03

Review 9.  Sex differences in pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics.

Authors:  Offie P Soldin; Donald R Mattison
Journal:  Clin Pharmacokinet       Date:  2009       Impact factor: 6.447

10.  Sex differences in age-related cardiovascular mortality.

Authors:  Tomi S Mikkola; Mika Gissler; Marko Merikukka; Pauliina Tuomikoski; Olavi Ylikorkala
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-05-20       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.