Andy South1, Ahmadou Dicko2, Mark Herringer3, Peter M Macharia4, Joseph Maina5, Emelda A Okiro4,6, Robert W Snow4,6, Anelda van der Walt7. 1. Department of Vector Biology, Liverpool School of Tropical Medicine, Liverpool, UK. 2. STATS4D, Dakar, Senegal. 3. The Global Healthsites Mapping Project, Amsterdam, The Netherlands. 4. Population Health Unit, Kenya Medical Research Institute - Wellcome Trust Research Programme, Nairobi, Kenya. 5. International Organization for Migration, Nairobi, Kenya. 6. Centre for Tropical Medicine and Global Health, Nuffield Department of Clinical Medicine, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK. 7. Talarify, Kleinmond, South Africa.
Abstract
Background: Open data on the locations and services provided by health facilities have, in some countries, allowed the development of software tools contributing to COVID-19 response. The UN and WHO encourage countries to make health facility location data open, to encourage use and improvement. We provide a summary of open access health facility location data in Africa using re-useable R code. We aim to support data analysts developing software tools to address COVID-19 response in individual countries. In Africa there are currently three main sources of such open data; 1) direct from national ministries of health, 2) a database for sub-Saharan Africa collated and published by a team from KEMRI-Wellcome Trust Research Programme and now hosted by WHO, and 3) The Global Healthsites Mapping Project in collaboration with OpenStreetMap. Methods: We searched for and documented official national facility location data that were openly available. We developed re-useable open-source R code to summarise and visualise facility location data by country from the three sources. This re-useable code is used to provide a web user interface allowing data exploration through maps and plots of facility type. Results: Out of 52 African countries, seven currently provide an official open facility list that can be downloaded and analysed reproducibly. Considering all three sources, there are over 185,000 health facility locations available for Africa. However, there are differences and overlaps between sources and a lack of data on capacities and service provision. Conclusions: These summaries and software tools can be used to encourage greater use of existing health facility location data, incentivise further improvements in the provision of those data by national suppliers, and encourage collaboration within wider data communities. The tools are a part of the afrimapr project, actively developing R building blocks to facilitate the use of health data in Africa. Copyright:
Background: Open data on the locations and services provided by health facilities have, in some countries, allowed the development of software tools contributing to COVID-19 response. The UN and WHO encourage countries to make health facility location data open, to encourage use and improvement. We provide a summary of open access health facility location data in Africa using re-useable R code. We aim to support data analysts developing software tools to address COVID-19 response in individual countries. In Africa there are currently three main sources of such open data; 1) direct from national ministries of health, 2) a database for sub-Saharan Africa collated and published by a team from KEMRI-Wellcome Trust Research Programme and now hosted by WHO, and 3) The Global Healthsites Mapping Project in collaboration with OpenStreetMap. Methods: We searched for and documented official national facility location data that were openly available. We developed re-useable open-source R code to summarise and visualise facility location data by country from the three sources. This re-useable code is used to provide a web user interface allowing data exploration through maps and plots of facility type. Results: Out of 52 African countries, seven currently provide an official open facility list that can be downloaded and analysed reproducibly. Considering all three sources, there are over 185,000 health facility locations available for Africa. However, there are differences and overlaps between sources and a lack of data on capacities and service provision. Conclusions: These summaries and software tools can be used to encourage greater use of existing health facility location data, incentivise further improvements in the provision of those data by national suppliers, and encourage collaboration within wider data communities. The tools are a part of the afrimapr project, actively developing R building blocks to facilitate the use of health data in Africa. Copyright:
Authors: Benjamin Rader; Christina M Astley; Karla Therese L Sy; Kara Sewalk; Yulin Hswen; John S Brownstein; Moritz U G Kraemer Journal: J Travel Med Date: 2020-11-09 Impact factor: 8.490
Authors: Joseph Maina; Paul O Ouma; Peter M Macharia; Victor A Alegana; Benard Mitto; Ibrahima Socé Fall; Abdisalan M Noor; Robert W Snow; Emelda A Okiro Journal: Sci Data Date: 2019-07-25 Impact factor: 6.444
Authors: Paul O Ouma; Joseph Maina; Pamela N Thuranira; Peter M Macharia; Victor A Alegana; Mike English; Emelda A Okiro; Robert W Snow Journal: Lancet Glob Health Date: 2018-01-26 Impact factor: 38.927
Authors: E N Hulland; K E Wiens; S Shirude; J D Morgan; A Bertozzi-Villa; T H Farag; N Fullman; M U G Kraemer; M K Miller-Petrie; V Gupta; R C Reiner; P Rabinowitz; J N Wasserheit; B P Bell; S I Hay; D J Weiss; D M Pigott Journal: BMC Med Date: 2019-12-30 Impact factor: 8.775
Authors: Sami Petricola; Marcel Reinmuth; Sven Lautenbach; Charles Hatfield; Alexander Zipf Journal: Int J Health Geogr Date: 2022-10-12 Impact factor: 5.310