Literature DB >> 33437987

Using machine learning to identify local cellular properties that support re-entrant activation in patient-specific models of atrial fibrillation.

Cesare Corrado1, Steven Williams1, Caroline Roney1, Gernot Plank2, Mark O'Neill1, Steven Niederer1.   

Abstract

AIMS: Atrial fibrillation (AF) is sustained by re-entrant activation patterns. Ablation strategies have been proposed that target regions of tissue that may support re-entrant activation patterns. We aimed to characterize the tissue properties associated with regions that tether re-entrant activation patterns in a validated virtual patient cohort. METHODS AND
RESULTS: Atrial fibrillation patient-specific models (seven paroxysmal and three persistent) were generated and validated against local activation time (LAT) measurements during an S1-S2 pacing protocol from the coronary sinus and high right atrium, respectively. Atrial models were stimulated with burst pacing from three locations in the proximity of each pulmonary vein to initiate re-entrant activation patterns. Five atria exhibited sustained activation patterns for at least 80 s. Models with short maximum action potential durations (APDs) were associated with sustained activation. Phase singularities were mapped across the atria sustained activation patterns. Regions with a low maximum conduction velocity (CV) were associated with tethering of phase singularities. A support vector machine (SVM) was trained on maximum local conduction velocity and action potential duration to identify regions that tether phase singularities. The SVM identified regions of tissue that could support tethering with 91% accuracy. This accuracy increased to 95% when the SVM was also trained on surface area.
CONCLUSION: In a virtual patient cohort, local tissue properties, that can be measured (CV) or estimated (APD; using effective refractory period as a surrogate) clinically, identified regions of tissue that tether phase singularities. Combing CV and APD with atrial surface area further improved the accuracy in identifying regions that tether phase singularities.
© The Author(s) 2021. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the European Society of Cardiology.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Atrial fibrillation; Patient-specific model; Phase singularity map; Support vector machine

Year:  2021        PMID: 33437987      PMCID: PMC7943361          DOI: 10.1093/europace/euaa386

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Europace        ISSN: 1099-5129            Impact factor:   5.214


  4 in total

1.  Determining anatomical and electrophysiological detail requirements for computational ventricular models of porcine myocardial infarction.

Authors:  Caroline Mendonca Costa; Philip Gemmell; Mark K Elliott; John Whitaker; Fernando O Campos; Marina Strocchi; Aurel Neic; Karli Gillette; Edward Vigmond; Gernot Plank; Reza Razavi; Mark O'Neill; Christopher A Rinaldi; Martin J Bishop
Journal:  Comput Biol Med       Date:  2021-11-26       Impact factor: 4.589

2.  Detection of focal source and arrhythmogenic substrate from body surface potentials to guide atrial fibrillation ablation.

Authors:  Yingjing Feng; Caroline H Roney; Jason D Bayer; Steven A Niederer; Mélèze Hocini; Edward J Vigmond
Journal:  PLoS Comput Biol       Date:  2022-03-21       Impact factor: 4.475

Review 3.  How synergy between mechanistic and statistical models is impacting research in atrial fibrillation.

Authors:  Jieyun Bai; Yaosheng Lu; Huijin Wang; Jichao Zhao
Journal:  Front Physiol       Date:  2022-08-30       Impact factor: 4.755

4.  Credibility assessment of patient-specific computational modeling using patient-specific cardiac modeling as an exemplar.

Authors:  Suran Galappaththige; Richard A Gray; Caroline Mendonca Costa; Steven Niederer; Pras Pathmanathan
Journal:  PLoS Comput Biol       Date:  2022-10-10       Impact factor: 4.779

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.