Ke Wang1, Dylan Zelko, Maggie Delano. 1. Department of Biomedical Engineering Duke University Durham, NC 27708, United States of America.
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the performance of five different types of textiles as band electrodes for calf bioimpedance measurements in comparison with conventional spot Ag/AgCl electrodes. APPROACH: Calf bioimpedance measurements were performed in 10 healthy volunteers with five different textile materials cut into bands and Ag/AgCl spot electrodes as a baseline. Collected bioimpedance data were analyzed in terms of precision, fit error and presence of measurement artifacts. Each textile material was also evaluated for participant comfort. MAIN RESULTS: Bioimpedance values for spot electrodes were higher at low frequencies as compared with band electrodes but not at high frequencies. This suggests that spot electrodes have frequency dependent current distributions that adversely impact their use for volume measurements and band electrodes are preferable. The SMP130T-B fabric had the highest precision and the lowest best fit error to the Cole model of the tested textile materials. However, it was the least comfortable textile and most expensive. The Stretch material performed slightly worse than the SMP130T-B fabric, but was half the cost and the most comfortable. SIGNIFICANCE: These results suggest that there are suitable textile materials for use as dry, band electrodes for calf bioimpedance measurements and that these band electrodes enable greater current uniformity. These textiles could be integrated into a compression sock for remote monitoring of diseases such as Congestive Heart Failure.
OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the performance of five different types of textiles as band electrodes for calf bioimpedance measurements in comparison with conventional spot Ag/AgCl electrodes. APPROACH: Calf bioimpedance measurements were performed in 10 healthy volunteers with five different textile materials cut into bands and Ag/AgCl spot electrodes as a baseline. Collected bioimpedance data were analyzed in terms of precision, fit error and presence of measurement artifacts. Each textile material was also evaluated for participant comfort. MAIN RESULTS: Bioimpedance values for spot electrodes were higher at low frequencies as compared with band electrodes but not at high frequencies. This suggests that spot electrodes have frequency dependent current distributions that adversely impact their use for volume measurements and band electrodes are preferable. The SMP130T-B fabric had the highest precision and the lowest best fit error to the Cole model of the tested textile materials. However, it was the least comfortable textile and most expensive. The Stretch material performed slightly worse than the SMP130T-B fabric, but was half the cost and the most comfortable. SIGNIFICANCE: These results suggest that there are suitable textile materials for use as dry, band electrodes for calf bioimpedance measurements and that these band electrodes enable greater current uniformity. These textiles could be integrated into a compression sock for remote monitoring of diseases such as Congestive Heart Failure.