Literature DB >> 33437874

Hospital performance and payment: impact of integrating pay-for-performance on healthcare effectiveness in Lebanon.

Jade Khalife1,2, Walid Ammar2,3, Maria Emmelin1, Fadi El-Jardali3, Bjorn Ekman1.   

Abstract

Background: In 2014 the Lebanese Ministry of Public Health integrated pay-for-performance into setting hospital reimbursement tiers, to provide hospitalization service coverage for the majority of the Lebanese population. This policy was intended to improve effectiveness by decreasing unnecessary hospitalizations, and improve fairness by including risk-adjustment in setting hospital performance scores.
Methods: We applied a systematic approach to assess the impact of the new policy on hospital performance. The main impact measure was a national casemix index, calculated across 2011-2016 using medical discharge and surgical procedure codes. A single-group interrupted time series analysis model with Newey ordinary least squares regression was estimated, including adjustment for seasonality, and stratified by case type. Code-level analysis was used to attribute and explain changes in casemix index due to specific diagnoses and procedures.
Results: Our final model included 1,353,025 cases across 146 hospitals with a post-intervention lag-time of two months and seasonality adjustment. Among medical cases the intervention resulted in a positive casemix index trend of 0.11% per month (coefficient 0.002, CI 0.001-0.003), and a level increase of 2.25% (coefficient 0.022, CI 0.005-0.039). Trend changes were attributed to decreased cases of diarrhea and gastroenteritis, abdominal and pelvic pain, essential hypertension and fever of unknown origin. A shift from medium to short-stay cases for specific diagnoses was also detected. Level changes were attributed to improved coding practices, particularly for breast cancer, leukemia and chemotherapy. No impact on surgical casemix index was found. Conclusions: The 2014 policy resulted in increased healthcare effectiveness, by increasing the casemix index of hospitals contracted by the Ministry. This increase was mainly attributed to decreased unnecessary hospitalizations and was accompanied by improved medical discharge coding practices. Integration of pay-for-performance within a healthcare system may contribute to improving effectiveness. Effective hospital regulation can be achieved through systematic collection and analysis of routine data. Copyright:
© 2020 Khalife J et al.

Entities:  

Keywords:  casemix index; coding; health systems; interrupted time series analysis; low and middle income countries; performance; reform; unnecessary hospitalization

Year:  2020        PMID: 33437874      PMCID: PMC7780336          DOI: 10.12688/wellcomeopenres.15810.2

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Wellcome Open Res        ISSN: 2398-502X


  49 in total

Review 1.  Evaluation designs for adequacy, plausibility and probability of public health programme performance and impact.

Authors:  J P Habicht; C G Victora; J P Vaughan
Journal:  Int J Epidemiol       Date:  1999-02       Impact factor: 7.196

2.  Public reporting and pay for performance in hospital quality improvement.

Authors:  Peter K Lindenauer; Denise Remus; Sheila Roman; Michael B Rothberg; Evan M Benjamin; Allen Ma; Dale W Bratzler
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2007-01-26       Impact factor: 91.245

Review 3.  The Hospital Readmissions Reduction Program-learning from failure of a healthcare policy.

Authors:  Ankur Gupta; Gregg C Fonarow
Journal:  Eur J Heart Fail       Date:  2018-05-23       Impact factor: 15.534

4.  The effect of pay-for-performance in hospitals: lessons for quality improvement.

Authors:  Rachel M Werner; Jonathan T Kolstad; Elizabeth A Stuart; Daniel Polsky
Journal:  Health Aff (Millwood)       Date:  2011-04       Impact factor: 6.301

Review 5.  Effectiveness of UK provider financial incentives on quality of care: a systematic review.

Authors:  Rishi Mandavia; Nishchay Mehta; Anne Schilder; Elias Mossialos
Journal:  Br J Gen Pract       Date:  2017-10-09       Impact factor: 5.386

6.  Adopting Nutrition Care Process Terminology at the National Level: The Norwegian Experience in Evaluating Compatibility with International Statistical Classification of Diseases and Related Health Problems, 10th Revision, and the Existing Norwegian Coding System.

Authors:  Sissi Stove Lorentzen; Constantina Papoutsakis; Esther F Myers; Lene Thoresen
Journal:  J Acad Nutr Diet       Date:  2018-04-22       Impact factor: 4.910

7.  Hospital Contracting Reforms: The Lebanese Ministry of Public Health Experience.

Authors:  Jade Khalife; Nadwa Rafeh; Jihad Makouk; Fadi El-Jardali; Bjorn Ekman; Nabil Kronfol; Ghassan Hamadeh; Walid Ammar
Journal:  Health Syst Reform       Date:  2017-01-02

Review 8.  Pay-for-performance in the United Kingdom: impact of the quality and outcomes framework: a systematic review.

Authors:  Stephen J Gillam; A Niroshan Siriwardena; Nicholas Steel
Journal:  Ann Fam Med       Date:  2012 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 5.166

9.  Readmission Rates After Passage of the Hospital Readmissions Reduction Program: A Pre-Post Analysis.

Authors:  Jason H Wasfy; Corwin Matthew Zigler; Christine Choirat; Yun Wang; Francesca Dominici; Robert W Yeh
Journal:  Ann Intern Med       Date:  2016-12-27       Impact factor: 25.391

10.  Interrupted time series regression for the evaluation of public health interventions: a tutorial.

Authors:  James Lopez Bernal; Steven Cummins; Antonio Gasparrini
Journal:  Int J Epidemiol       Date:  2017-02-01       Impact factor: 7.196

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.